LaSCOLA Phil, Heidorn C Eric, Pollock Brandon, Burns Keith, McDANIEL John
Department of Exercise Science, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.
Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Dec 1;13(2):1487-1500. doi: 10.70252/PCCP9259. eCollection 2020.
Single-leg cycling (SLC) allows for a greater muscle specific exercise capacity and therefore provides a greater stimulus for metabolic and vascular adaptations compared to double-leg cycling (DLC). The purpose of this investigation was to compare the cardiovascular, peripheral, and metabolic responses of counterweighted (10kg) SLC to DLC in a healthy older male population. Eleven males (56-86 years) performed two cycling modalities consisting of DLC and SLC. For each modality, participants performed 4-minute cycling trials (60rpm) at three work rates (25, 50, 75W). Repeated measures ANOVAs and paired samples T-test (α=0.05) were used to assess differences in physiological and perceptual responses. Heart rate (100±21 vs. 103±20bpm), oxygen uptake (12.1±3.6 vs. 11.7±2.8mLkgmin) and mean arterial pressure (104±13 vs. 108±12mmHg) were not different between DLC and SLC, respectively. Femoral blood flow was greater during SLC at 50W (741.4±290.3 vs. 509.0±230.8mL/min) and 75W (993.8±236.2 vs. 680.6±278.0mL/min) (p≤0.01). Furthermore, carbohydrate oxidation during SLC was 30-40% greater than DLC across work rates (p≤0.011). Whole body rating of perceived exertion (RPE) at 25 and 50W were not different (p=0.065), however, whole body RPE at 75W and leg RPE were higher for SLC at all intensities (p≤0.018). Liking scores were not different between cycling modalities (p=0.060). At low and moderate intensities, SLC provides a greater peripheral stress with no difference in cardiovascular responses compared to DLC in a healthy older adult male population. Thus, SLC may be a feasible exercise modality to maximize peripheral adaptations for healthy and diseased (i.e. peripheral vascular disease/cardiovascular disease) older population.
单腿骑行(SLC)能实现更大的肌肉特定运动能力,因此与双腿骑行(DLC)相比,能为代谢和血管适应性提供更大的刺激。本研究的目的是比较在健康老年男性群体中,负重(10千克)单腿骑行与双腿骑行时的心血管、外周和代谢反应。11名男性(56 - 86岁)进行了两种骑行方式,包括双腿骑行和单腿骑行。对于每种方式,参与者在三种工作强度(25、50、75瓦)下进行4分钟的骑行试验(60转/分钟)。采用重复测量方差分析和配对样本t检验(α = 0.05)来评估生理和感知反应的差异。双腿骑行和单腿骑行时的心率(分别为100±21与103±20次/分钟)、摄氧量(12.1±3.6与11.7±2.8毫升·千克·分钟)和平均动脉压(104±13与108±12毫米汞柱)并无差异。在50瓦(741.4±290.3与509.0±230.8毫升/分钟)和75瓦(993.8±236.2与680.6±278.0毫升/分钟)时,单腿骑行时的股血流量更大(p≤0.01)。此外,在所有工作强度下,单腿骑行时的碳水化合物氧化比双腿骑行高30 - 40%(p≤0.011)。在25瓦和50瓦时,全身主观用力程度(RPE)无差异(p = 0.065),然而,在75瓦时,单腿骑行的全身RPE以及在所有强度下单腿骑行的腿部RPE更高(p≤0.018)。两种骑行方式的喜好评分无差异(p = 0.060)。在低强度和中等强度下,与双腿骑行相比,单腿骑行在健康老年男性群体中能提供更大的外周压力,而心血管反应无差异。因此,对于健康和患病(即外周血管疾病/心血管疾病)的老年人群,单腿骑行可能是一种可行的运动方式,以最大化外周适应性。