• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率:一项前瞻性试点研究。

Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1002/ejhf.1353
PMID:30548129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Surprise Question: 'would you be surprised if this patient were to die within the next year?' has been shown to predict mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and cancer. This prospective study aimed to determine whether the Surprise Question could identify heart failure patients with a prognosis of less than 1 year, and whether the Surprise Question can be used by different healthcare professionals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Overall, 129 consecutive patients admitted with decompensated heart failure were included. Doctors and nurses were asked to provide a 'surprised' or 'not surprised' response to the Surprise Question for each patient. Patients were followed up until death or 1 year following study inclusion. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the Surprise Question were assessed. Cox regression was used to determine covariates significantly associated with survival. The Surprise Question showed excellent sensitivity (0.85) and negative predictive value (0.88) but only fair specificity (0.59) and positive predictive value (0.52) when asked of cardiologists. There were similar levels of accuracy between doctors and specialist nurses. The Surprise Question was significantly associated with all-cause mortality in multivariate regression analysis (hazard ratio 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-7.9, P = 0.046).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the Surprise Question can identify heart failure patients within the last year of life. Despite over-classification of patients into the 'not surprised' category, the Surprise Question identified nearly all patients who were within the last year of life, whilst also accurately identifying those unlikely to die.

摘要

背景

“如果这位患者在接下来的一年中去世,你会感到惊讶吗?”这个问题(即“Surprise Question”)已被证明可以预测患有慢性肾病和癌症的患者的死亡率。本前瞻性研究旨在确定“Surprise Question”是否可以识别出预期寿命不到 1 年的心力衰竭患者,以及该问题是否可以由不同的医疗保健专业人员使用。

方法和结果

共纳入 129 例因失代偿性心力衰竭入院的连续患者。医生和护士被要求对每位患者的“Surprise Question”回答“惊讶”或“不惊讶”。对患者进行随访,直至死亡或研究纳入后 1 年。评估了“Surprise Question”的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。Cox 回归用于确定与生存显著相关的协变量。当询问心脏病专家时,“Surprise Question”表现出出色的敏感性(0.85)和阴性预测值(0.88),但特异性(0.59)和阳性预测值(0.52)仅为中等水平。医生和专科护士的准确性水平相似。多变量回归分析显示,“Surprise Question”与全因死亡率显著相关(危险比 2.8,95%置信区间 1.0-7.9,P=0.046)。

结论

本研究表明,“Surprise Question”可以识别生命最后一年的心力衰竭患者。尽管患者被过度分类为“不惊讶”类别,但“Surprise Question”几乎可以识别出所有生命最后一年的患者,同时也准确识别出那些不太可能死亡的患者。

相似文献

1
Predicting one-year mortality in heart failure using the 'Surprise Question': a prospective pilot study.使用“Surprise Question”预测心力衰竭患者一年死亡率:一项前瞻性试点研究。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Feb;21(2):227-234. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1353. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
2
Palliative Care Needs Assessment Using the Surprise Question in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure.使用“意外问题”对住院心力衰竭患者进行姑息治疗需求评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):e037769. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037769. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
3
The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.“惊讶问题”可用于识别急诊科中需要姑息治疗的心力衰竭患者。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 May;57(5):944-951. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.惊喜问题作为触发因素,用于对患有晚期心脏病的儿童进行初级姑息治疗干预。
Pediatr Cardiol. 2022 Dec;43(8):1822-1831. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-02919-8. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
The Value of the Surprise Question to Predict One-Year Mortality in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Prospective Cohort Study.《疑问问题对特发性肺纤维化一年死亡率预测的价值:一项前瞻性队列研究》
Respiration. 2021;100(8):780-785. doi: 10.1159/000516291. Epub 2021 May 27.
6
The prognostic value of the 12-, 6-, 3- and 1-month 'Surprise Question' in cancer patients: A prospective cohort study in three hospitals.12 个月、6 个月、3 个月和 1 个月“意外问题”对癌症患者预后的预测价值:三所医院的前瞻性队列研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Nov;31(6):e13551. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13551. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
7
Observational study of agreement between attending and trainee physicians on the surprise question: "Would you be surprised if this patient died in the next 12 months?".观察性研究:在“如果这个患者在接下来的 12 个月内去世,你会感到惊讶吗?”这个问题上,主治医生和住院医师之间的一致性。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0247571. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247571. eCollection 2021.
8
Usability of the surprise question by nurses to identify 12-month mortality in hospitalized older patients: A prospective cohort study.护士使用惊讶问题识别住院老年患者 12 个月死亡率的可用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103609. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103609. Epub 2020 May 29.
9
Analysis of the surprise question as a tool for predicting death in neonates.将突发问题作为预测新生儿死亡工具的分析
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Feb 7;184(2):182. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05879-8.
10
"3-Day Surprise Question" to predict prognosis of advanced cancer patients with impending death: Multicenter prospective observational study.“3 日惊讶问题”预测即将死亡的晚期癌症患者的预后:多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Cancer Med. 2021 Feb;10(3):1018-1026. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3689. Epub 2020 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Palliative Care Needs Assessment Using the Surprise Question in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure.使用“意外问题”对住院心力衰竭患者进行姑息治疗需求评估。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):e037769. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.037769. Epub 2025 Mar 30.
2
Inpatient initiation of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: the prescribing learning curve.住院患者起始使用钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂:处方开具的学习曲线
Br J Cardiol. 2024 Jan 16;31(1):003. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.003. eCollection 2024.
3
The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.
意外问题与临床医生预测的预后:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 25;15(1):12-35. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879.
4
Machine learning approach for predicting cardiovascular disease in Bangladesh: evidence from a cross-sectional study in 2023.机器学习方法预测孟加拉国的心血管疾病:2023 年横断面研究的证据。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Apr 18;24(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03883-2.
5
Heart failure 'the cancer of the heart': the prognostic role of the HLM score.心力衰竭是“心脏的癌症”:HLM 评分的预后作用。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Feb;11(1):390-399. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14594. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
6
Improvement of a prediction model for heart failure survival through explainable artificial intelligence.通过可解释人工智能改进心力衰竭生存预测模型。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Aug 1;10:1219586. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1219586. eCollection 2023.
7
External Validation and User Experiences of the ProPal-COPD Tool to Identify the Palliative Phase in COPD.ProPal-COPD 工具在 COPD 患者进入终末期阶段识别中的外部验证和用户体验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022 Dec 22;17:3129-3138. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S387716. eCollection 2022.
8
'Acute Heart Failure': Should We Abandon the Term Altogether?《急性心力衰竭》:我们是否应该彻底放弃这个术语?
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2022 Dec;19(6):425-434. doi: 10.1007/s11897-022-00576-9. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
Evaluation of Spending Differences Between Beneficiaries in Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Shared Savings Program.评估医疗保险优势计划和医疗保险储蓄计划中受益人的支出差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2228529. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.28529.
10
The utility of the surprise question: A useful tool for identifying patients nearing the last phase of life? A systematic review and meta-analysis.“惊讶问题”的实用性:识别生命末期患者的有用工具?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Palliat Med. 2022 Jul;36(7):1023-1046. doi: 10.1177/02692163221099116.