Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位差异与胃癌及单一 SES 变量预测风险的研究

Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Mar;53(1):170-178. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for gastric cancer (GC). This study seeks to examine education, income, and occupation variables separately to identify the single variable that can be best used to assess SES risk for GC.

METHODS

Data from a case-control survey study were used. Logistic regression models were created for education, income, and occupation adjusted for age, sex, and race. Models were compared using AIC, c-statistics, and pseudo-R square to determine the model that had the highest risk predictive ability.

RESULTS

GC cases had lower education levels and more commonly held jobs in unskilled labor. Annual household income was lower in cases compared to controls. Age, gender, race, education, and occupation were associated with increased risk of GC. The education model adjusted for age, gender, and race found < high school (HS) education to have an OR of 3.18 (95% CI 1.09-9.25) for GC compared to > HS education. The occupation model demonstrated that employment in unskilled labor had OR of 4.32 (95% CI 1.05-17.76) for GC compared to professional occupation. Model fit was best for the education model (AIC: 113.583, lower AIC is better) compared to income (117.562) or occupation (117.032). Education contributed the most to model variability (% delta pseudo-R square (4.7%)) compared to occupation (4.0%) or income (3.8%).

CONCLUSION

Education level was the single most reliable measure of GC risk among 3 SES variables and can be employed as an ideal single indicator of SES-related GC risk when multiple SES factors cannot be obtained.

摘要

简介

社会经济地位(SES)是胃癌(GC)的已知危险因素。本研究旨在分别检查教育、收入和职业变量,以确定可用于评估 GC 的 SES 风险的最佳单一变量。

方法

使用病例对照调查研究的数据。为调整年龄、性别和种族后,为教育、收入和职业创建了逻辑回归模型。使用 AIC、C 统计量和伪 R 平方来比较模型,以确定具有最高风险预测能力的模型。

结果

GC 病例的受教育程度较低,从事非熟练劳动力的工作更为常见。与对照组相比,病例的家庭年收入较低。年龄、性别、种族、教育和职业与 GC 风险增加相关。调整年龄、性别和种族的教育模型发现,与高中学历(HS)相比,未完成 HS 教育的 OR 为 3.18(95%CI 1.09-9.25)。职业模型表明,与专业职业相比,从事非熟练劳动的就业 OR 为 4.32(95%CI 1.05-17.76)。与收入(117.562)或职业(117.032)相比,教育模型的拟合度最佳(AIC:113.583,AIC 越低越好)。与职业(4.0%)或收入(3.8%)相比,教育对模型变异性的贡献最大(%Delta 伪 R 平方(4.7%))。

结论

在 3 个 SES 变量中,教育水平是 GC 风险的唯一最可靠指标,当无法获得多个 SES 因素时,可以将其用作 SES 相关 GC 风险的理想单一指标。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Mar;53(1):170-178. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
7
Association of Race and Family Socioeconomic Status With Pediatric Postoperative Mortality.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222989. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2989.
8
Association of socioeconomic status and exercise capacity in adults with coronary heart disease (from the Heart and Soul Study).
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Feb 15;101(4):462-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.09.093. Epub 2007 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-Related Differences in Gastric Adenocarcinoma from 2000-2020: A SEER Database Analysis.
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Mar 13;56(1):78. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01168-1.
5
Intersections between innate immune response and gastric cancer development.
World J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 21;29(15):2222-2240. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i15.2222.
7
Racial/ethnic disparities in gastric cancer: A 15-year population-based analysis.
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1860-1868. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4997. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
8
Associations of Education Level With Survival Outcomes and Treatment Receipt in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma.
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:868416. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868416. eCollection 2022.
9
Sociodemographic disparities in gastric cancer and the gastric precancerous cascade: A population-based study.
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Mar 25;23:100437. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100437. eCollection 2022 Jun.
10
Geographic and Socioeconomic Disparity of Gastric Cancer Patients in Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2021 May 28;28(3):2052-2064. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030190.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2017.
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):335-350. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.206. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
2
Race/Ethnicity-, Socioeconomic Status-, and Anatomic Subsite-Specific Risks for Gastric Cancer.
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):59-62.e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.045. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
3
Can a gastric cancer risk survey identify high-risk patients for endoscopic screening? A pilot study.
J Surg Res. 2018 Jul;227:246-256. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.053. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
4
C-statistic: A brief explanation of its construction, interpretation and limitations.
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Feb;90:130-132. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.027. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Racial and Ethnic Minorities at Increased Risk for Gastric Cancer in a Regional US Population Study.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;15(4):511-517. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.033. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
7
Socioeconomic position in childhood and cancer in adulthood: a rapid-review.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Jun;70(6):629-34. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206274. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
9
Review article: the epidemiology and prevention of gastric cancer.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug;40(3):250-60. doi: 10.1111/apt.12814. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
10
The effect of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status on gastric cancer survival.
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089655. eCollection 2014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验