Suppr超能文献

评估抗抑郁药的录像技术

Videotape technique in assessing antidepressants.

作者信息

Little J C, McClelland H A, Kerr T A

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4Suppl 2(Suppl 2):227S-232S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb05757.x.

Abstract

In the search for superior levels of objectivity in research in clinical psychiatry videotape (VT), recordings were made of all clinical interviews with the first eleven patients entering a double-blind controlled trial of antidepressant drugs. The treating psychiatrist recorded diagnosis as listed in the ICD and described in its accompanying Glossary, and rated the Hamilton Depression Scale (HDS) at pretreatment and final interviews. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for depression was independently scored by psychiatrist and patient at each interview. VT recordings were despatched for independent repetition of diagnostic assessment and ratings of mood (HDS and VAS) by two further psychiatrists, creating in effect a multiple-blind study. Agreement was satisfactory on ICD listed diagnoses and complete for the broad category of `affective disorder'. Between the three psychiatrists, there was a high correlation of HDS scores. Patients were independently agreed to form a group of moderately depressed subjects. Closely related degrees of improvement were recorded by the three psychiatrists in all patients. Correlation of scores were high for the VAS for depression as independently scored by patient, treating psychiatrist and the two VT viewers. The VAS was shown to be a simple, quick and reliable indicator of depressive mood suited to repeated use at short intervals. VT recordings are a useful tool in the search for higher levels of objectivity in clinical research. The technique described might well become as accepted in psychiatric drug trials as the blind control procedure.

摘要

为了在临床精神病学研究中寻求更高水平的客观性,对参加抗抑郁药物双盲对照试验的前11名患者的所有临床访谈进行了录像(VT)。主治精神科医生记录了国际疾病分类(ICD)中列出并在其附带词汇表中描述的诊断,并在治疗前和末次访谈时对汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDS)进行评分。在每次访谈时,精神科医生和患者会独立对抑郁视觉模拟量表(VAS)进行评分。VT录像被发送给另外两名精神科医生,由他们独立重复进行诊断评估和情绪评分(HDS和VAS),实际上形成了一项多盲研究。对于ICD列出的诊断,一致性令人满意,对于“情感障碍”这一广泛类别则完全一致。在三位精神科医生之间,HDS评分具有高度相关性。患者被独立认定为一组中度抑郁的受试者。三位精神科医生记录了所有患者程度相近的改善情况。患者、主治精神科医生和两位VT观看者独立评分的抑郁VAS得分之间相关性很高。VAS被证明是一种简单、快速且可靠的抑郁情绪指标,适合在短时间间隔内重复使用。VT录像在临床研究中寻求更高水平的客观性方面是一种有用的工具。所描述的技术很可能会像盲法对照程序一样在精神科药物试验中被广泛接受。

相似文献

1
Videotape technique in assessing antidepressants.评估抗抑郁药的录像技术
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4Suppl 2(Suppl 2):227S-232S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb05757.x.
2
A clinical comparison of nomifensine and amitriptyline.诺米芬辛与阿米替林的临床比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4Suppl 2(Suppl 2):233S-236S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb05758.x.
4
Comparison of nomifensine and placebo.诺米芬辛与安慰剂的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4Suppl 2(Suppl 2):209S-213S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb05754.x.
9
Assessing antidepressants' effectiveness.
Am J Psychiatry. 1971 Jun;127(12):1698-700. doi: 10.1176/ajp.127.12.1698-a.

引用本文的文献

1
Where are the untreated depressives?未经治疗的抑郁症患者在哪里?
Br Med J. 1978 Jun 17;1(6127):1593-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6127.1593-a.
2
A clinical comparison of nomifensine and amitriptyline.诺米芬辛与阿米替林的临床比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4Suppl 2(Suppl 2):233S-236S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb05758.x.

本文引用的文献

1
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
2
Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness.原发性抑郁症评定量表的编制。
Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1967 Dec;6(4):278-96. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1967.tb00530.x.
3
Measurement of mood.情绪测量。
Proc R Soc Med. 1969 Oct;62(10):993-6. doi: 10.1177/003591576906201006.
4
Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales.使用视觉模拟量表测量情感。
Proc R Soc Med. 1969 Oct;62(10):989-93. doi: 10.1177/003591576906201005.
6
Measures of depressive mood at monthly intervals.
Br J Psychiatry. 1973 Apr;122(569):447-52. doi: 10.1192/bjp.122.4.447.
7
Psychiatric diagnoses: a study of how they are made.
Br J Psychiatry. 1973 Apr;122(569):437-45. doi: 10.1192/bjp.122.4.437.
8
Objectivity in clinical psychiatric research.临床精神病学研究中的客观性。
Lancet. 1968 Nov 16;2(7577):1072-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91545-6.
9
A clinical comparison of nomifensine and amitriptyline.诺米芬辛与阿米替林的临床比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1977;4Suppl 2(Suppl 2):233S-236S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1977.tb05758.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验