• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

培养阴性和培养阳性脓毒性休克的特征和临床结局:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil., Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2021 Jan 6;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03421-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-020-03421-4
PMID:33407768
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7787242/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive septic shock.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of data from a prospective registry from 2014 to 2018. A total of 2,499 adult patients with septic shock were enrolled. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, a requirement for mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 1,718 patients with septic shock, 1,012 (58.9%) patients were culture-positive (blood 803, urine 302, sputum 102, others 204) and the median pathogen detection time was 9.5 h (aerobic 10.2 h and anaerobic 9.0 h). The most common site of culture-positive infection was the hepatobiliary tract (39.5%), while for the culture-negative it was the lower respiratory tract (38.2%). The culture-negative group had a lower mean body temperature (37.3 vs 37.7 ℃), lactate (2.5 vs. 3.2 mmol/L), C-reactive protein (11.1 vs 11.9 mg/dL), and sequential organ failure assessment score (7.0 vs. 8.0) than that of the culture-positive group. However, 90-day mortality between the groups was not significantly different (32.7 vs 32.2%, p = 0.83), and the other clinical outcomes also did not differ significantly. Moreover, a shorter culture detection time was correlated with a higher sequential organ failure assessment score but not with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with septic shock are frequently culture-negative, especially in cases where the infection focus is in the lower respiratory tract. Although culture-negative was associated with a degree of organ dysfunction, it was not an independent predictor of death.

摘要

背景

我们评估了培养阴性与培养阳性感染性休克的特征和结局。

方法

我们对 2014 年至 2018 年前瞻性登记研究的数据进行了回顾性观察研究。共纳入 2499 例成人感染性休克患者。主要结局为 90 天死亡率,次要结局为住院时间、机械通气或肾脏替代治疗的需求以及院内死亡率。

结果

在 1718 例感染性休克患者中,1012 例(58.9%)为培养阳性(血 803 例,尿 302 例,痰 102 例,其他部位 204 例),中位病原体检测时间为 9.5 小时(需氧菌 10.2 小时,厌氧菌 9.0 小时)。培养阳性感染最常见的部位是肝胆系统(39.5%),而培养阴性感染最常见的部位是下呼吸道(38.2%)。培养阴性组的平均体温(37.3℃比 37.7℃)、乳酸(2.5mmol/L 比 3.2mmol/L)、C 反应蛋白(11.1mg/dL 比 11.9mg/dL)和序贯器官衰竭评估评分(7.0 分比 8.0 分)均低于培养阳性组。然而,两组 90 天死亡率无显著差异(32.7%比 32.2%,p=0.83),其他临床结局也无显著差异。此外,较短的培养检测时间与较高的序贯器官衰竭评估评分相关,但与死亡率无关。

结论

感染性休克患者常为培养阴性,尤其是感染部位在下呼吸道时。尽管培养阴性与一定程度的器官功能障碍相关,但它不是死亡的独立预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/64652746d685/13054_2020_3421_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/284cc5a3102f/13054_2020_3421_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/9489b412ca16/13054_2020_3421_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/6636b5356d82/13054_2020_3421_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/64652746d685/13054_2020_3421_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/284cc5a3102f/13054_2020_3421_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/9489b412ca16/13054_2020_3421_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/6636b5356d82/13054_2020_3421_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51bd/7789509/64652746d685/13054_2020_3421_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Characteristics and clinical outcomes of culture-negative and culture-positive septic shock: a single-center retrospective cohort study.培养阴性和培养阳性脓毒性休克的特征和临床结局:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2021 Jan 6;25(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03421-4.
2
Prognosis of patients excluded by the definition of septic shock based on their lactate levels after initial fluid resuscitation: a prospective multi-center observational study.基于初始液体复苏后乳酸水平对脓毒性休克定义排除的患者的预后:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Crit Care. 2018 Feb 24;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1935-3.
3
[Combined prognostic value of serum lactic acid, procalcitonin and severity score for short-term prognosis of septic shock patients].[血清乳酸、降钙素原及严重程度评分对脓毒症休克患者短期预后的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2021 Mar;33(3):281-285. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20201113-00715.
4
[Lactic acid, lactate clearance and procalcitonin in assessing the severity and predicting prognosis in sepsis].[乳酸、乳酸清除率及降钙素原在评估脓毒症严重程度及预测预后中的作用]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Apr;32(4):449-453. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200129-00086.
5
Comparison of culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阴性菌血症和阳性菌血症或感染性休克的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Crit Care. 2021 May 8;25(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03592-8.
6
[Improvement effect of early goal-directed therapy on the prognosis in patients with septic shock].早期目标导向治疗对感染性休克患者预后的改善作用
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):899-905.
7
Culture-Negative Septic Shock Compared With Culture-Positive Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.文化阴性感染性休克与文化阳性感染性休克的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):506-512. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002924.
8
Risk factors for mortality in patients with low lactate level and septic shock.低乳酸血症合并感染性休克患者的死亡危险因素。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2019 Jun;52(3):418-425. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
9
Fluid balance correlates with clinical course of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and mortality in patients with septic shock.在感染性休克患者中,液体平衡与多器官功能障碍综合征的临床病程和死亡率相关。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 2;14(12):e0225423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225423. eCollection 2019.
10
[Clinical analysis of septic shock caused by acute upper and lower gastrointestinal perforation].[急性上、下消化道穿孔所致感染性休克的临床分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Aug;32(8):943-946. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200417-00312.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Septic Shock in the Adult Medical Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital in Ethiopia: A Prospective Observational Study.埃塞俄比亚一家三级医院成人医学重症监护病房感染性休克患者的特征及院内结局:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 15;8(7):e71064. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71064. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Culture-negative sepsis may be a different entity from culture-positive sepsis: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.培养阴性脓毒症可能与培养阳性脓毒症不同:一项前瞻性全国多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Nov 25;28(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05151-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study.全球、地区和国家脓毒症发病率和死亡率,1990-2017 年:全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
2
Impact of timing to source control in patients with septic shock: A prospective multi-center observational study.脓毒性休克患者来源控制时机的影响:一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:176-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
3
Time to positivity of blood culture is a risk factor for clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia children: a retrospective study.
Necrotizing fasciitis resembled acute coronary syndrome: A case report.
坏死性筋膜炎酷似急性冠状动脉综合征:一例报告。
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Oct 31;12(11):e9513. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9513. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Effect of low vs. high vancomycin trough level on the clinical outcomes of adult patients with sepsis or gram-positive bacterial infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.低与高万古霉素谷浓度对脓毒症或革兰阳性菌感染成年患者临床结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1114. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09927-4.
5
Evaluation of 16S-Based Metagenomic NGS as Diagnostic Tool in Different Types of Culture-Negative Infections.评估基于16S的宏基因组二代测序作为不同类型培养阴性感染诊断工具的效能
Pathogens. 2024 Aug 30;13(9):743. doi: 10.3390/pathogens13090743.
6
Lactate/Pyruvate Ratio as an Early Predictor of Mortality in Patients with Sepsis: A Cohort Study.乳酸/丙酮酸比值作为脓毒症患者死亡率的早期预测指标:一项队列研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 21;13(18):5597. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185597.
7
Impact of Appropriate Empirical Antibiotic Treatment on the Clinical Response of Septic Patients in Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Observational Study.适当的经验性抗生素治疗对重症监护病房脓毒症患者临床反应的影响:一项单中心观察性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;13(6):569. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13060569.
8
Comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with sepsis identified by the Sepsis-3 criteria by blood and urine culture results: A multicentre retrospective cohort study.根据血培养和尿培养结果,采用Sepsis-3标准识别的脓毒症患者的临床特征与预后比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;7(6):e2162. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2162. eCollection 2024 Jun.
9
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers in Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis Patients.培养阳性与培养阴性脓毒症患者的临床特征及生物标志物比较
Cureus. 2024 Apr 21;16(4):e58682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.58682. eCollection 2024 Apr.
10
The microbial pathology of maternal perinatal sepsis: A single-institution retrospective five-year review.围生期产妇脓毒症的微生物病理学:单机构回顾性五年研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 27;18(12):e0295210. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295210. eCollection 2023.
血培养阳性时间是金黄色葡萄球菌菌血症患儿临床结局的危险因素:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 May 17;19(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3993-4.
4
Variations in infection sites and mortality rates among patients in intensive care units with severe sepsis and septic shock in Japan.日本重症监护病房中严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的感染部位及死亡率差异。
J Intensive Care. 2019 May 3;7:28. doi: 10.1186/s40560-019-0383-3. eCollection 2019.
5
Effect of a Resuscitation Strategy Targeting Peripheral Perfusion Status vs Serum Lactate Levels on 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Septic Shock: The ANDROMEDA-SHOCK Randomized Clinical Trial.以外周灌注状态为目标的复苏策略与血清乳酸水平对感染性休克患者 28 天死亡率的影响:ANDROMEDA-SHOCK 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 19;321(7):654-664. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0071.
6
Challenges in the management of septic shock: a narrative review.脓毒性休克管理面临的挑战:叙事性综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Apr;45(4):420-433. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05544-x. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Risk Factors for Same Pathogen Sepsis Readmission Following Hospitalization for Septic Shock.感染性休克住院治疗后同一病原体败血症再入院的危险因素。
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 3;8(2):181. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020181.
8
Time to positivity of blood cultures supports early re-evaluation of empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy.血培养阳性时间支持早期重新评估经验性广谱抗菌治疗。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0208819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208819. eCollection 2019.
9
Epidemiology and Immune Pathogenesis of Viral Sepsis.病毒败血症的流行病学和免疫发病机制。
Front Immunol. 2018 Sep 27;9:2147. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02147. eCollection 2018.
10
Current time-to-positivity of blood cultures in febrile neutropenia: a tool to be used in stewardship de-escalation strategies.发热性中性粒细胞减少症中血培养的阳性时间:在管理降级策略中使用的工具。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Apr;25(4):447-453. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.07.026. Epub 2018 Aug 7.