• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥施纳浸信会医院良性指征子宫切除术手术路径选择的回顾性分析

Retrospective Analysis of Route Selection for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications at Ochsner Baptist Hospital.

作者信息

Blosser Emily G, Morris George B, Gala Rajiv B

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.

The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.

出版信息

Ochsner J. 2020 Winter;20(4):368-372. doi: 10.31486/toj.20.0017.

DOI:10.31486/toj.20.0017
PMID:33408573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7755548/
Abstract

Hysterectomy, the most common gynecologic procedure in the United States, can be performed in a number of ways. A shift in surgical practice toward cost-effective and minimally invasive approaches provides an impetus to maximize early training in vaginal surgery for resident physicians. A total of 62 abdominal, 303 robotic, and 41 vaginal hysterectomies performed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017 at Ochsner Baptist Hospital in New Orleans, LA, that met inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed with a previously published route selection algorithm. We applied the algorithm using preoperative and postoperative data collected via medical record review to determine if our practices favor minimally invasive approaches. Analysis using preoperative variables identified 152 robotic cases that were vaginal hysterectomy candidates (50.2%). Postoperative analysis of the same cases identified 127 (41.9%) vaginal hysterectomy candidates. Among abdominal cases, 37 (59.7%) called for a less invasive approach by preoperative findings: 7 (11.3%) vaginal and 30 (48.4%) laparoscopic. The algorithm sorted only 25 of the 62 abdominal cases (40.3%) to the abdominal approach. Use of a hysterectomy route selection algorithm preoperatively improves identification of candidates for minimally invasive hysterectomy.

摘要

子宫切除术是美国最常见的妇科手术,有多种实施方式。手术实践向具有成本效益和微创方法的转变,为住院医师最大化早期阴道手术培训提供了动力。对2015年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间在路易斯安那州新奥尔良市奥施纳浸信会医院进行的62例腹部子宫切除术、303例机器人辅助子宫切除术和41例阴道子宫切除术进行回顾性研究,这些手术均符合纳入标准,并采用先前发表的手术路径选择算法进行分析。我们通过病历审查收集术前和术后数据,应用该算法来确定我们的手术操作是否倾向于微创方法。使用术前变量进行分析,确定了152例机器人辅助子宫切除术病例为阴道子宫切除术候选病例(50.2%)。对相同病例进行术后分析,确定了127例(41.9%)阴道子宫切除术候选病例。在腹部手术病例中,术前检查结果显示37例(59.7%)需要采用侵入性较小的方法:7例(11.3%)为阴道手术,30例(48.4%)为腹腔镜手术。该算法仅将62例腹部手术病例中的25例(40.3%)归类为腹部手术路径。术前使用子宫切除术路径选择算法可改善微创子宫切除术候选病例的识别。

相似文献

1
Retrospective Analysis of Route Selection for Hysterectomy for Benign Indications at Ochsner Baptist Hospital.奥施纳浸信会医院良性指征子宫切除术手术路径选择的回顾性分析
Ochsner J. 2020 Winter;20(4):368-372. doi: 10.31486/toj.20.0017.
2
Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.机器人辅助与其他微创途径子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):650.e1-650.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.027. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
3
Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.机器人手术对子宫切除术趋势的影响:对住院医师教育的启示。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Oct 27.
4
Progressive reduction in abdominal hysterectomy rates: impact of laparoscopy, robotics and surgeon factors.腹式子宫切除率的逐步降低:腹腔镜手术、机器人手术及外科医生因素的影响
J Robot Surg. 2014 Mar;8(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-013-0412-5. Epub 2013 Jun 11.
5
Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.多中心分析:比较由高手术量外科医生进行的机器人辅助、开放、腹腔镜及经阴道子宫切除术治疗良性疾病的效果
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jun;133(3):359-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.11.010. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
6
Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.肠道准备的使用并不能降低微创或开放性子宫切除术术后感染发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):231.e1-231.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
7
Prospective Implementation and Evaluation of a Decision-Tree Algorithm for Route of Hysterectomy.前瞻性实施和评估用于子宫切除术途径的决策树算法。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):761-769. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003725.
8
Comparative analysis of vaginal versus robotic-assisted hysterectomy for benign indications.良性指征下阴道子宫切除术与机器人辅助子宫切除术的对比分析
J Robot Surg. 2013 Mar;7(1):39-46. doi: 10.1007/s11701-012-0339-2. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
10
Impact of robotic technology on hysterectomy route and associated implications for resident education.机器人技术对子宫切除术途径的影响及其对住院医师教育的相关影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;212(2):196.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.037. Epub 2014 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.机器人手术的成本:利用国家住院患者样本分析机器人辅助手术与腹腔镜手术的附加成本。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2217-2221. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6507-3. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
2
Trends in Route of Hysterectomy after the Implementation of a Comprehensive Robotic Training Program.实施全面机器人培训计划后子宫切除术途径的趋势
Minim Invasive Surg. 2018 Sep 17;2018:7362489. doi: 10.1155/2018/7362489. eCollection 2018.
3
Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.获得微创子宫切除术的社会决定因素:重新评估种族与良性疾病子宫切除途径之间的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):572.e1-572.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.036. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
4
Committee Opinion No 701: Choosing the Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease.委员会意见 701:选择良性疾病的子宫切除术途径。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):e155-e159. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002112.
5
Geographic Variance of Cost Associated With Hysterectomy.子宫切除术相关费用的地域差异。
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):844-853. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001966.
6
Determining Optimal Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: Clinical Decision Tree Algorithm.确定良性指征子宫切除术的最佳路径:临床决策树算法
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jan;129(1):130-138. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001756.
7
Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.妇科机器人手术
Front Surg. 2016 May 2;3:26. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00026. eCollection 2016.
8
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
9
Robotic surgery in gynecology.妇科机器人手术
J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690.
10
Considerations to improve the evidence-based use of vaginal hysterectomy in benign gynecology.考虑改进基于证据的阴道子宫切除术在良性妇科中的应用。
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Sep;124(3):585-588. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000398.