Experimental Psychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, Cluster for Excellence "Hearing for All", Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany; Neuroimaging Unit, European Medical School, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.068. Epub 2018 May 31.
Amplitude modulated transcranial alternating current stimulation (AM-tACS) has been recently proposed as a possible solution to overcome the pronounced stimulation artifact encountered when recording brain activity during tACS. In theory, AM-tACS does not entail power at its modulating frequency, thus avoiding the problem of spectral overlap between brain signal of interest and stimulation artifact. However, the current study demonstrates how weak non-linear transfer characteristics inherent to stimulation and recording hardware can reintroduce spurious artifacts at the modulation frequency. The input-output transfer functions (TFs) of different stimulation setups were measured. Setups included recordings of signal-generator and stimulator outputs and M/EEG phantom measurements. 6-degree polynomial regression models were fitted to model the input-output TFs of each setup. The resulting TF models were applied to digitally generated AM-tACS signals to predict the frequency of spurious artifacts in the spectrum. All four setups measured for the study exhibited low-frequency artifacts at the modulation frequency and its harmonics when recording AM-tACS. Fitted TF models showed non-linear contributions significantly different from zero (all p < .05) and successfully predicted the frequency of artifacts observed in AM-signal recordings. Results suggest that even weak non-linearities of stimulation and recording hardware can lead to spurious artifacts at the modulation frequency and its harmonics. These artifacts were substantially larger than alpha-oscillations of a human subject in the MEG. Findings emphasize the need for more linear stimulation devices for AM-tACS and careful analysis procedures, taking into account low-frequency artifacts to avoid confusion with effects of AM-tACS on the brain.
幅度调制经颅交流电刺激(AM-tACS)最近被提出作为一种可能的解决方案,以克服在 tACS 期间记录脑活动时遇到的明显刺激伪影。从理论上讲,AM-tACS 不需要调制频率的功率,从而避免了感兴趣的脑信号和刺激伪影之间的频谱重叠问题。然而,本研究展示了刺激和记录硬件固有的微弱非线性传递特性如何在调制频率下重新引入虚假伪影。测量了不同刺激设置的输入-输出传递函数(TF)。设置包括信号发生器和刺激器输出的记录以及 M/EEG 体模测量。使用 6 次多项式回归模型拟合来对每个设置的输入-输出 TF 进行建模。将得到的 TF 模型应用于数字生成的 AM-tACS 信号,以预测频谱中虚假伪影的频率。研究中测量的所有四个设置在记录 AM-tACS 时都在调制频率及其谐波处显示出低频伪影。拟合的 TF 模型显示非线性贡献显著不为零(所有 p 值均<0.05),并且成功预测了在 AM 信号记录中观察到的伪影的频率。结果表明,即使刺激和记录硬件的弱非线性也会导致调制频率及其谐波处的虚假伪影。这些伪影明显大于 MEG 中人类受试者的 alpha 振荡。研究结果强调了 AM-tACS 更需要线性刺激设备和仔细的分析程序,考虑到低频伪影,以避免与 AM-tACS 对大脑的影响混淆。