• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

BATT 评分用于院前创伤性出血性死亡风险分层的验证:对于氨甲环酸治疗标准的有用性。

Validation of the BATT score for prehospital risk stratification of traumatic haemorrhagic death: usefulness for tranexamic acid treatment criteria.

机构信息

Clinical Trials Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 6;29(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00827-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13049-020-00827-5
PMID:33407716
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7789642/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tranexamic acid reduces surgical blood loss and reduces deaths from bleeding in trauma patients. Tranexamic acid must be given urgently, preferably by paramedics at the scene of the injury or in the ambulance. We developed a simple score (Bleeding Audit Triage Trauma score) to predict death from bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted an external validation of the BATT score using data from the UK Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. We evaluated the impact of tranexamic acid treatment thresholds in trauma patients.

RESULTS

We included 104,862 trauma patients with an injury severity score of 9 or above. Tranexamic acid was administered to 9915 (9%) patients. Of these 5185 (52%) received prehospital tranexamic acid. The BATT score had good accuracy (Brier score = 6%) and good discrimination (C-statistic 0.90; 95% CI 0.89-0.91). Calibration in the large showed no substantial difference between predicted and observed death due to bleeding (1.15% versus 1.16%, P = 0.81). Pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment of trauma patients with a BATT score of 2 or more would avoid 210 bleeding deaths by treating 61,598 patients instead of avoiding 55 deaths by treating 9915 as currently.

CONCLUSION

The BATT score identifies trauma patient at risk of significant haemorrhage. A score of 2 or more would be an appropriate threshold for pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment.

摘要

背景

氨甲环酸可减少手术失血量,并降低创伤患者因出血导致的死亡。氨甲环酸必须紧急给予,最好由现场急救人员或救护车上的急救人员给予。我们开发了一种简单的评分(出血评估分诊创伤评分)来预测出血导致的死亡。

方法

我们使用英国创伤审核研究网络(TARN)2017 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日的数据,对 BATT 评分进行了外部验证。我们评估了创伤患者氨甲环酸治疗阈值的影响。

结果

我们纳入了 104862 名损伤严重程度评分≥9 分的创伤患者。9915 名(9%)患者给予了氨甲环酸。其中 5185 名(52%)患者接受了院前氨甲环酸治疗。BATT 评分具有良好的准确性(Brier 评分=6%)和良好的区分度(C 统计量 0.90;95%CI 0.89-0.91)。大样本校准显示,预计和观察到的出血性死亡之间没有实质性差异(1.15%比 1.16%,P=0.81)。院前给予 BATT 评分≥2 分的创伤患者氨甲环酸治疗,可通过治疗 61598 名患者来避免 210 例出血性死亡,而不是通过治疗 9915 名患者来避免 55 例死亡。

结论

BATT 评分可识别出有发生大出血风险的创伤患者。评分≥2 分可能是院前给予氨甲环酸治疗的适当阈值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/142d7853f0d1/13049_2020_827_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/05f1074daeec/13049_2020_827_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/ade211eb5193/13049_2020_827_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/142d7853f0d1/13049_2020_827_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/05f1074daeec/13049_2020_827_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/ade211eb5193/13049_2020_827_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61a8/7789642/142d7853f0d1/13049_2020_827_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the BATT score for prehospital risk stratification of traumatic haemorrhagic death: usefulness for tranexamic acid treatment criteria.BATT 评分用于院前创伤性出血性死亡风险分层的验证:对于氨甲环酸治疗标准的有用性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 6;29(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00827-5.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict death in patients with traumatic bleeding, and evaluation of the effect of tranexamic acid on mortality according to baseline risk: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.创伤性出血患者死亡预测预后模型的建立和验证,以及根据基线风险评估氨甲环酸对死亡率影响的评价:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(24):1-45, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta17240.
3
Evaluation of the prehospital administration of tranexamic acid for injured patients: a state-wide observational study with sex and age-disaggregated analysis.创伤患者院前使用氨甲环酸的评估:一项全州范围的观察性研究,包括性别和年龄细分分析。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):452-458. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213806.
4
The CRASH-2 trial: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of the effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events and transfusion requirement in bleeding trauma patients.CRASH-2 试验:氨甲环酸对出血创伤患者死亡、血管阻塞事件和输血需求影响的随机对照试验和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Mar;17(10):1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta17100.
5
The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial.氨甲环酸治疗创伤出血患者的早期治疗的重要性:CRASH-2 随机对照试验的探索性分析。
Lancet. 2011 Mar 26;377(9771):1096-101, 1101.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60278-X.
6
Early identification of bleeding in trauma patients: external validation of traumatic bleeding scores in the Swiss Trauma Registry.创伤患者出血的早期识别:瑞士创伤登记处创伤性出血评分的外部验证。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 28;26(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04178-8.
7
Effect of tranexamic acid on mortality in patients with traumatic bleeding: prespecified analysis of data from randomised controlled trial.氨甲环酸对创伤性出血患者死亡率的影响:来自随机对照试验的数据的预设分析。
BMJ. 2012 Sep 11;345:e5839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5839.
8
Tranexamic acid to improve functional status in adults with spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage: the TICH-2 RCT.氨甲环酸改善自发性脑出血成人的功能状态:TICH-2 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jul;23(35):1-48. doi: 10.3310/hta23350.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Prehospital Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock: Outcomes of the Cal-PAT Study.氨甲环酸在院前创伤性失血性休克中的疗效与安全性:加州院前创伤性失血性休克研究(Cal-PAT Study)的结果
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):673-683. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.2.32044. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
10
Tranexamic acid in trauma: how should we use it?氨甲环酸在创伤中的应用:我们应该如何使用它?
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13 Suppl 1:S195-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12878.

引用本文的文献

1
Tranexamic acid in trauma: A joint position statement and resource document of NAEMSP, ACEP, and ACS-COT.氨甲环酸在创伤中的应用:美国急诊医师协会、美国急诊医师学会和美国外科医师学会创伤委员会的联合立场声明及资源文件
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025 Sep 1;99(3):357-363. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004727. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
2
Validation of the FASILA Score for Predicting Interventions and Outcomes in Traumatic Abdominal and Pelvic Injuries: A Prospective Clinical Study.用于预测创伤性腹部和盆腔损伤干预措施及预后的FASILA评分的验证:一项前瞻性临床研究
World J Surg. 2025 Jul;49(7):1951-1959. doi: 10.1002/wjs.12632. Epub 2025 May 19.
3
Derivation and validation of the simplified BleedingAudit Triage Trauma (sBATT) score: a simplified trauma score for major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions.

本文引用的文献

1
Tranexamic Acid During Prehospital Transport in Patients at Risk for Hemorrhage After Injury: A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.创伤后出血风险患者院前转运期间使用氨甲环酸:一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 5;156(1):11-20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4350.
2
Pharmacokinetics of intramuscular tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: a clinical trial.肌内注射氨甲环酸治疗创伤出血患者的药代动力学:一项临床试验。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.07.058. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
3
Effect of Out-of-Hospital Tranexamic Acid vs Placebo on 6-Month Functional Neurologic Outcomes in Patients With Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.
简化的出血审计分诊创伤(sBATT)评分的推导与验证:一种用于机动车碰撞受伤的重大创伤患者的简化创伤评分
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 26;14(12):e090517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090517.
4
Prehospital undertriage of older injured patients in western Switzerland: an observational cross-sectional study.瑞士西部院前对老年受伤患者的分类:一项观察性横断面研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 8;32(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01271-5.
5
Urgent action needed on prehospital tranexamic acid in trauma.创伤院前使用氨甲环酸需采取紧急行动。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):450-451. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2024-214194.
6
Evaluation of the prehospital administration of tranexamic acid for injured patients: a state-wide observational study with sex and age-disaggregated analysis.创伤患者院前使用氨甲环酸的评估:一项全州范围的观察性研究,包括性别和年龄细分分析。
Emerg Med J. 2024 Jul 22;41(8):452-458. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213806.
7
The use of whole body computed tomography does not lead to increased 24-h mortality in severely injured patients in circulatory shock.对于循环性休克的重伤患者,使用全身计算机断层扫描并不会导致24小时死亡率增加。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 25;14(1):2169. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52657-5.
8
The predictive value of four traumatic hemorrhage scores for early massive blood transfusion in trauma patients in the pre-hospital setting.四种创伤性出血评分对创伤患者院前早期大量输血的预测价值。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):967-973. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02412-8. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
9
Factors that influence the administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) to trauma patients in prehospital settings: a systematic review.影响创伤患者在院前环境下使用氨甲环酸(TXA)的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 31;13(5):e073075. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073075.
10
Early identification of bleeding in trauma patients: external validation of traumatic bleeding scores in the Swiss Trauma Registry.创伤患者出血的早期识别:瑞士创伤登记处创伤性出血评分的外部验证。
Crit Care. 2022 Sep 28;26(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04178-8.
院外使用氨甲环酸与安慰剂对中重度创伤性脑损伤患者 6 个月神经功能结局的影响。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 8;324(10):961-974. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8958.
4
Effect of tranexamic acid by baseline risk of death in acute bleeding patients: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data from 28 333 patients.氨甲环酸对急性出血患者死亡风险的影响:来自 28333 名患者的个体患者水平数据的荟萃分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jun;124(6):676-683. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.020. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
5
Health economics of Patient Blood Management: a cost-benefit analysis based on a meta-analysis.患者血液管理的健康经济学:基于荟萃分析的成本效益分析。
Vox Sang. 2020 Feb;115(2):182-188. doi: 10.1111/vox.12873. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
Validation of clinical prediction models: what does the "calibration slope" really measure?临床预测模型的验证:“校准斜率”到底在衡量什么?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;118:93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.09.016. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
7
Prognostic model for traumatic death due to bleeding: cross-sectional international study.创伤性出血致死的预后模型:国际横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026823.
8
The effects of misclassification in routine healthcare databases on the accuracy of prognostic prediction models: a case study of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in atrial fibrillation.常规医疗保健数据库中的错误分类对预后预测模型准确性的影响:以心房颤动的CHA2DS2-VASc评分为例的案例研究
Diagn Progn Res. 2017 Nov 16;1:18. doi: 10.1186/s41512-017-0018-x. eCollection 2017.
9
Empirical evidence of the impact of study characteristics on the performance of prediction models: a meta-epidemiological study.基于观察性研究的预测模型性能的影响因素的实证证据:一项汇总流行病学研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):e026160. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026160.
10
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition.欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南:第五版。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 27;23(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2347-3.