Guyette Francis X, Brown Joshua B, Zenati Mazen S, Early-Young Barbara J, Adams Peter W, Eastridge Brian J, Nirula Raminder, Vercruysse Gary A, O'Keeffe Terence, Joseph Bellal, Alarcon Louis H, Callaway Clifton W, Zuckerbraun Brian S, Neal Matthew D, Forsythe Raquel M, Rosengart Matthew R, Billiar Timothy R, Yealy Donald M, Peitzman Andrew B, Sperry Jason L
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Division of Trauma and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Pittsburgh Trauma Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Surg. 2020 Oct 5;156(1):11-20. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.4350.
In-hospital administration of tranexamic acid after injury improves outcomes in patients at risk for hemorrhage. Data demonstrating the benefit and safety of the pragmatic use of tranexamic acid in the prehospital phase of care are lacking for these patients.
To assess the effectiveness and safety of tranexamic acid administered before hospitalization compared with placebo in injured patients at risk for hemorrhage.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pragmatic, phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority randomized clinical trial included injured patients with prehospital hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg) or tachycardia (heart rate ≥110/min) before arrival at 1 of 4 US level 1 trauma centers, within an estimated 2 hours of injury, from May 1, 2015, through October 31, 2019.
Patients received 1 g of tranexamic acid before hospitalization (447 patients) or placebo (456 patients) infused for 10 minutes in 100 mL of saline. The randomization scheme used prehospital and in-hospital phase assignments, and patients administered tranexamic acid were allocated to abbreviated, standard, and repeat bolus dosing regimens on trauma center arrival.
The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality.
In all, 927 patients (mean [SD] age, 42 [18] years; 686 [74.0%] male) were eligible for prehospital enrollment (460 randomized to tranexamic acid intervention; 467 to placebo intervention). After exclusions, the intention-to-treat study cohort comprised 903 patients: 447 in the tranexamic acid arm and 456 in the placebo arm. Mortality at 30 days was 8.1% in patients receiving tranexamic acid compared with 9.9% in patients receiving placebo (difference, -1.8%; 95% CI, -5.6% to 1.9%; P = .17). Results of Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, accounting for site, verified that randomization to tranexamic acid was not associated with a significant reduction in 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.59-1.11, P = .18). Prespecified dosing regimens and post-hoc subgroup analyses found that prehospital tranexamic acid were associated with significantly lower 30-day mortality. When comparing tranexamic acid effect stratified by time to treatment and qualifying shock severity in a post hoc comparison, 30-day mortality was lower when tranexamic acid was administered within 1 hour of injury (4.6% vs 7.6%; difference, -3.0%; 95% CI, -5.7% to -0.3%; P < .002). Patients with severe shock (systolic blood pressure ≤70 mm Hg) who received tranexamic acid demonstrated lower 30-day mortality compared with placebo (18.5% vs 35.5%; difference, -17%; 95% CI, -25.8% to -8.1%; P < .003).
In injured patients at risk for hemorrhage, tranexamic acid administered before hospitalization did not result in significantly lower 30-day mortality. The prehospital administration of tranexamic acid after injury did not result in a higher incidence of thrombotic complications or adverse events. Tranexamic acid given to injured patients at risk for hemorrhage in the prehospital setting is safe and associated with survival benefit in specific subgroups of patients.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02086500.
受伤后在医院内给予氨甲环酸可改善有出血风险患者的预后。目前缺乏数据证明在院前护理阶段实际应用氨甲环酸对这些患者的益处和安全性。
评估在有出血风险的受伤患者中,与安慰剂相比,住院前给予氨甲环酸的有效性和安全性。
设计、地点和参与者:这项实用的3期多中心双盲安慰剂对照优效性随机临床试验纳入了在2015年5月1日至2019年10月31日期间,在美国4个一级创伤中心之一就诊、受伤后估计2小时内出现院前低血压(收缩压≤90 mmHg)或心动过速(心率≥110次/分钟)的受伤患者。
患者在住院前接受1 g氨甲环酸(447例患者)或安慰剂(456例患者),溶于100 mL生理盐水中静脉输注10分钟。随机分组方案采用院前和院内阶段分配,在创伤中心就诊时,给予氨甲环酸的患者被分配到简化、标准和重复推注给药方案。
主要结局是30天全因死亡率。
共有927例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,42[18]岁;686[74.0%]为男性)符合院前入组标准(460例随机接受氨甲环酸干预;467例接受安慰剂干预)。排除后,意向性分析研究队列包括903例患者:氨甲环酸组447例,安慰剂组456例。接受氨甲环酸治疗的患者30天死亡率为8.1%,接受安慰剂治疗的患者为9.9%(差异为-1.8%;95%置信区间,-5.6%至1.9%;P = 0.17)。考虑到研究地点的Cox比例风险回归分析结果证实,随机接受氨甲环酸治疗与30天死亡率的显著降低无关(风险比,0.81;95%置信区间,0.59 - 1.11,P = 0.18)。预设的给药方案和事后亚组分析发现,院前给予氨甲环酸与显著降低的30天死亡率相关。在事后比较中,按治疗时间和符合标准的休克严重程度分层比较氨甲环酸的效果时,受伤后1小时内给予氨甲环酸的患者30天死亡率较低(4.6%对7.6%;差异为-3.0%;95%置信区间,-5.7%至-0.3%;P < 0.002)。与安慰剂相比,接受氨甲环酸治疗的严重休克患者(收缩压≤70 mmHg)30天死亡率较低(18.5%对35.5%;差异为-17%;95%置信区间,-25.8%至-8.1%;P < 0.003)。
在有出血风险的受伤患者中,住院前给予氨甲环酸并未显著降低30天死亡率。受伤后院前给予氨甲环酸并未导致血栓形成并发症或不良事件的发生率更高。在院前环境中,给予有出血风险的受伤患者氨甲环酸是安全的,并且在特定亚组患者中与生存获益相关。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02086500。