Barrett Emily S, Horton Daniel B, Roy Jason, Xia Weiyi, Greenberg Patricia, Andrews Tracy, Gennaro Maria Laura, Parmar Veenat, Russell William D, Reilly Nancy, Uprety Priyanka, Gantner John J, Stockman Lydia, Trooskin Stanley Z, Blaser Martin J, Carson Jeffrey L, Panettieri Reynold A
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health; Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School; Rutgers Center for Pharmacoepidemiology and Treatment Science, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy and Aging Research; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 31;7(12):ofaa534. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa534. eCollection 2020 Dec.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is a critical concern among healthcare workers (HCWs). Other studies have assessed SARS-CoV-2 virus and antibodies in HCWs, with disparate findings regarding risk based on role and demographics.
We screened 3904 employees and clinicians for SARS-CoV-2 virus positivity and serum immunoglobulin (Ig)G at a major New Jersey hospital from April 28 to June 30, 2020. We assessed positive tests in relation to demographic and occupational characteristics and prior coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms using multivariable logistic regression models.
Thirteen participants (0.3%) tested positive for virus and 374 (9.6%) tested positive for IgG (total positive: 381 [9.8%]). Compared with participants with no patient care duties, the odds of positive testing (virus or antibodies) were higher for those with direct patient contact: below-median patient contact, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.71 and 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18-2.48; above-median patient contact, aOR = 1.98 and 95% CI = 1.35-2.91. The proportion of participants testing positive was highest for phlebotomists (23.9%), maintenance/housekeeping (17.3%), dining/food services (16.9%), and interpersonal/support roles (13.7%) despite lower levels of direct patient care duties. Positivity rates were lower among doctors (7.2%) and nurses (9.1%), roles with fewer underrepresented minorities. After adjusting for job role and patient care responsibilities and other factors, Black and Latinx workers had 2-fold increased odds of a positive test compared with white workers. Loss of smell, taste, and fever were associated with positive testing.
The HCW categories at highest risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection include support staff and underrepresented minorities with and without patient care responsibilities. Future work is needed to examine potential sources of community and nosocomial exposure among these understudied HCWs.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染是医护人员(HCW)极为关注的问题。其他研究评估了医护人员中的SARS-CoV-2病毒和抗体,基于角色和人口统计学特征得出的风险结果各异。
2020年4月28日至6月30日,我们在新泽西州一家大型医院对3904名员工和临床医生进行了SARS-CoV-2病毒阳性检测及血清免疫球蛋白(Ig)G检测。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估了与人口统计学和职业特征以及既往2019冠状病毒病症状相关的阳性检测结果。
13名参与者(0.3%)病毒检测呈阳性,374名(9.6%)IgG检测呈阳性(总阳性率:381名[9.8%])。与无患者护理职责的参与者相比,直接接触患者的人员检测呈阳性(病毒或抗体)的几率更高:患者接触量低于中位数者,调整后的优势比(aOR)=1.71,95%置信区间[CI]=1.18 - 2.48;患者接触量高于中位数者,aOR = 1.98,95% CI = 1.35 - 2.91。尽管直接患者护理职责水平较低,但采血技师(23.9%)、维护/保洁人员(17.3%)、餐饮/食品服务人员(16.9%)以及人际/支持岗位人员(13.7%)检测呈阳性的比例最高。医生(7.2%)和护士(9.1%)的阳性率较低,这两个岗位中少数族裔代表性不足的情况较少。在对工作角色、患者护理职责及其他因素进行调整后,黑人和拉丁裔员工检测呈阳性的几率比白人员工高出两倍。嗅觉丧失、味觉丧失和发热与检测呈阳性相关。
SARS-CoV-2感染风险最高的医护人员类别包括有和没有患者护理职责的辅助人员以及少数族裔代表性不足的人员。未来需要开展工作,以研究这些研究较少的医护人员在社区和医院感染的潜在来源。