Suppr超能文献

不确定性下的情绪与决策:生理唤醒预示着在模糊情境而非风险情境下赌博行为的增加。

Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.

作者信息

FeldmanHall Oriel, Glimcher Paul, Baker Augustus L, Phelps Elizabeth A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University.

Center for Neural Science, New York University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1037/xge0000205.

Abstract

Uncertainty, which is ubiquitous in decision-making, can be fractionated into known probabilities (risk) and unknown probabilities (ambiguity). Although research has illustrated that individuals more often avoid decisions associated with ambiguity compared to risk, it remains unclear why ambiguity is perceived as more aversive. Here we examine the role of arousal in shaping the representation of value and subsequent choice under risky and ambiguous decisions. To investigate the relationship between arousal and decisions of uncertainty, we measure skin conductance response-a quantifiable measure reflecting sympathetic nervous system arousal-during choices to gamble under risk and ambiguity. To quantify the discrete influences of risk and ambiguity sensitivity and the subjective value of each option under consideration, we model fluctuating uncertainty, as well as the amount of money that can be gained by taking the gamble. Results reveal that although arousal tracks the subjective value of a lottery regardless of uncertainty type, arousal differentially contributes to the computation of value-that is, choice-depending on whether the uncertainty is risky or ambiguous: Enhanced arousal adaptively decreases risk-taking only when the lottery is highly risky but increases risk-taking when the probability of winning is ambiguous (even after controlling for subjective value). Together, this suggests that the role of arousal during decisions of uncertainty is modulatory and highly dependent on the context in which the decision is framed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

不确定性在决策过程中普遍存在,它可被细分为已知概率(风险)和未知概率(模糊性)。尽管研究表明,与风险相比,个体更常回避与模糊性相关的决策,但尚不清楚为何模糊性会被视为更令人厌恶。在此,我们研究了唤醒在塑造风险和模糊决策下的价值表征及后续选择中的作用。为了探究唤醒与不确定性决策之间的关系,我们在风险和模糊情境下的赌博选择过程中,测量皮肤电导率反应——一种反映交感神经系统唤醒的可量化指标。为了量化风险和模糊性敏感性的离散影响以及所考虑的每个选项的主观价值,我们对波动的不确定性以及通过赌博可获得的金钱数额进行建模。结果显示,尽管无论不确定性类型如何,唤醒都跟踪彩票的主观价值,但唤醒对价值计算的贡献存在差异——也就是说,选择取决于不确定性是风险还是模糊性:仅当彩票风险很高时,增强的唤醒会适应性地降低冒险行为,但当获胜概率模糊时(即使在控制主观价值之后),唤醒会增加冒险行为。总之,这表明在不确定性决策过程中,唤醒的作用具有调节性,且高度依赖于决策所构建的背景。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》

相似文献

2
3
Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0228782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228782. eCollection 2020.
4
Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):1036-47. doi: 10.1152/jn.00853.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
5
Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 28;38(48):10362-10370. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1171-18.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1845-1859. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01162. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):572-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0.
8
Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity.
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.053. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
9
Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2043-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
10
Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing descriptive and theoretical models of decision-making under uncertainty and their relation to socioeconomic factors.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332189. eCollection 2025.
2
Exposure to subtle dominance cues activates the stress response and affects decision-making.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1517308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1517308. eCollection 2025.
4
Subjective probability is modulated by emotions.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92230-2.
5
Modeling decision-making under uncertainty with qualitative outcomes.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Mar 3;21(3):e1012440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012440. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Affective integration in experience, judgment, and decision-making.
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 20;2(1):126. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00178-2.
7
Background uncertainty does not increase risk aversion in decision making.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73650-y.
8
Heartfelt choices: The influence of cardiac phase on free-choice actions.
Psychophysiology. 2024 Dec;61(12):e14682. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14682. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
9
Neural correlates of reward valuation in individuals with nonsuicidal self-injury under uncertainty.
Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 6;54(12):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001363.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of Propranolol's Selective Effect on Loss Aversion.
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1123-30. doi: 10.1177/0956797615582026. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
2
Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits.
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:263-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014119. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Physiological and behavioral signatures of reflective exploratory choice.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec;14(4):1167-83. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0260-4.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17135-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207144109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
6
What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices.
Cognition. 2012 Jun;123(3):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
7
Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):1036-47. doi: 10.1152/jn.00853.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
8
Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):709-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014983.
9
Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5035-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806761106. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
10
Understanding risk: a guide for the perplexed.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):348-54. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.348.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验