• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

增加社区参与公共卫生研究:概念图方法的应用。

Increasing Community Participation in Public Health Research: Applications for Concept Mapping Methodology.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(2):243-250. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0025.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2020.0025
PMID:33416645
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Concept mapping builds on other qualitative methods widely used in community-engaged research and community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches by adding intentional participatory elements to engage stakeholders and increased data collection structure via built-in quantitative elements.

OBJECTIVES

This article presents examples of community-based studies using concept mapping to illustrate how public health researchers can use this method to incorporate participatory elements in projects that vary by research objective and degrees of community engagement.

METHODS

Drawing from our previous experience, we present four participatory concept mapping projects. These illustrative research examples focus on projects developed by academic-community partnerships, including a hospital-based community needs assessment, the creation of a domestic violence research agenda, the study of trust in community-academic partnerships, and the development of strategies to address breast cancer through a county-level collaborative.

CONCLUSIONS

Through the use of illustrative examples, we provide four research-based applications of concept mapping with a variety of community engagement levels. These examples show how the use of concept mapping as a research method allows for the direct participation of community stakeholders to move research agendas forward. Concept mapping generates this forward movement in public health research through the production of visual representations and action-oriented results that promote the ability of stakeholders to have increased ownership in the improvement of health outcomes in their communities.

摘要

背景

概念图通过在社区参与式研究和社区为基础的参与式研究 (CBPR) 方法中加入有意的参与性元素,为其他广泛用于社区参与式研究和社区为基础的参与式研究 (CBPR) 的定性方法提供了支持,并通过内置的定量元素增加了数据收集结构。

目的

本文通过使用概念图进行社区为基础的研究示例来说明公共卫生研究人员如何将这种方法用于将参与性元素纳入研究项目中,这些项目的研究目标和社区参与程度各不相同。

方法

我们从之前的经验中提取了四个参与式概念图项目。这些说明性研究示例重点介绍了由学术-社区伙伴关系开发的项目,包括医院社区需求评估、制定家庭暴力研究议程、研究社区-学术伙伴关系中的信任、以及通过县级合作制定解决乳腺癌问题的策略。

结论

通过使用说明性示例,我们提供了四个具有不同社区参与程度的基于研究的概念图应用。这些示例展示了如何将概念图作为一种研究方法,让社区利益相关者直接参与,推动研究议程的发展。概念图通过生成可视化表示和面向行动的结果,促进利益相关者在改善社区健康结果方面增加所有权,从而在公共卫生研究中推动这种前进。

相似文献

1
Increasing Community Participation in Public Health Research: Applications for Concept Mapping Methodology.增加社区参与公共卫生研究:概念图方法的应用。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(2):243-250. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0025.
2
A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects.基于社区参与式研究的现实主义评价:伙伴关系协同效应、信任建立及相关连锁反应。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:725. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1.
3
Conceptualizing trust in community-academic research partnerships using concept mapping approach: A multi-CTSA study.使用概念图方法构建社区-学术研究伙伴关系中的信任概念:一项多CTSA研究。
Eval Program Plann. 2018 Feb;66:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Concept mapping methodology and community-engaged research: A perfect pairing.概念图方法与社区参与式研究:完美结合。
Eval Program Plann. 2017 Feb;60:229-237. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
5
Measuring Community-Engaged Research Contexts, Processes, and Outcomes: A Mapping Review.测量社区参与式研究的背景、过程和结果:一个映射综述。
Milbank Q. 2020 Jun;98(2):493-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12458. Epub 2020 May 19.
6
Establishing New Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships using the Community-Based Participatory Research Charrette Model: Lessons from the Cancer Health Accountability for Managing Pain and Symptoms Study.使用基于社区的参与式研究工作坊模式建立新的基于社区的参与式研究伙伴关系:癌症疼痛和症状管理健康问责制研究的经验教训。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(1):89-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0010.
7
Farmworker pesticide exposure and community-based participatory research: rationale and practical applications.农场工人的农药暴露与社区参与式研究:基本原理与实际应用
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):429-34. doi: 10.1289/ehp.01109s3429.
8
Engage for Equity: The Role of Trust and Synergy in Community-Based Participatory Research.为公平而参与:信任与协同在社区参与式研究中的作用
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):372-379. doi: 10.1177/1090198120918838.
9
Creating academic-community partnerships to jointly enhance advocacy and research on violence and disability: Two case examples.建立学术机构与社区的伙伴关系以共同加强对暴力与残疾问题的宣传和研究:两个案例
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Sep;14(6):956-963. doi: 10.1037/tra0001135. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
10
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Routes of Well-Being, Spiritual Harmony and Recovery in Mental Health: The Community as a Policy-Maker.心理健康中的幸福、精神和谐与康复途径:作为政策制定者的社区
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8390. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8390. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
2
Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study.在全州癌症需求评估中收集社区观点:在线焦点小组研究
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 31;11:e63717. doi: 10.2196/63717.
3
Factors Affecting Family Medicine Residents' Decision to Provide Obstetric Care: A Concept Mapping Study.
影响家庭医学住院医师提供产科护理决策的因素:一项概念图研究
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Apr;17(2):172-181. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00541.1. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
4
Co-creation methods for public health research - characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review.公共卫生研究的共创方法——特点、益处及挑战:一项健康级联范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02514-4.
5
Parental Perceptions of Priorities and Features for a Mobile App to Promote Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors in Preschool Children: Mixed Methods Evaluation.家长对一款促进学龄前儿童健康生活方式行为的移动应用程序的优先级和功能的看法:混合方法评估
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2025 Feb 19;8:e65451. doi: 10.2196/65451.
6
A Community-Engaged, Mixed-Methods Approach to Prioritizing Needs in a Statewide Assessment of Community Cancer Needs.一种社区参与的混合方法,用于在全州社区癌症需求评估中确定需求的优先级。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Dec 26;21:E103. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.240183.
7
Empowerment Among Adolescent Girls in Nepal: A Concept Mapping Exploratory Study.尼泊尔少女赋权:概念映射探索性研究。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Jun 27;12(3). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00010.
8
A framework and process for community-engaged, mixed-methods cancer needs assessments.社区参与式、混合方法癌症需求评估的框架和流程。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Oct;35(10):1319-1332. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01892-2. Epub 2024 May 29.