• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育水平与胃腺癌患者生存结局和治疗接受情况的相关性。

Associations of Education Level With Survival Outcomes and Treatment Receipt in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Institute of Education, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:868416. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868416. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.868416
PMID:35757623
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9218109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains largely unclear how education level, an important socioeconomic factor, affects prognoses for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). We aimed to demonstrate the associations between education level and clinical outcomes in patients with GAC.

METHODS

We included a total of 30,409 patients diagnosed with GAC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registry database. Education level, household income, unemployment rate, poverty rate, insurance status, and marital status were selected as sociodemographic variables for the comprehensive analysis. Cox and logistic regression models, Kaplan-Meier curves, and subgroup analyses were the primary statistical methods employed.

RESULTS

A low level of education was correlated with less income, higher unemployment rates, and higher poverty rates (all < 0.001). The multivariate Cox analysis indicated that a high education level was significantly associated with superior overall survival rates and cancer-specific survival rates in patients with GAC (both < 0.001). We also corroborated favorable survival outcomes by high education level within almost every clinical and demographic subgroup. Furthermore, chemotherapy combined with surgery could markedly prolong the survival for all patients, including patients of stage IV cancer (both < 0.001). By using multivariable logistic models, patients in counties with high education levels had a higher probability of chemotherapy receipt ( < 0.001). Contrarily, those in the counties with low levels of education were less likely to receive chemotherapy or undergo surgery ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Education level was identified and confirmed as an independent predictor of treatment and survival for GAC patients. Efforts are needed to provide effective interventions for those whose educational status is adverse.

摘要

背景

教育水平作为一个重要的社会经济因素,其对胃腺癌(GAC)患者预后的影响在很大程度上仍不清楚。我们旨在证明教育水平与 GAC 患者临床结局之间的关联。

方法

我们纳入了来自 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 注册数据库的总共 30409 例 GAC 患者。教育程度、家庭收入、失业率、贫困率、保险状况和婚姻状况被选为综合分析的社会人口学变量。主要的统计方法是 Cox 和逻辑回归模型、Kaplan-Meier 曲线和亚组分析。

结果

低教育水平与收入较低、失业率较高和贫困率较高相关(均<0.001)。多变量 Cox 分析表明,高教育水平与 GAC 患者的总生存率和癌症特异性生存率显著相关(均<0.001)。我们还在几乎所有临床和人口统计学亚组中证实了高教育水平与良好的生存结果相关。此外,化疗联合手术可以显著延长所有患者,包括 IV 期癌症患者的生存时间(均<0.001)。通过使用多变量逻辑模型,教育水平较高的县的患者接受化疗的可能性更高(<0.001)。相反,教育水平较低的县的患者接受化疗或手术的可能性较低(<0.001)。

结论

教育水平被确定并证实为 GAC 患者治疗和生存的独立预测因素。需要努力为那些教育状况不利的人提供有效的干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/ad0cc0a43c2e/fpubh-10-868416-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/bfbb05014b03/fpubh-10-868416-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/c8ea43ac51e2/fpubh-10-868416-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/30bc2875de36/fpubh-10-868416-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/4dbd5b7d18fb/fpubh-10-868416-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/ad0cc0a43c2e/fpubh-10-868416-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/bfbb05014b03/fpubh-10-868416-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/c8ea43ac51e2/fpubh-10-868416-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/30bc2875de36/fpubh-10-868416-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/4dbd5b7d18fb/fpubh-10-868416-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19ac/9218109/ad0cc0a43c2e/fpubh-10-868416-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Associations of Education Level With Survival Outcomes and Treatment Receipt in Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma.教育水平与胃腺癌患者生存结局和治疗接受情况的相关性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:868416. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.868416. eCollection 2022.
2
Nomogram for predicting the survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients who receive surgery and chemotherapy.预测接受手术和化疗的胃腺癌患者生存情况的列线图。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6495-2.
3
Better Prognosis of Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Than Gastric Adenocarcinoma among Whites in the United States: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis Based on SEER.美国白人中胃神经内分泌癌的预后优于胃腺癌:基于 SEER 的倾向评分匹配分析。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Jul 11;29(7):4879-4892. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29070387.
4
The addition of chemoradiation to adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in lymph node-positive gastric cancer.辅助化疗联合放化疗可改善淋巴结阳性胃癌患者的生存。
Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
5
Insurance status and level of education predict disparities in receipt of treatment and survival for anal squamous cell carcinoma.保险状况和教育水平可预测肛门鳞状细胞癌治疗接受情况和生存率的差异。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;67:101723. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101723. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Patient education-level affects treatment allocation and prognosis in esophageal- and gastroesophageal junctional cancer in Sweden.在瑞典,患者的教育水平会影响食管癌和胃食管交界癌的治疗分配及预后。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;52:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
7
Significance of NQO1 overexpression for prognostic evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma.NQO1 过表达对胃腺癌预后评估的意义。
Exp Mol Pathol. 2014 Apr;96(2):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2013.12.008. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
8
Reduced Expression of Deubiquitinase USP33 Is Associated with Tumor Progression and Poor Prognosis of Gastric Adenocarcinoma.去泛素化酶 USP33 的表达降低与胃腺癌的肿瘤进展和不良预后相关。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 May 26;24:3496-3505. doi: 10.12659/MSM.908075.
9
Does chemoradiotherapy improve outcomes for surgically resected adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagus?手术切除的胃或食管腺癌患者采用放化疗治疗是否能改善预后?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jan;17(1):98-108. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0679-y. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
10
Is advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma a distinct entity from intestinal subtype gastric cancer? Data from the AGAMENON-SEOM Registry.高级食管腺癌是否与肠型胃癌不同?AGAMENON-SEOM 登记处的数据。
Gastric Cancer. 2021 Jul;24(4):926-936. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01169-6. Epub 2021 Mar 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Quality of Discharge Teaching and Post-Discharge Coping Difficulty in Postoperative Lung Cancer Patients: A Chain Mediation Model.肺癌术后患者出院指导质量与出院后应对困难的关联:链式中介模型
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 18;32(8):468. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080468.
2
Social determinants of health and upper gastrointestinal cancer outcomes in the United States: a systematic review.美国健康的社会决定因素与上消化道癌症结局:一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 19;12:1477028. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477028. eCollection 2024.
3
Gender Differences in Self-Advocacy Among Cancer Survivors: How Women and Men Vary in How They Learn to Engage in Decision-Making and Social Support.

本文引用的文献

1
Gastrectomy for stage IV gastric cancer: a comparison of different treatment strategies from the SEER database.胃第四期胃癌之胃切除术:从 SEER 资料库比较不同治疗策略。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 30;11(1):7150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86352-6.
2
Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer.胃癌的当前治疗方法和最新进展。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):264-279. doi: 10.3322/caac.21657. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
3
Current status of conversion surgery for stage IV gastric cancer.IV 期胃癌转化手术的现状。
癌症幸存者自我维权中的性别差异:男性与女性在学习参与决策和社会支持方式上的不同表现
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Nov 2. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02536-4.
4
Effects of recipient education disparity on living donor kidney transplant outcomes across different ethnic groups: a retrospective study in the United States.受者教育程度差异对不同种族活体肾移植结果的影响:美国的一项回顾性研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Jul 31;12(7):1137-1154. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-288. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
5
The quality of life in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: A longitudinal study.鼻咽癌放疗中的生活质量:一项纵向研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 May 26;10(7):100251. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100251. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Surg Today. 2021 Nov;51(11):1736-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02222-0. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Socioeconomic Disparities in Gastric Cancer and Identification of a Single SES Variable for Predicting Risk.社会经济地位差异与胃癌及单一 SES 变量预测风险的研究
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2022 Mar;53(1):170-178. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00564-z. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
6
Education level as a predictor of survival in patients with multiple myeloma.教育水平对多发性骨髓瘤患者生存的预测作用。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07178-5.
7
Socioeconomic Status and Access to Healthcare: Interrelated Drivers for Healthy Aging.社会经济地位与医疗保健获取:健康老龄化的相互关联驱动因素。
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;8:231. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00231. eCollection 2020.
8
A Population-Based Analysis of Distant Metastasis in Stage IV Gastric Cancer.基于人群的 IV 期胃癌远处转移分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 May 15;26:e923867. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923867.
9
Insurance status and level of education predict disparities in receipt of treatment and survival for anal squamous cell carcinoma.保险状况和教育水平可预测肛门鳞状细胞癌治疗接受情况和生存率的差异。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;67:101723. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101723. Epub 2020 May 11.
10
Socio-Demographic Disparities in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study.胃腺癌的社会人口学差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 9;12(1):157. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010157.