Department of Spine Sugery, Shanxi, Xi'an Jiaotong University Affiliated Honghui Hospital, No.555, Youyi Road, Beilin District, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
BMC Surg. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-01013-1.
Symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) are increasing, as are acute and chronic pain episodes and progressive spinal deformities. However, there are no clear surgical treatment criteria for patients with these different symptoms. Therefore, this study aims to explore the surgical approaches for the treatment of OVCF with different symptoms and evaluate the feasibility of these surgical approaches.
We retrospectively analyzed 238 symptomatic OVCF patients who entered our hospital from June 2013 to 2016. According to clinical characteristics and imaging examinations, these patients were divided into I-V grades and their corresponding surgical methods were developed. I, old vertebral fracture with no apparent instability, vertebral augmentation; II, old vertebral fracture with local instability, posterior reduction fusion internal fixation; III, old fractures with spinal stenosis, posterior decompression and reduction fusion and internal fixation; IV, old vertebral fracture with kyphosis, posterior osteotomy with internal fixation and fusion; V, a mixture of the above types, posterior osteotomy (decompression) with internal fixation and fusion. Postoperative visual analog score (VAS), oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, sagittal index (SI) and ASIA grades of neurological function were observed.
All 238 patients were followed up for 12-38 months, with an average follow-up of 18.5 months. After graded surgery, the VAS score, ODI score, and vertebral sagittal index SI of 238 patients were significantly improved, and the difference between the last follow-up results and the preoperative comparison was statistically significant (P ˂ 0.05). Besides, the postoperative ASIA grades of 16 patients with nerve injury were improved from 14 patients with preoperative grade C, 2 patients with grade D to 4 patients with postoperative grade D and 12 patients with postoperative grade E.
In this study, we concluded that graded surgery could better treat symptomatic old OVCF and restore spinal stability. This provides clinical reference and guidance for the treatment of symptomatic old OVCF in the future.
症状性骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)的发生率不断增加,同时伴有急性和慢性疼痛发作以及进行性脊柱畸形。然而,对于这些不同症状的患者,目前尚无明确的手术治疗标准。因此,本研究旨在探讨不同症状性 OVCF 的手术治疗方法,并评估这些手术方法的可行性。
我们回顾性分析了 2013 年 6 月至 2016 年期间我院收治的 238 例症状性 OVCF 患者。根据临床特征和影像学检查,将这些患者分为 I-V 级,并制定相应的手术方法。I 级,陈旧性骨折无明显不稳定,椎体增强;II 级,陈旧性骨折局部不稳定,后路复位融合内固定;III 级,陈旧性骨折合并椎管狭窄,后路减压复位融合内固定;IV 级,陈旧性骨折合并后凸畸形,后路截骨内固定融合;V 级,上述类型混合,后路截骨(减压)内固定融合。观察术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)评分、矢状指数(SI)和 ASIA 神经功能分级。
238 例患者均获得随访,随访时间 12-38 个月,平均 18.5 个月。分级手术后,238 例患者的 VAS 评分、ODI 评分和椎体矢状指数 SI 均明显改善,末次随访结果与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P ˂ 0.05)。此外,16 例神经损伤患者的 ASIA 分级术后由术前 C 级的 14 例、D 级的 2 例改善为术后 D 级的 4 例和 E 级的 12 例。
本研究认为分级手术能更好地治疗症状性陈旧性 OVCF,恢复脊柱稳定性。这为今后症状性陈旧性 OVCF 的治疗提供了临床参考和指导。