CT Texture Analysis: A Potential Biomarker for Evaluating KRAS Mutational Status in Colorectal Cancer.

Objective Texture analysis is deemed to reflect intratumor heterogeneity invisible to the naked eyes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of assessing the KRAS mutational status in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using CT texture analysis. Methods This retrospective study included 92 patients who had histopathologically confirmed CRC and underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT examinations. The patients were assigned into a training cohort (=51) and a validation cohort (=41). We placed the region of interest in the tumour regions on the selected axial images using software of TexRad to extract a series of quantitative parameters based on the spatial scaling factors (SSFs), including mean, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean of positive pixels (MPP), skewness, and kurtosis. The texture parameters and clinical characteristics (age, gender, tumour location, histopathology, tumour size, T, N, M stages) were compared between the mutated and wild-type KRAS patient groups in training cohort and validation cohort. Before building the multiple feature classifier, we calculated the correlations of the features using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and if any two features were significantly correlated, the one with lower AUC was removed. Ultimately, only the most discriminative isolated features were combined to train a supporting vector machine (SVM) classifier. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was processed for evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of texture parameters in differentiating CRC patients with mutated KRAS from those with wild-type KRAS. Results None of the clinical characteristics were significant different between CRC patients with wild-type KRAS and mutated KRAS in both cohorts. For predicting the expression of mutated KRAS in CRC patients, the perfect model which combined skewness on SSF 5 by unenhanced CT, entropy on SSF 2, skewness and kurtosis on SSF 0, and kurtosis and mean on SSF 3 by enhanced CT, showed a desirable AUC of 0.951 (95% : 0.895-1, <0.001), with a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 91.7%, when the cut-off value was 0.46 in the training cohort; while in the validation cohort, the AUC value was 0.995 (95% : 0.982-1, <0.001), the sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 93.7% when the cut-off value was 0.28. Conclusion It is feasible to evaluate the KRAS mutational status in CRC using CT texture analysis.