Walters L
Center for Bioethics, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Washington, DC 20057.
Science. 1988 Feb 5;239(4840):597-603. doi: 10.1126/science.3340846.
The epidemic of infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) poses a major ethical question: How can we control the epidemic and the harm that it causes without unjustly discriminating against particular social groups and without unnecessarily infringing on the freedom of individuals? This question pertains to three spheres of public policy in the United States: public health, the delivery of health care, and research. In the public health sphere, vigorous educational efforts will be required, as will modified approaches to intravenous drug use, prostitution, and homosexual and bisexual sexual activity. Carefully targeted, voluntary testing and screening programs should be coupled with counseling and with guarantees of confidentiality and nondiscrimination where these are appropriate. Both health care workers and the health care system have a moral obligation to provide care to people with HIV infection, but heroic self-sacrifice should not be required provided that infection control precautions are observed. Patients with neurological involvement and terminally ill patients will benefit from statutes allowing recognition of advance directives about preferred modes of care or nontreatment. There is a moral imperative to perform intensive research directed toward the understanding, treatment, and prevention of HIV infection and AIDS. The research process will raise challenging ethical questions.
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染及获得性免疫缺陷综合征(AIDS)的流行引发了一个重大的伦理问题:我们如何在不歧视特定社会群体且不过度侵犯个人自由的情况下控制这一流行病及其造成的危害?这个问题涉及美国公共政策的三个领域:公共卫生、医疗保健服务以及研究。在公共卫生领域,需要大力开展教育工作,同时改变对静脉吸毒、卖淫以及同性恋和双性恋性行为的处理方式。精心设计、针对特定人群的自愿检测和筛查项目应与咨询服务相结合,并在适当情况下保证保密和不歧视。医护人员以及医疗保健系统都有道德义务为HIV感染者提供护理,但只要遵守感染控制预防措施,就不应要求做出英勇的自我牺牲。患有神经系统疾病的患者和绝症患者将受益于允许认可关于首选护理或不治疗方式的预先指示的法规。开展旨在了解、治疗和预防HIV感染及AIDS的深入研究具有道德必要性。研究过程将引发具有挑战性的伦理问题。