From the Division of Vascular Surgery, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Montréal, Montreal, Que.
Can J Surg. 2021 Jan 7;64(1):E3-E8. doi: 10.1503/cjs.012518.
There is a growing trend to implement intermediate care units to avoid unnecessary costs associated with intensive care unit (ICU) admission and associated resources. We sought to evaluate the safety of transitioning from a routine to a selective policy of postoperative transfer to the ICU for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
This retrospective study included consecutive open elective AAA repair procedures performed at a single centre from Aug. 8, 2010, to Dec. 1, 2014. Patients were identified through a prospectively maintained database, and electronic charts were reviewed. Patients with interventions before Mar. 13, 2012, were routinely sent to the ICU after operation (group A). Patients treated after this date were sent directly to an intermediate care unit (group B) unless preoperative or intraoperative factors deemed them suitable for ICU admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death; secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and length of stay. We used logistic and linear regression to determine the association between the use of an intermediate care unit and the primary and secondary outcomes after adjusting for confounders and clinically relevant covariates.
The cohort comprised 310 patients (266 men, 44 women) with a mean age of 69.7 (standard deviation 10.1) years and a mean AAA diameter of 61.2 mm (SD 9.6 mm). Groups A and B included 118 and 192 patients, respectively. Admission to the ICU was spared in 149 patients (77.6%) in group B. Only 2 patients (1.3%) in group B were subsequently admitted to the ICU. There was no statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality or perioperative complications between the 2 groups on multivariable logistic regression. There was a nonsignificant trend toward slightly shorter length of stay in group B.
In this single-centre experience with the majority of patients sent directly to an intermediate care unit, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality or morbidity between routine and selective ICU admission. Our results confirm the safety of a selective ICU admission pathway.
为避免与 ICU 入院和相关资源相关的不必要费用,越来越多的医院开始实施中级护理病房。我们旨在评估对择期开放性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后从常规转移到选择性 ICU 转移的安全性。
本回顾性研究包括 2010 年 8 月 8 日至 2014 年 12 月 1 日在单一中心进行的连续择期开放性 AAA 修复手术。通过一个前瞻性维护的数据库识别患者,并对电子病历进行了回顾。2012 年 3 月 13 日之前接受治疗的患者术后常规转至 ICU(A 组)。此后接受治疗的患者直接转至中级护理病房(B 组),除非术前或术中存在因素认为他们适合 ICU 入院。主要结局是院内死亡;次要结局是围手术期并发症和住院时间。我们使用逻辑和线性回归来确定在调整混杂因素和临床相关协变量后,使用中级护理病房与主要和次要结局之间的关联。
该队列包括 310 名患者(266 名男性,44 名女性),平均年龄为 69.7(标准差 10.1)岁,AAA 直径为 61.2mm(标准差 9.6mm)。A 组和 B 组分别包括 118 名和 192 名患者。B 组中有 149 名患者(77.6%)避免入住 ICU。B 组中仅有 2 名患者(1.3%)随后被收治到 ICU。两组在多变量逻辑回归中,院内死亡率或围手术期并发症无统计学差异。B 组的住院时间略有缩短,但无统计学意义。
在这项单中心研究中,大多数患者直接送入中级护理病房,常规和选择性 ICU 入院在死亡率或发病率方面没有统计学差异。我们的结果证实了选择性 ICU 入院途径的安全性。