Queiroz Polyane Mazucatto, Santaella Gustavo Machado, de Castro Lopes Sergio Lucio Pereira, Haiter-Neto Francisco, Freitas Deborah Queiroz
Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, São José dos Campos Dental School, São Paulo State University, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2020 Dec;50(4):339-346. doi: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.339. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic efficacy, and radiation dose associated with the use of a cadmium telluride (CdTe) detector, compared to charge-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detectors.
Lateral cephalographs of a phantom (type 1) composed of synthetic polymer filled with water and another phantom (type 2) composed of human skull macerated with polymer coating were obtained with CdTe, CCD, and CMOS detectors. Dosimeters placed on the type 2 phantom were used to measure radiation. Noise levels from each image were also measured. McNamara cephalometric analysis was conducted, the dentoskeletal configurations were assessed, and a subjective evaluation of image quality was conducted. Parametric data were compared via 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey test, with a significance level of 5%. Subjective image quality and dentoskeletal configuration were described qualitatively.
A statistically significant difference was found among the images obtained with the 3 detectors (<0.05), with the lowest noise level observed among the images obtained with the CdTe detector and a higher subjective preference demonstrated for those images. For the cephalometric analyses, no significant difference (>0.05) was observed, and perfect agreement was seen with regard to the classifications obtained from the images acquired using the 3 detectors. The radiation dose associated with the CMOS detector was higher than the doses associated with the CCD (<0.05) and CdTe detectors (<0.05).
Considering the evaluated parameters, the CdTe detector is recommended for use in clinical practice.
本研究的目的是评估碲化镉(CdTe)探测器与电荷耦合器件(CCD)和互补金属氧化物半导体(CMOS)探测器相比的图像质量、诊断效能和辐射剂量。
使用CdTe、CCD和CMOS探测器获取由填充水的合成聚合物组成的体模(1型)和由涂有聚合物涂层的人类颅骨浸软物组成的另一个体模(2型)的侧位头颅X线片。放置在2型体模上的剂量计用于测量辐射。还测量了每张图像的噪声水平。进行了麦克纳马拉头影测量分析,评估了牙颌面结构,并对图像质量进行了主观评价。参数数据通过单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行比较,显著性水平为5%。对主观图像质量和牙颌面结构进行了定性描述。
在使用三种探测器获得的图像之间发现了统计学上的显著差异(<0.05),在使用CdTe探测器获得的图像中观察到最低的噪声水平,并且对这些图像表现出更高的主观偏好。对于头影测量分析,未观察到显著差异(>0.05),并且在使用三种探测器获取的图像所得到的分类方面达成了完全一致。与CMOS探测器相关的辐射剂量高于与CCD(<0.05)和CdTe探测器(<0.05)相关的剂量。
考虑到所评估的参数,建议在临床实践中使用CdTe探测器。