• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国海军陆战队体能测试与战斗体能测试结果的比较

A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.

作者信息

Keefer Marc, Debeliso Mark

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Outdoor Recreation, Southern Utah University, Cedar City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Dec 1;13(4):1741-1755. doi: 10.70252/HCZX4482. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.70252/HCZX4482
PMID:33414879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7745917/
Abstract

The United States Marines Corps (USMC) have installed a Physical Fitness Test (PFT) to measure physical fitness levels and a Combat Fitness Test (CFT) to assess a Marine's functional fitness as it relates to the demands of combat operations. The PFT involves three events; pull-ups/push-ups (PU), two-minute abdominal crunches/sit-ups (AC), and a timed three-mile run (RUN). The CFT also involves three events; Movement to Contact (MTC), two-minute Ammunition Lift (AL), and Maneuver-Under-Fire (MANUF). It is of interest to determine if the PFT and CFT are both necessary. As such, the purpose of this study was to determine the degree of relationships between PFT (PU, AC, RUN, and total) and CFT (MTC, AL, MANUF, and total) scores of active duty Marines. The PFT and CFT scores from 19,678 active duty enlisted USMC males (age 22.5±1.3 years, height 1.77±0.07 m, body mass 79.4±10.3 kg) were analyzed. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between the PFT and CFT total scores as well as individual events. The PFT mean±sd scores were as follows: PU=18.0±5.0 (pull-ups), AC=111.2±9.0 (repetitions), RUN=1377.0±131.4 sec, PFT total=249.6±29.6. The CFT mean±sd scores were as follows: MTC=172.5±16.3 sec, AL=113.2±10.4 repetitions, MANUF=138.3±17.2 sec, CFT total=271.6±25.6. Moderate significant (p<0.01) correlations were found between: the PFT total and MTC (r=-0.47), PFT total and MANUF (r=-0.42), PFT total and CFT total (r=0.50), RUN and MTC (r=0.46), RUN and CFT total (r=-0.43), & PU and CFT total (r=0.41). Other correlations between variables yielded "no to low" association but were also significant due to the large sample size. Within the parameters of this study, PFT and CFT event scores demonstrated no to moderate correlations suggesting that different fitness characteristics are being assessed and supports the need for both the PFT and CFT assessments.

摘要

美国海军陆战队(USMC)设立了体能测试(PFT)来衡量体能水平,并设立了战斗体能测试(CFT)来评估海军陆战队员与作战行动需求相关的功能性体能。体能测试包括三项内容:引体向上/俯卧撑(PU)、两分钟仰卧起坐(AC)以及三英里定时跑(RUN)。战斗体能测试也包括三项内容:接敌运动(MTC)、两分钟弹药搬运(AL)以及火力下机动(MANUF)。确定体能测试和战斗体能测试是否都有必要很有意义。因此,本研究的目的是确定现役海军陆战队员的体能测试(PU、AC、RUN和总分)与战斗体能测试(MTC、AL、MANUF和总分)分数之间的关联程度。分析了19678名现役美国海军陆战队男性士兵(年龄22.5±1.3岁,身高1.77±0.07米,体重79.4±10.3千克)的体能测试和战斗体能测试分数。计算了体能测试和战斗体能测试总分以及各项内容之间的皮尔逊相关系数(r)。体能测试的平均±标准差分数如下:PU = 18.0±5.0(引体向上),AC = 111.2±9.0(次数),RUN = 1377.0±131.4秒,体能测试总分 = 249.6±29.6。战斗体能测试的平均±标准差分数如下:MTC = 172.5±16.3秒,AL = 113.2±10.4次,MANUF = 138.3±17.2秒,战斗体能测试总分 = 271.6±25.6。在以下各项之间发现了中度显著(p<0.01)的相关性:体能测试总分与接敌运动(r = -0.47)、体能测试总分与火力下机动(r = -0.42)、体能测试总分与战斗体能测试总分(r = 0.50)、跑步与接敌运动(r = 0.46)、跑步与战斗体能测试总分(r = -0.43)以及引体向上与战斗体能测试总分(r = 0.41)。变量之间的其他相关性显示为“无至低”关联,但由于样本量较大也具有显著性。在本研究的参数范围内,体能测试和战斗体能测试项目分数显示出无至中度的相关性,这表明正在评估不同的体能特征,并支持同时进行体能测试和战斗体能测试评估的必要性。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of United States Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test and Combat Fitness Test Results.美国海军陆战队体能测试与战斗体能测试结果的比较
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Dec 1;13(4):1741-1755. doi: 10.70252/HCZX4482. eCollection 2020.
2
Decreased Percent Body Fat but Not Body Mass is Associated with Better Performance on Combat Fitness Test in Male and Female Marines.体脂百分比降低而非体重降低与男女海军陆战队队员战斗体能测试的更好表现相关。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Apr 1;37(4):887-893. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004335. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
3
The 300 Marines: characterizing the US Marines with perfect scores on their physical and combat fitness tests.300名海军陆战队员:对在体能和战斗适应性测试中获得满分的美国海军陆战队员进行特征描述。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jun 18;15:1406749. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1406749. eCollection 2024.
4
United States Marine Corps Recruit Training Demands Associated With Performance Outcomes.美国海军陆战队新兵训练要求与绩效结果的关联。
Mil Med. 2024 Jun 26;189(Supplement_2):84-93. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae124.
5
Unsupervised Machine Learning in Countermovement Jump and Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull Performance Produces Distinct Combat and Physical Fitness Clusters in Male and Female U.S. Marine Corps Recruits.无监督机器学习在反跳和等长大腿中部拉伸性能中产生了不同的战斗和体能聚类,在男性和女性美国海军陆战队员新兵中。
Mil Med. 2024 Jun 26;189(Supplement_2):38-46. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usad371.
6
Fight load index and body composition are most associated with combat fitness in female Marines.战斗负荷指数和身体成分与女性海军陆战队员的作战体能最相关。
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Apr;22(4):494-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
7
Greater ankle strength, anaerobic and aerobic capacity, and agility predict Ground Combat Military Occupational School graduation in female Marines.更强的踝关节力量、无氧和有氧能力以及敏捷性可预测女性海军陆战队地面战斗军事职业学校的毕业情况。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Nov;20 Suppl 4:S85-S90. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
8
A descriptive study of the U.S. Marine Corps fitness tests (2000-2012).美国海军陆战队体能测试(2000 - 2012年)的描述性研究。
Mil Med. 2015 May;180(5):513-7. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00490.
9
Performance differences between male and female marines on standardized physical fitness tests and combat proxy tasks: identifying the gap.男性和女性海军陆战队队员在标准化体能测试和战斗模拟任务中的表现差异:找出差距
US Army Med Dep J. 2015 Apr-Jun:12-21.
10
Retrospective Cohort Analysis of the Army Physical Fitness Test and the Occupational Physical Assessment Test in Reserve Officer Training Corps Cadets: A Brief Report.回顾性队列分析陆军体能测试和后备军官训练团学员职业体能评估测试:简要报告。
Mil Med. 2020 Aug 14;185(7-8):e937-e943. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz489.

引用本文的文献

1
The 300 Marines: characterizing the US Marines with perfect scores on their physical and combat fitness tests.300名海军陆战队员:对在体能和战斗适应性测试中获得满分的美国海军陆战队员进行特征描述。
Front Physiol. 2024 Jun 18;15:1406749. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1406749. eCollection 2024.
2
IJES Self-Study on Participants' Sex in Exercise Science: Sex-Data Gap and Corresponding Author Survey.《国际运动科学杂志》关于运动科学参与者性别的自我研究:性别数据差距及通讯作者调查
Int J Exerc Sci. 2023 Mar 1;16(6):364-376. doi: 10.70252/DZZC8088. eCollection 2023.
3
Resilience, Psychological Stress, Physical Activity, and BMI among United States Air National Guardsmen: The COVID-19 Pandemic.美国空军国民警卫队成员的心理韧性、心理压力、身体活动与体重指数:COVID-19大流行期间情况
J Lifestyle Med. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):26-36. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2022.12.1.26.
4
Tactical Masters Athletes: BMI Index Classifications.战术大师运动员:体重指数分类
Sports (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;10(2):22. doi: 10.3390/sports10020022.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Issues Relating to Scientific Discovery in Exercise Science.运动科学中与科学发现相关的伦理问题。
Int J Exerc Sci. 2020 Sep 1;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.70252/EYCD6235. eCollection 2019.
2
A longitudinal analysis of the U.S. Air Force reserve officers' training corps physical fitness assessment.美国空军后备军官训练队体能评估的纵向分析。
Mil Med Res. 2019 Sep 23;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40779-019-0219-4.
3
The Warrior Model for Human Performance Optimization.人类绩效优化的勇士模型。
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2019 Sep;27(3):99-106. doi: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000248.
4
Exercise Testing of Muscle Strength in Military.军事领域中肌肉力量的运动测试
Mil Med. 2019 Oct 1;184(9-10):e426-e430. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz152.
5
International consensus on military research priorities and gaps - Survey results from the 4th International Congress on Soldiers' Physical Performance.国际军事研究重点和差距共识——第四届国际士兵体能大会调查结果。
J Sci Med Sport. 2018 Nov;21(11):1125-1130. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.05.028. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Military Task Performance: Maximal Lift Capacity.军事任务表现预测因素的系统评价与Meta分析:最大举重能力
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):1142-1164. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001790.
7
Operational Physical Performance and Fitness in Military Women: Physiological, Musculoskeletal Injury, and Optimized Physical Training Considerations for Successfully Integrating Women Into Combat-Centric Military Occupations.军事女性的作战体能表现与健康状况:生理、肌肉骨骼损伤以及将女性成功融入以战斗为中心的军事职业的优化体能训练考量
Mil Med. 2016 Jan;181(1 Suppl):50-62. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00382.
8
Human Performance Optimization Metrics: Consensus Findings, Gaps, and Recommendations for Future Research.人类绩效优化指标:共识性发现、差距及未来研究建议
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S221-45. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001114.
9
Executive Summary From the National Strength and Conditioning Association's Second Blue Ribbon Panel on Military Physical Readiness: Military Physical Performance Testing.执行摘要 来自美国国家体能协会军事体能准备情况第二次蓝带小组:军事体能测试。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S216-20. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001037.
10
Physical Training Strategies for Military Women's Performance Optimization in Combat-Centric Occupations.以战斗为中心的军事职业中优化军事女性表现的体能训练策略。
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Nov;29 Suppl 11:S101-6. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001089.