Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
FaunaStats, 16 avenue de l'Europe, Immeuble SXB1, 67300, Schiltigheim, France.
Anim Cogn. 2022 Oct;25(5):1357-1363. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01611-x. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
Among animals, the visual acuity of several predatory bird species is probably the most outstanding. This, and the ease with which visually based tasks are administered, has led researchers to predominantly use the visual modality when studying avian cognition. Some wild skua populations routinely use acoustic cues emitted by their prey during foraging. In this study, we thus assessed whether this species was able to locate hidden food using acoustic cues alone (training phase). During the subsequent test phase, we investigated the capacity of successful individuals to choose the correct baited container in four conditions: (i) baited (shaking the baited container), (ii) full information (shaking both containers), (iii) exclusion (shaking the empty container), and (iv) control (shaking neither container). Four out of ten subjects succeeded in locating the baited container in the training phase. During the test phase, most subjects chose the baited container significantly more than the empty container in the baited and full information condition, while their performance was at chance level in the control condition. When no sound emanated from the empty container in the exclusion condition, one out of four skuas chose the baited container with more accuracy than predicted by chance. As this bird chose correctly on the first trial and during the first five trials, its performance is unlikely due to learning processes (learning to exclude the empty container). Although further tests are necessary to draw firm conclusions, our results open the way for assessing further this species' reasoning abilities in the wild.
在动物中,几种猛禽的视力可能是最突出的。这一点,以及视觉任务易于进行,使得研究人员在研究鸟类认知时主要使用视觉模式。一些野生贼鸥种群在觅食时经常利用猎物发出的听觉线索。在这项研究中,我们因此评估了该物种是否能够仅通过听觉线索找到隐藏的食物(训练阶段)。在随后的测试阶段,我们在四种条件下研究了成功个体选择正确诱饵容器的能力:(i)诱饵(摇晃诱饵容器),(ii)全信息(摇晃两个容器),(iii)排除(摇晃空容器)和(iv)对照(不摇晃任何容器)。十个实验对象中有四个在训练阶段成功找到了诱饵容器。在测试阶段,大多数实验对象在诱饵和全信息条件下选择诱饵容器的次数明显多于空容器,而在对照条件下,它们的表现处于随机水平。当空容器没有声音发出时,在排除条件下,四只贼鸥中有一只选择诱饵容器的准确性高于随机预测。由于这只鸟在第一次尝试和前五次尝试中都选择正确,因此它的表现不太可能是由于学习过程(学会排除空容器)。尽管还需要进一步的测试来得出明确的结论,但我们的结果为在野外进一步评估该物种的推理能力开辟了道路。