School of Public Policy and Management, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, China.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01363-5.
Since 2015, all pilot cities of public hospital reform in China have allowed the zero-markup drug policy and implemented the policy of Separating of Hospital Revenue from Drug Sales (SHRDS). The objective of this study is to evaluate whether SHRDS policy reduces the burden on patients, and to identify the mechanism through which SHRDS policy affects healthcare expenditure.
In this study, we use large sample data of urban employee's healthcare insurance in Chengdu, and adopt the difference in difference model (DID) to estimate the impact of the SHRDS policy on total healthcare expenditures and drug expenditure of patients, and to provide empirical evidence for deepening medical and health system reform in China.
After the SHRDS policy's implementation, the total healthcare expenditure kept growing, but the growth rate slowed down between 2014 to 2015. The total healthcare expenditure of patients decreased by only 0.6%, the actual reimbursement expenditure of patients decreased by 4.1%, the reimbursement ratio decreased by 2.6%. and the drugs expenditure dropped by 14.4%. However, the examinations expenditure increased by 18.2%, material expenditure increased significantly by 38.5%, and nursing expenditure increased by 12.7%.
After implementing the SHRDS policy, the significant reduction in drug expenditure led to more physicians inducing patients' healthcare service needs, and the increased social healthcare burden was partially transferred to the patients' personal economic burden through the decline in the reimbursement ratio. The SHRDS policy is not an effective way to control healthcare expenditure.
自 2015 年以来,中国公立医院改革的所有试点城市都允许实行零差率药品政策,并实施了“医药分开”政策。本研究的目的是评估“医药分开”政策是否减轻了患者的负担,并确定该政策影响医疗支出的机制。
本研究使用了成都市城镇职工医疗保险的大样本数据,采用双重差分模型(DID)来估计“医药分开”政策对患者总医疗支出和药品支出的影响,为中国深化医疗卫生体制改革提供经验证据。
“医药分开”政策实施后,总医疗支出持续增长,但 2014 年至 2015 年的增长速度有所放缓。患者的总医疗支出仅下降了 0.6%,实际患者报销支出下降了 4.1%,报销比例下降了 2.6%,药品支出下降了 14.4%。然而,检查支出增加了 18.2%,材料支出显著增加了 38.5%,护理支出增加了 12.7%。
实施“医药分开”政策后,药品支出的显著减少导致医生更多地诱导患者的医疗服务需求,而报销比例的下降将部分增加的社会医疗负担转嫁给了患者的个人经济负担。“医药分开”政策不是控制医疗支出的有效途径。