• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位差异与胃癌及单一 SES 变量预测风险的研究

Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Mar;53(1):170-178. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z
PMID:33404986
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8257773/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). This study seeks to examine education, income, and occupation variables separately to identify the single variable that can be best used to assess SES risk for GC.

METHODS

Data from a case-control survey study were used. Logistic regression models were created for education, income, and occupation adjusted for age, sex, and race. Models were compared using AIC, c-statistics, and pseudo-R square to determine the model that had the highest risk predictive ability.

RESULTS

GC cases had lower education levels and more commonly held jobs in unskilled labor. Annual household income was lower in cases compared to controls. Age, gender, race, education, and occupation were associated with increased risk of GC. The education model adjusted for age, gender, and race found < high school (HS) education to have an OR of 3.18 (95% CI 1.09-9.25) for GC compared to > HS education. The occupation model demonstrated that employment in unskilled labor had OR of 4.32 (95% CI 1.05-17.76) for GC compared to professional occupation. Model fit was best for the education model (AIC: 113.583, lower AIC is better) compared to income (117.562) or occupation (117.032). Education contributed the most to model variability (% delta pseudo-R square (4.7%)) compared to occupation (4.0%) or income (3.8%).

CONCLUSION

Education level was the single most reliable measure of GC risk among 3 SES variables and can be employed as an ideal single indicator of SES-related GC risk when multiple SES factors cannot be obtained.

摘要

简介

社会经济地位(SES)是胃癌(GC)的已知危险因素。本研究旨在分别检查教育、收入和职业变量,以确定可用于评估 GC 的 SES 风险的最佳单一变量。

方法

使用病例对照调查研究的数据。为调整年龄、性别和种族后,为教育、收入和职业创建了逻辑回归模型。使用 AIC、C 统计量和伪 R 平方来比较模型,以确定具有最高风险预测能力的模型。

结果

GC 病例的受教育程度较低,从事非熟练劳动力的工作更为常见。与对照组相比,病例的家庭年收入较低。年龄、性别、种族、教育和职业与 GC 风险增加相关。调整年龄、性别和种族的教育模型发现,与高中学历(HS)相比,未完成 HS 教育的 OR 为 3.18(95%CI 1.09-9.25)。职业模型表明,与专业职业相比,从事非熟练劳动的就业 OR 为 4.32(95%CI 1.05-17.76)。与收入(117.562)或职业(117.032)相比,教育模型的拟合度最佳(AIC:113.583,AIC 越低越好)。与职业(4.0%)或收入(3.8%)相比,教育对模型变异性的贡献最大(%Delta 伪 R 平方(4.7%))。

结论

在 3 个 SES 变量中,教育水平是 GC 风险的唯一最可靠指标,当无法获得多个 SES 因素时,可以将其用作 SES 相关 GC 风险的理想单一指标。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.社会经济地位差异与胃癌及单一 SES 变量预测风险的研究
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Mar;53(1):170-178. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
2
The association of personal and neighborhood socioeconomic indicators with subclinical cardiovascular disease in an elderly cohort. The cardiovascular health study.老年队列中个人及邻里社会经济指标与亚临床心血管疾病的关联。心血管健康研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(10):2139-47. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.017.
3
Associations between socioeconomic status markers and depressive symptoms by race and gender: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).种族和性别视角下社会经济地位指标与抑郁症状的相关性:来自动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)的结果。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;28(8):535-542.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 22.
4
Socioeconomic status and psychological stress: Examining intersection with race, sex and US geographic region in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke study.社会经济地位与心理压力:在美国地理区域差异和中风研究中,考察种族、性别与两者的交叉关系。
Stress Health. 2022 Apr;38(2):340-349. doi: 10.1002/smi.3095. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
5
Socioeconomic status and health: how education, income, and occupation contribute to risk factors for cardiovascular disease.社会经济地位与健康:教育、收入和职业如何影响心血管疾病的风险因素。
Am J Public Health. 1992 Jun;82(6):816-20. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.6.816.
6
Independent and combined influence of homeownership, occupation, education, income, and community poverty on physical health in persons with arthritis.拥有住房、职业、教育、收入以及社区贫困对关节炎患者身体健康的独立和综合影响。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 May;63(5):643-53. doi: 10.1002/acr.20428.
7
Association of Race and Family Socioeconomic Status With Pediatric Postoperative Mortality.种族和家庭社会经济地位与儿科术后死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222989. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2989.
8
Association of socioeconomic status and exercise capacity in adults with coronary heart disease (from the Heart and Soul Study).冠心病成年人社会经济地位与运动能力的关联(源自心灵研究)
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 15;101(4):462-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.093. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
9
Choice of measure matters: A study of the relationship between socioeconomic status and psychosocial resources in a middle-aged normal population.测量方式的选择很重要:一项关于中年正常人群社会经济地位与心理社会资源之间关系的研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 23;12(8):e0178929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178929. eCollection 2017.
10
Associations between measures of socio-economic status, beliefs about back pain, and exposure to a mass media campaign to improve back beliefs.社会经济地位衡量指标、对背痛的认知与参与旨在改善背部相关认知的大众媒体宣传活动之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 25;17(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4387-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Related Differences in Gastric Adenocarcinoma from 2000-2020: A SEER Database Analysis.2000 - 2020年胃腺癌的年龄相关差异:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Mar 13;56(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01168-1.
2
Incidence of Stomach, Liver, and Colorectal Cancers by Geography and Social Vulnerability Among American Indian and Alaska Native Populations, 2010-2019.2010-2019 年美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民人群按地理位置和社会脆弱性划分的胃癌、肝癌和结直肠癌发病率。
Am J Epidemiol. 2024 Jan 8;193(1):58-74. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwad194.
3
Global and regional quality of care index (QCI) by gender and age in oesophageal cancer: A systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990-2019.全球和地区食管癌按性别和年龄划分的护理质量指数(QCI):1990-2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 3;18(10):e0292348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292348. eCollection 2023.
4
Chronic Periodontitis and the Potential Likelihood of Gastric Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study in the Korean Population Utilizing a National Health Sample Cohort.慢性牙周炎与胃癌的潜在关联:一项利用韩国全国健康样本队列进行的巢式病例对照研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Aug 4;15(15):3974. doi: 10.3390/cancers15153974.
5
Intersections between innate immune response and gastric cancer development.先天免疫反应与胃癌发展的交汇点。
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 21;29(15):2222-2240. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i15.2222.
6
Prevalence of Her2-neu status and its clinicopathological association in newly diagnosed gastric cancer patients.新诊断胃癌患者 Her2-neu 状态的流行情况及其与临床病理的关系。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 1;22(1):1114. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10206-1.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in gastric cancer: A 15-year population-based analysis.种族/民族差异与胃癌:一项基于人群的 15 年分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1860-1868. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4997. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
8
Associations of Education Level With Survival Outcomes and Treatment Receipt in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma.教育水平与胃腺癌患者生存结局和治疗接受情况的相关性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:868416. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868416. eCollection 2022.
9
Sociodemographic disparities in gastric cancer and the gastric precancerous cascade: A population-based study.胃癌及胃癌前病变连续过程中的社会人口学差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Mar 25;23:100437. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100437. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparity of Gastric Cancer Patients in Canada.加拿大胃癌患者的地理和社会经济差异。
Curr Oncol. 2021 May 28;28(3):2052-2064. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030190.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2017.韩国癌症统计数据:2017 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和患病率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):335-350. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.206. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
Race/Ethnicity-, Socioeconomic Status-, and Anatomic Subsite-Specific Risks for Gastric Cancer.种族/民族、社会经济地位和解剖部位特异性胃癌风险。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):59-62.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.045. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
3
Can a gastric cancer risk survey identify high-risk patients for endoscopic screening? A pilot study.胃癌风险调查能否识别出内镜筛查的高危患者?一项试点研究。
J Surg Res. 2018 Jul;227:246-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.053. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
C-statistic: A brief explanation of its construction, interpretation and limitations.C统计量:对其构建、解释及局限性的简要说明。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
5
Five-year survival analysis of surgically resected gastric cancer cases in Japan: a retrospective analysis of more than 100,000 patients from the nationwide registry of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2001-2007).日本外科切除胃癌病例的 5 年生存分析:日本胃癌协会全国登记处(2001-2007 年)对超过 10 万名患者的回顾性分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jan;21(1):144-154. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0716-7. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
6
Racial and Ethnic Minorities at Increased Risk for Gastric Cancer in a Regional US Population Study.美国一地区性人群研究显示,少数族裔罹患胃癌的风险更高。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;15(4):511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
Socioeconomic position in childhood and cancer in adulthood: a rapid-review.童年时期的社会经济地位与成年后的癌症:一项快速综述。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jun;70(6):629-34. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206274. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
8
Marital status, education, and income in relation to the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer by histological type and site.婚姻状况、教育程度和收入与组织学类型和部位相关的食管癌和胃癌风险的关系。
Cancer. 2016 Jan 15;122(2):207-12. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29731. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
9
Review article: the epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer.综述文章:胃癌的流行病学和预防。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug;40(3):250-60. doi: 10.1111/apt.12814. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
10
The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.个体及邻里社会经济地位对胃癌生存率的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089655. eCollection 2014.