Suppr超能文献

动机性访谈减少高危男性青年的危险性行为:一项随机对照初步研究。

Motivational interviewing to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth: A randomized controlled pilot study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Social Sciences Research Center, University of Rhode Island.

Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Rhode Island.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2022 Feb;19(1):167-175. doi: 10.1037/ser0000498. Epub 2021 Jan 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite male youth taking more sexual risks that lead to unwanted partner pregnancy and/or sexually transmitted infections (STIs), research evaluating interventions for risky sex has focused almost exclusively on adolescent and adult females. With STIs among male youth on the rise, behavioral interventions that target risky sex among male youth are needed.

PURPOSE

A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted to examine the feasibility and acceptability of two manualized behavioral interventions for sexually active male youth.

METHODS

Sexually active at-risk male youth (N = 27) were recruited and randomized to receive one session of motivational interviewing (MI) or didactic educational counseling (DEC). Assessment interviews were conducted prior to and 3 months following the intervention session.

RESULTS

Support for the feasibility and acceptability of delivering behavioral interventions to reduce risky sexual behaviors among at-risk male youth was found. Compared to participants in DEC at follow-up, participants in MI reported having significantly fewer sexual encounters with casual partners, used substances at the time of sex significantly less often with all partners and casual partners, and reported fewer incidents of using substances at the time of sex without a condom with all partners. Conversely, participants who received MI used substances at the time of sex with main partners and used substances at the time of sex without a condom more often with main partners at follow-up compared to participants who received DEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the pilot study support conducting a larger randomized controlled trial to examine treatment effects. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

背景

尽管男性青年承担着更多导致意外伴侣怀孕和/或性传播感染(STIs)的风险行为,但评估风险性行为干预措施的研究几乎完全集中在青少年和成年女性身上。由于男青年中的性传播感染呈上升趋势,因此需要针对男青年的风险性行为进行行为干预。

目的

本研究开展了一项随机对照试点研究,以检验两种针对活跃男青年的性行为的手册化行为干预措施的可行性和可接受性。

方法

招募并随机分配有性行为的高风险男青年(N=27),接受一次动机性访谈(MI)或说教式教育咨询(DEC)。在干预前和干预后 3 个月进行评估访谈。

结果

为向高危男青年提供减少风险性行为的行为干预措施提供了可行性和可接受性的支持。与 DEC 组的参与者相比,MI 组的参与者在随访时报告与偶然伴侣的性接触显著减少,与所有伴侣和偶然伴侣发生性行为时使用物质的频率显著降低,与所有伴侣发生性行为时未使用安全套使用物质的情况也显著减少。相反,与 DEC 组相比,接受 MI 的参与者在随访时与主要伴侣发生性行为时使用物质的频率更高,与主要伴侣发生性行为时未使用安全套的频率也更高。

结论

试点研究的结果支持开展更大规模的随机对照试验,以检验治疗效果。

相似文献

3
A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Computer-Delivered Brief Intervention for Substance Use and Risky Sex During Pregnancy.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Jan;27(1):83-92. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6408. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
5
Beliefs about condoms and their association with intentions to use condoms among youths in detention.
J Adolesc Health. 1994 May;15(3):228-37. doi: 10.1016/1054-139x(94)90508-8.
7
Correlates of condom use and number of sexual partners among high school adolescents.
J Sch Health. 1993 Feb;63(2):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1993.tb06087.x.
8
Mechanisms of Action for Empirically Supported Interventions to Reduce Adolescent Sexual Risk Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jul;67(1):53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
Heterosexual experiences and partnerships of urban, low-income African-American and Hispanic youth.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1996 Mar 1;11(3):288-300. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199603010-00009.
10
Partner condom use among adolescent girls with sexually transmitted diseases.
J Adolesc Health. 1999 May;24(5):357-61. doi: 10.1016/s1054-139x(98)00133-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The Influence of Race and Ethnicity on Becoming a Human Subject: Factors Associated with Participation in Research.
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2017 Sep;7:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 24.
2
3
Theory-based interventions for contraception.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 23;11(11):CD007249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007249.pub5.
4
Single-Session Behavioral Interventions for Sexual Risk Reduction: A Meta-Analysis.
Ann Behav Med. 2016 Dec;50(6):920-934. doi: 10.1007/s12160-016-9818-4.
5
Information bias in health research: definition, pitfalls, and adjustment methods.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 May 4;9:211-7. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S104807. eCollection 2016.
7
Number of Sexual Partners and Relationship Status Are Associated With Unprotected Sex Across Emerging Adulthood.
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Feb;46(2):419-432. doi: 10.1007/s10508-016-0692-8. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Meta-analysis of motivational interviewing for adolescent health behavior: efficacy beyond substance use.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):1212-8. doi: 10.1037/a0036912. Epub 2014 May 19.
9
The statistical interpretation of pilot trials: should significance thresholds be reconsidered?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 20;14:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-41.
10
Programs to reduce teen pregnancy, sexually transmitted infections, and associated sexual risk behaviors: a systematic review.
J Adolesc Health. 2014 May;54(5):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验