State Key Laboratory of Dampness Syndrome of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, PO Box 510120, 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, China.
Program for Outcome Assessment in TCM, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, PO Box 510120, 111 Dade Road, Guangzhou, China.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01636-1.
Pediatric Tuina has been widely used in children with acute diarrhea in China. However, due to the lack of high-quality clinical evidence, the benefit of Tuina as a therapy is not clear. We aimed to assess the effect of pediatric Tuina compared with sham Tuina as an add-on therapy in addition to usual care for 0-6-year-old children with acute diarrhea.
Eighty-six participants aged 0-6 years with acute diarrhea were randomized to receive pediatric Tuina plus usual care (n = 43) or sham Tuina plus usual care (n = 43). The primary outcomes were days of diarrhea from baseline and times of diarrhea on day 3. Secondary outcomes included a global change rating (GCR) and the number of days when the stool characteristics returned to normal. Adverse events were assessed.
Pediatric Tuina was associated with a reduction in times of diarrhea on day 3 compared with sham Tuina in both ITT (crude RR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59-0.91]) and PP analyses (crude RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.83]). However, the results were not significant when we adjusted for social demographic and clinical characteristics. No significant difference was found between groups in days of diarrhea, global change rating, or number of days when the stool characteristics returned to normal.
In children aged 0-6 years with acute diarrhea, pediatric Tuina showed significant effects in terms of reducing times of diarrhea compared with sham Tuina. Studies with larger sample sizes and adjusted trial designs are warranted to further evaluate the effect of pediatric Tuina therapy.
Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03005821 , Data of registration: 2016-12-29.
小儿推拿在中国被广泛应用于儿童急性腹泻的治疗。然而,由于缺乏高质量的临床证据,推拿作为一种治疗方法的益处尚不清楚。我们旨在评估小儿推拿与假推拿作为附加治疗在常规护理的基础上对 0-6 岁急性腹泻儿童的疗效。
86 名 0-6 岁的急性腹泻患儿被随机分为接受小儿推拿加常规护理(n=43)或假推拿加常规护理(n=43)。主要结局是从基线开始腹泻的天数和第 3 天腹泻的次数。次要结局包括整体变化评分(GCR)和粪便特征恢复正常的天数。评估不良事件。
在 ITT 分析(校正 RR,0.73[95%CI,0.59-0.91])和 PP 分析(校正 RR,0.66[95%CI,0.53-0.83])中,与假推拿相比,小儿推拿与第 3 天腹泻次数减少有关。然而,当我们调整社会人口学和临床特征时,结果没有统计学意义。两组在腹泻天数、整体变化评分或粪便特征恢复正常的天数方面无显著差异。
在 0-6 岁的急性腹泻儿童中,与假推拿相比,小儿推拿在减少腹泻次数方面显示出显著的效果。需要更大样本量和调整试验设计的研究来进一步评估小儿推拿治疗的效果。
Clinicaltrials.gov,标识符:NCT03005821,注册日期:2016 年 12 月 29 日。