• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不确定性下的情绪与决策:生理唤醒预示着在模糊情境而非风险情境下赌博行为的增加。

Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.

作者信息

FeldmanHall Oriel, Glimcher Paul, Baker Augustus L, Phelps Elizabeth A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New York University.

Center for Neural Science, New York University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1037/xge0000205.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000205
PMID:27690508
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5119758/
Abstract

Uncertainty, which is ubiquitous in decision-making, can be fractionated into known probabilities (risk) and unknown probabilities (ambiguity). Although research has illustrated that individuals more often avoid decisions associated with ambiguity compared to risk, it remains unclear why ambiguity is perceived as more aversive. Here we examine the role of arousal in shaping the representation of value and subsequent choice under risky and ambiguous decisions. To investigate the relationship between arousal and decisions of uncertainty, we measure skin conductance response-a quantifiable measure reflecting sympathetic nervous system arousal-during choices to gamble under risk and ambiguity. To quantify the discrete influences of risk and ambiguity sensitivity and the subjective value of each option under consideration, we model fluctuating uncertainty, as well as the amount of money that can be gained by taking the gamble. Results reveal that although arousal tracks the subjective value of a lottery regardless of uncertainty type, arousal differentially contributes to the computation of value-that is, choice-depending on whether the uncertainty is risky or ambiguous: Enhanced arousal adaptively decreases risk-taking only when the lottery is highly risky but increases risk-taking when the probability of winning is ambiguous (even after controlling for subjective value). Together, this suggests that the role of arousal during decisions of uncertainty is modulatory and highly dependent on the context in which the decision is framed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

不确定性在决策过程中普遍存在,它可被细分为已知概率(风险)和未知概率(模糊性)。尽管研究表明,与风险相比,个体更常回避与模糊性相关的决策,但尚不清楚为何模糊性会被视为更令人厌恶。在此,我们研究了唤醒在塑造风险和模糊决策下的价值表征及后续选择中的作用。为了探究唤醒与不确定性决策之间的关系,我们在风险和模糊情境下的赌博选择过程中,测量皮肤电导率反应——一种反映交感神经系统唤醒的可量化指标。为了量化风险和模糊性敏感性的离散影响以及所考虑的每个选项的主观价值,我们对波动的不确定性以及通过赌博可获得的金钱数额进行建模。结果显示,尽管无论不确定性类型如何,唤醒都跟踪彩票的主观价值,但唤醒对价值计算的贡献存在差异——也就是说,选择取决于不确定性是风险还是模糊性:仅当彩票风险很高时,增强的唤醒会适应性地降低冒险行为,但当获胜概率模糊时(即使在控制主观价值之后),唤醒会增加冒险行为。总之,这表明在不确定性决策过程中,唤醒的作用具有调节性,且高度依赖于决策所构建的背景。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/8d25c0231fae/nihms-795942-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/bd99cf0fe076/nihms-795942-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/108270697e44/nihms-795942-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/757dd040529f/nihms-795942-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/8d25c0231fae/nihms-795942-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/bd99cf0fe076/nihms-795942-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/108270697e44/nihms-795942-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/757dd040529f/nihms-795942-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7bd/5119758/8d25c0231fae/nihms-795942-f0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.不确定性下的情绪与决策:生理唤醒预示着在模糊情境而非风险情境下赌博行为的增加。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1037/xge0000205.
2
Body in the face of uncertainty: The role of autonomic arousal and interoception in decision-making under risk and ambiguity.面对不确定性的身体:自主唤醒和内脏感知在风险和模糊决策中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2021 Aug;58(8):e13840. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13840. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.了解埃尔斯伯格悖论会减少但不会消除模糊厌恶。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0228782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228782. eCollection 2020.
4
Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.风险与模糊下的主观价值的神经表示。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):1036-47. doi: 10.1152/jn.00853.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
5
Win-Concurrent Sensory Cues Can Promote Riskier Choice.正强化的感觉线索能促进风险选择。
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 28;38(48):10362-10370. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1171-18.2018. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
6
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes.风险和模糊态度的神经机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1845-1859. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01162. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
7
Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?模糊规避在决策过程中会影响框架效应吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):572-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0.
8
Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity.在模糊情境下的决策而非风险下的决策与赌博严重程度有关。
Psychiatry Res. 2012 Dec 30;200(2-3):568-74. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.053. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
9
Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.模糊性和风险对轻度阿尔茨海默病决策的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2043-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
10
Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.在涉及实物的风险和模糊性任务中,五岁儿童不会表现出模糊性厌恶。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing descriptive and theoretical models of decision-making under uncertainty and their relation to socioeconomic factors.比较不确定性下决策的描述性模型和理论模型及其与社会经济因素的关系。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332189. eCollection 2025.
2
Exposure to subtle dominance cues activates the stress response and affects decision-making.接触微妙的支配线索会激活应激反应并影响决策。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 26;16:1517308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1517308. eCollection 2025.
3
Age-related Increase in Locus Coeruleus Activity and Connectivity with Prefrontal Cortex during Ambiguity Processing.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of Propranolol's Selective Effect on Loss Aversion.普萘洛尔对损失厌恶的选择性作用的决定因素。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1123-30. doi: 10.1177/0956797615582026. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
2
Emotion and decision making: multiple modulatory neural circuits.情绪与决策:多个调节性神经回路。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:263-87. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014119. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Physiological and behavioral signatures of reflective exploratory choice.反思性探索选择的生理和行为特征
模糊处理过程中与年龄相关的蓝斑核活动增加及与前额叶皮质的连接
J Neurosci. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2059-24.2025.
4
Subjective probability is modulated by emotions.主观概率受情绪影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8895. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92230-2.
5
Modeling decision-making under uncertainty with qualitative outcomes.对具有定性结果的不确定性下的决策进行建模。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Mar 3;21(3):e1012440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012440. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Affective integration in experience, judgment, and decision-making.情感在体验、判断和决策中的整合。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Dec 20;2(1):126. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00178-2.
7
Background uncertainty does not increase risk aversion in decision making.背景不确定性不会增加决策中的风险规避。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73650-y.
8
Heartfelt choices: The influence of cardiac phase on free-choice actions.真心选择:心动相位对自由选择行为的影响。
Psychophysiology. 2024 Dec;61(12):e14682. doi: 10.1111/psyp.14682. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
9
Neural correlates of reward valuation in individuals with nonsuicidal self-injury under uncertainty.不确定性下非自杀性自伤个体奖励评估的神经关联
Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 6;54(12):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001363.
10
Quantitative vs. Qualitative Outcomes: A Longitudinal Study of Risk and Ambiguity in Monetary and Medical Decision-Making.定量结果与定性结果:货币与医疗决策中风险和模糊性的纵向研究
Res Sq. 2024 Jun 24:rs.3.rs-4249490. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4249490/v1.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Dec;14(4):1167-83. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0260-4.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Adolescents' risk-taking behavior is driven by tolerance to ambiguity.青少年的冒险行为是由对模糊性的容忍驱动的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17135-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1207144109. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
6
What we say and what we do: the relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices.言行一致:真实与假设道德选择之间的关系。
Cognition. 2012 Jun;123(3):434-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
7
Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.风险与模糊下的主观价值的神经表示。
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):1036-47. doi: 10.1152/jn.00853.2009. Epub 2009 Dec 23.
8
Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.风险选择中的情感与审慎过程:哥伦比亚卡片任务中冒险行为的年龄差异
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):709-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014983.
9
Thinking like a trader selectively reduces individuals' loss aversion.像交易者一样思考会有选择地降低个体的损失厌恶。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5035-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806761106. Epub 2009 Mar 16.
10
Understanding risk: a guide for the perplexed.理解风险:给困惑者的指南。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Dec;8(4):348-54. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.4.348.