Suppr超能文献

在受控动物模型中比较麻醉下静态和动态脑自动调节的影响。

Comparison of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation under anesthesia influence in a controlled animal model.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Neuroscience Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 8;16(1):e0245291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245291. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The brain's ability to maintain cerebral blood flow approximately constant despite cerebral perfusion pressure changes is known as cerebral autoregulation (CA) and is governed by vasoconstriction and vasodilation. Cerebral perfusion pressure is defined as the pressure gradient between arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Measuring CA is a challenging task and has created a variety of evaluation methods, which are often categorized as static and dynamic CA assessments. Because CA is quantified as the performance of a regulatory system and no physical ground truth can be measured, conflicting results are reported. The conflict further arises from a lack of healthy volunteer data with respect to cerebral perfusion pressure measurements and the variety of diseases in which CA ability is impaired, including stroke, traumatic brain injury and hydrocephalus. To overcome these differences, we present a healthy non-human primate model in which we can control the ability to autoregulate blood flow through the type of anesthesia (isoflurane vs fentanyl). We show how three different assessment methods can be used to measure CA impairment, and how static and dynamic autoregulation compare under challenges in intracranial pressure and blood pressure. We reconstructed Lassen's curve for two groups of anesthesia, where only the fentanyl anesthetized group yielded the canonical shape. Cerebral perfusion pressure allowed for the best distinction between the fentanyl and isoflurane anesthetized groups. The autoregulatory response time to induced oscillations in intracranial pressure and blood pressure, measured as the phase lag between intracranial pressure and blood pressure, was able to determine autoregulatory impairment in agreement with static autoregulation. Static and dynamic CA both show impairment in high dose isoflurane anesthesia, while low isoflurane in combination with fentanyl anesthesia maintains CA, offering a repeatable animal model for CA studies.

摘要

大脑在脑灌注压变化时维持脑血流大致恒定的能力被称为脑自动调节(CA),由血管收缩和血管舒张来调节。脑灌注压定义为动脉血压和颅内压之间的压力梯度。测量 CA 是一项具有挑战性的任务,已经创建了各种评估方法,这些方法通常分为静态和动态 CA 评估。由于 CA 被量化为调节系统的性能,并且没有可以测量的物理基准,因此报告了相互矛盾的结果。这种冲突进一步源于缺乏关于脑灌注压测量的健康志愿者数据,以及 CA 能力受损的各种疾病,包括中风、创伤性脑损伤和脑积水。为了克服这些差异,我们提出了一种健康的非人类灵长类动物模型,在该模型中,我们可以通过麻醉类型(异氟烷与芬太尼)来控制自动调节血流的能力。我们展示了如何使用三种不同的评估方法来测量 CA 损伤,以及在颅内压和血压挑战下,静态和动态自动调节如何进行比较。我们为两种麻醉类型重建了 Lassen 曲线,只有芬太尼麻醉组呈现出典型的形状。脑灌注压允许在芬太尼和异氟烷麻醉组之间做出最佳区分。颅内压和血压诱导的振荡的自动调节响应时间,以颅内压和血压之间的相位滞后来衡量,能够与静态自动调节一致地确定自动调节损伤。静态和动态 CA 在高剂量异氟烷麻醉下都显示出损伤,而低剂量异氟烷与芬太尼麻醉相结合则维持 CA,为 CA 研究提供了可重复的动物模型。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验