Suppr超能文献

靶向嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘中的白细胞介素-5通路:美泊利单抗与贝那利珠单抗在外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数降低方面的比较。

Targeting the IL-5 pathway in eosinophilic asthma: a comparison of mepolizumab to benralizumab in the reduction of peripheral eosinophil counts.

作者信息

Ghassemian Arian, Park Jane Jiyoon, Tsoulis Michael W, Kim Harold

机构信息

Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2021 Jan 6;17(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00507-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mepolizumab and benralizumab are biologics approved for severe eosinophilic asthma. Mepolizumab is an anti-interlukin-5 (IL-5) antibody while benralizumab is an anti-interleukin-5 receptor alpha (IL-5Rα) antibody targeting the IL-5 receptor on eosinophils. Both therapies reduce oral corticosteroid requirements and asthma exacerbations. However, no head-to-head studies have been published. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of peripheral eosinophil reduction of mepolizumab and benralizumab.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with severe eosinophilic asthma who were approved for either IL-5 agent. Patients with noted non-adherence or those who were on fluctuating doses of corticosteroids for non-asthma related illnesses were excluded. The last detectable eosinophil count for each patient prior to start of therapy was compared to the highest eosinophil count noted after therapy start with at least 30 days of adherence.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients taking mepolizumab and 19 patients taking benralizumab met the inclusion criteria and had both pre-treatment and post-treatment eosinophil counts. Baseline characteristics were not statistically different between those on mepolizumab and benralizumab therapy. The mean pre-therapy serum eosinophil count did not statistically differ between patients on mepolizumab (597.2 cells/µL) compared to benralizumab (521.6 cells/µL), p = 0.3769. While both therapies resulted in a significant decrease in eosinophil count (p < 0.0001); the mean decrease did not statistically differ between patients taking mepolizumab compared to those on benralizumab, p = 0.9079. Nonetheless, 100% of patients receiving benralizumab had undetectable eosinophil counts post-therapy compared to 31% of patients receiving mepolizumab (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Both mepolizumab and benralizumab are potent targets of the IL-5 pathway with the ability to significantly reduce peripheral eosinophil counts. While there is there is no statistical difference in the magnitude of eosinophil reduction offered by each agent, benralizumab is able to decrease peripheral eosinophil counts to 0 cells/µL in more patients than mepolizumab.

摘要

背景

美泊利珠单抗和贝那利珠单抗是被批准用于治疗重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的生物制剂。美泊利珠单抗是一种抗白细胞介素-5(IL-5)抗体,而贝那利珠单抗是一种抗白细胞介素-5受体α(IL-5Rα)抗体,作用于嗜酸性粒细胞上的IL-5受体。两种疗法均能降低口服糖皮质激素的用量并减少哮喘发作。然而,尚无直接比较两种药物疗效的研究发表。本研究旨在比较美泊利珠单抗和贝那利珠单抗降低外周血嗜酸性粒细胞的疗效。

方法

对批准使用任一IL-5制剂的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘患者进行回顾性病历审查。排除有明显用药依从性不佳或因非哮喘相关疾病而使用剂量波动的糖皮质激素的患者。将每位患者治疗开始前最后一次可检测到的嗜酸性粒细胞计数与治疗开始后至少30天依从治疗时记录到的最高嗜酸性粒细胞计数进行比较。

结果

36例服用美泊利珠单抗的患者和19例服用贝那利珠单抗的患者符合纳入标准,且均有治疗前和治疗后的嗜酸性粒细胞计数。接受美泊利珠单抗治疗和接受贝那利珠单抗治疗的患者的基线特征无统计学差异。美泊利珠单抗组患者治疗前血清嗜酸性粒细胞平均计数(597.2个细胞/µL)与贝那利珠单抗组(521.6个细胞/µL)相比,差异无统计学意义,p = 0.3769。两种疗法均使嗜酸性粒细胞计数显著下降(p < 0.0001);美泊利珠单抗组患者与贝那利珠单抗组患者相比,嗜酸性粒细胞计数的平均下降幅度差异无统计学意义,p = 0.9079。尽管如此,接受贝那利珠单抗治疗的患者中有100%在治疗后嗜酸性粒细胞计数检测不到,而接受美泊利珠单抗治疗的患者中这一比例为31%(p < 0.0001)。

结论

美泊利珠单抗和贝那利珠单抗都是IL-5通路的有效作用靶点,均能显著降低外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数。虽然两种药物降低嗜酸性粒细胞的幅度无统计学差异,但与美泊利珠单抗相比,贝那利珠单抗能使更多患者的外周血嗜酸性粒细胞计数降至0个细胞/µL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2da/7789431/cfcf75a7c7c0/13223_2020_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验