Suppr超能文献

血培养阳性时间支持早期重新评估经验性广谱抗菌治疗。

Time to positivity of blood cultures supports early re-evaluation of empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy.

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Department of Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Jan 2;14(1):e0208819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208819. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood cultures are considered the gold standard to distinguish bacteremia from non-bacteremic systemic inflammation. In current clinical practice, bacteraemia is considered unlikely if blood cultures have been negative for 48-72 hours. Modern BC systems have reduced this time-to-positivity (TTP), questioning whether the time frame of 48-72 hrs is still valid. This study investigates the distribution of TTP, the probability of blood culture positivity after 24 hours, and identifies clinical predictors of prolonged TTP.

METHODS

Adult patients with monomicrobial bacteremia in an academic hospital were included retrospectively over a three-year period. Clinical data were retrieved from the medical records. Predictors of TTP >24 hours were determined by uni- and multivariate analyses. The residual probability of bacteremia was estimated for the scenario of negative BCs at 24 hours after bedside collection.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 801 patients, accounting for 897 episodes of bacteremia. Mean age was 65 years (IQR 54-73), 534 (59.5%) patients were male. Median TTP was 15.7 (IQR 13.5-19.3) hours. TTP was ≤24 hours in 85.3% of episodes. Antibiotic pre-treatment (adjusted OR 1.77; 95%CI 1.14-2.74, p<0.01) was independently associated with prolonged TTP. The probability of bacteremia, if BC had remained negative for 24 hours, was 1.8% (95% CI 1.46-2.14).

CONCLUSION

With adequate hospital logistics, the probability of positive blood cultures after 24 hours of negative cultures was low. Combined with clinical reassessment, knowledge of this low probability may contribute to prioritization of the differential diagnosis and decisions on antimicrobial therapy. As a potential antibiotic stewardship tool, this strategy warrants further prospective investigation.

摘要

背景

血液培养被认为是区分菌血症与非菌血症全身炎症的金标准。在当前的临床实践中,如果血液培养在 48-72 小时内为阴性,则认为菌血症不太可能。现代血培养系统缩短了阳性时间(TTP),这使得 48-72 小时的时间框架是否仍然有效受到质疑。本研究旨在调查 TTP 的分布、24 小时后血培养阳性的概率,并确定 TTP 延长的临床预测因素。

方法

回顾性纳入了在一家学术医院中患有单一致病菌血症的成年患者,研究时间为三年。从病历中提取临床数据。通过单变量和多变量分析确定 TTP >24 小时的预测因素。对于床边采集后 24 小时血培养阴性的情况,估计了菌血症的剩余概率。

结果

该队列包括 801 例患者,共 897 例菌血症发作。患者平均年龄为 65 岁(IQR 54-73),534 例(59.5%)为男性。中位 TTP 为 15.7(IQR 13.5-19.3)小时。85.3%的菌血症发作 TTP 小于或等于 24 小时。抗生素预治疗(调整后的 OR 1.77;95%CI 1.14-2.74,p<0.01)与 TTP 延长独立相关。如果 24 小时的血培养仍为阴性,那么菌血症的概率为 1.8%(95%CI 1.46-2.14)。

结论

在适当的医院后勤条件下,在连续 24 小时阴性培养后,阳性血培养的概率较低。结合临床再评估,了解这种低概率可能有助于对鉴别诊断进行优先级排序,并对抗菌治疗做出决策。作为一种潜在的抗生素管理工具,这种策略值得进一步进行前瞻性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9ad/6314566/334240484e59/pone.0208819.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验