Petzold Axel, Biousse Valerie, Bursztyn Lulu, Costello Fiona, Crum Alison, Digre Kathleen, Fraser Clare, Fraser J Alex, Katz Bradley, Jurkute Neringa, Newman Nancy, Lautrup-Battistini Jette, Lawlor Mitchell, Liskova Petra, Lorenz Birgit, Malmqvist Lasse, Peragallo Jason, Sibony Patrick, Subramanian Prem, Rejdak Robert, Nowomiejska Katarzyna, Touitou Valerie, Warner Judith, Wegener Marianne, Wong Sui, Yu-Wai-Man Patrick, Hamann Steffen
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Neurology and Ophthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Locatie VUMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Neuroophthalmology. 2020 Jul 16;44(6):413-414. doi: 10.1080/01658107.2020.1760891. eCollection 2020.
Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS) are a new retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) finding. The had made recommendations to distinguish PHOMS from true optic disc drusen (ODD) in 2018. While publications on PHOMS have increased since then, the accuracy of the definition of PHOMS and reliability of detection is unknown. In this multi-rater study, we demonstrate that the 2018 definition of PHOMS resulted in a poor multi-rater kappa of 0.356. We performed a Delphi consensus process to develop a consistent and refined definition of PHOMS with clear principles around the nature of PHOMS and how they differ from normal anatomy. Fifty explanatory teaching slides, provided as supplementary material, allowed our expert group of raters to achieve a good level of agreement (kappa 0.701, 50 OCT scans, 21 raters). We recommend adopting the refined definition for PHOMS.
视乳头周围高反射卵形团块状结构(PHOMS)是视网膜光学相干断层扫描(OCT)的一项新发现。2018年曾有人提出区分PHOMS与真性视盘小疣(ODD)的建议。自那时起,关于PHOMS的出版物有所增加,但PHOMS定义的准确性和检测的可靠性尚不清楚。在这项多评估者研究中,我们证明2018年PHOMS的定义导致多评估者kappa值较差,为0.356。我们进行了德尔菲共识过程,以制定一个一致且完善的PHOMS定义,围绕PHOMS的性质以及它们与正常解剖结构的差异确立明确原则。作为补充材料提供的50张解释性教学幻灯片,使我们的评估者专家组达成了较高程度的一致(kappa值为0.701,50次OCT扫描,21名评估者)。我们建议采用经过完善的PHOMS定义。