Suppr超能文献

经颅交流电刺激 (tACS) 时评估脑电振荡的刺激伪迹源分离 (SASS)。

Stimulation artifact source separation (SASS) for assessing electric brain oscillations during transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).

机构信息

Clinical Neurotechnology Lab, Neuroscience Research Center (NWFZ), Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), MEG Core Facility, Bethesda, USA.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2021 Mar;228:117571. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117571. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract

Brain oscillations, e.g. measured by electro- or magnetoencephalography (EEG/MEG), are causally linked to brain functions that are fundamental for perception, cognition and learning. Recent advances in neurotechnology provide means to non-invasively target these oscillations using frequency-tuned amplitude-modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS). However, online adaptation of stimulation parameters to ongoing brain oscillations remains an unsolved problem due to stimulation artifacts that impede such adaptation, particularly at the target frequency. Here, we introduce a real-time compatible artifact rejection algorithm (Stimulation Artifact Source Separation, SASS) that overcomes this limitation. SASS is a spatial filter (linear projection) removing EEG signal components that are maximally different in the presence versus absence of stimulation. This enables the reliable removal of stimulation-specific signal components, while leaving physiological signal components unaffected. For validation of SASS, we evoked brain activity with known phase and amplitude using 10 Hz visual flickers across 7 healthy human volunteers. 64-channel EEG was recorded during and in absence of 10 Hz AM-tACS targeting the visual cortex. Phase differences between AM-tACS and the visual stimuli were randomized, so that steady-state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were phase-locked to the visual stimuli but not to the AM-tACS signal. For validation, distributions of single-trial amplitude and phase of EEG signals recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were compared for each participant. When no artifact rejection method was applied, AM-tACS stimulation artifacts impeded assessment of single-trial SSVEP amplitude and phase. Using SASS, amplitude and phase of single trials recorded during and in absence of AM-tACS were comparable. These results indicate that SASS can be used to establish adaptive (closed-loop) AM-tACS, a potentially powerful tool to target various brain functions, and to investigate how AM-tACS interacts with electric brain oscillations.

摘要

脑振荡,例如通过脑电图(EEG)或脑磁图(MEG)测量,与大脑功能有因果关系,这些功能是感知、认知和学习的基础。神经技术的最新进展提供了使用频率调谐的幅度调制经颅交流电刺激(AM-tACS)非侵入性靶向这些振荡的方法。然而,由于刺激伪影阻碍了这种适应,特别是在目标频率下,对正在进行的脑振荡进行在线刺激参数适应仍然是一个未解决的问题。在这里,我们引入了一种实时兼容的伪影拒绝算法(刺激伪影源分离,SASS),克服了这一限制。SASS 是一种空间滤波器(线性投影),去除刺激存在和不存在时最大不同的 EEG 信号分量。这使得能够可靠地去除刺激特异性信号分量,同时不影响生理信号分量。为了验证 SASS,我们使用 7 名健康志愿者的 10 Hz 视觉闪烁来诱发具有已知相位和幅度的脑活动。在视觉皮层靶向 10 Hz AM-tACS 期间和不存在 AM-tACS 时记录 64 通道 EEG。AM-tACS 与视觉刺激之间的相位差是随机的,因此稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)与视觉刺激而不是 AM-tACS 信号锁相。为了验证,比较了每个参与者在 AM-tACS 期间和不存在 AM-tACS 时记录的 EEG 信号的单个试验幅度和相位分布。当未应用任何伪影拒绝方法时,AM-tACS 刺激伪影阻碍了对单个 SSVEP 幅度和相位的评估。使用 SASS,在 AM-tACS 期间和不存在 AM-tACS 时记录的单个试验的幅度和相位是可比的。这些结果表明,SASS 可用于建立自适应(闭环)AM-tACS,这是靶向各种大脑功能的潜在强大工具,并研究 AM-tACS 如何与脑电振荡相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d1e8/7903161/32116aa5e47d/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验