Suppr超能文献

在多品种肉牛群体中应用元奠基者方法进行基因组评估

Applying the Metafounders Approach for Genomic Evaluation in a Multibreed Beef Cattle Population.

作者信息

Junqueira Vinícius Silva, Lopes Paulo Sávio, Lourenco Daniela, Silva Fabyano Fonseca E, Cardoso Fernando Flores

机构信息

Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil.

Breeding Research Department, Bayer Crop Science, Uberlândia, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2020 Dec 3;11:556399. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.556399. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Pedigree information is incomplete by nature and commonly not well-established because many of the genetic ties are not known or can be wrong. The genomic era brought new opportunities to assess relationships between individuals. However, when pedigree and genomic information are used simultaneously, which is the case of single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP), defining the genetic base is still a challenge. One alternative to overcome this challenge is to use metafounders, which are pseudo-individuals that describe the genetic relationship between the base population individuals. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of metafounders on the estimation of breeding values for tick resistance under ssGBLUP for a multibreed population composed by Hereford, Braford, and Zebu animals. Three different scenarios were studied: pedigree-based model (BLUP), ssGBLUP, and ssGBLUP with metafounders (ssGBLUPm). In ssGBLUPm, a total of four different metafounders based on breed of origin (i.e., Hereford, Braford, Zebu, and unknown) were included for the animals with missing parents. The relationship coefficient between metafounders was in average 0.54 (ranging from 0.34 to 0.96) suggesting an overlap between ancestor populations. The estimates of metafounder relationships indicate that Hereford and Zebu breeds have a possible common ancestral relationship. Inbreeding coefficients calculated following the metafounder approach had less negative values, suggesting that ancestral populations were large enough and that gametes inherited from the historical population were not identical. Variance components were estimated based on ssGBLUPm, ssGBLUP, and BLUP, but the values from ssGBLUPm were scaled to provide a fair comparison with estimates from the other two models. In general, additive, residual, and phenotypic variance components in the Hereford population were smaller than in Braford across different models. The addition of genomic information increased heritability for Hereford, possibly because of improved genetic relationships. As expected, genomic models had greater predictive ability, with an additional gain for ssGBLUPm over ssGBLUP. The increase in predictive ability was greater for Herefords. Our results show the potential of using metafounders to increase accuracy of GEBV, and therefore, the rate of genetic gain in beef cattle populations with partial levels of missing pedigree information.

摘要

系谱信息本质上是不完整的,而且通常难以完善,因为许多遗传关系并不明确或可能有误。基因组时代为评估个体间的关系带来了新机遇。然而,当同时使用系谱和基因组信息时(单步基因组最佳线性无偏预测法(ssGBLUP)就是这种情况),确定遗传基础仍然是一项挑战。克服这一挑战的一种方法是使用元奠基者,即描述基础群体个体间遗传关系的虚拟个体。本研究的目的是评估元奠基者对由赫里福德牛、布拉福德牛和瘤牛组成的多品种群体在ssGBLUP下蜱抗性育种值估计的影响。研究了三种不同的情况:基于系谱的模型(BLUP)、ssGBLUP以及带有元奠基者的ssGBLUP(ssGBLUPm)。在ssGBLUPm中,对于父母信息缺失的动物,总共纳入了基于起源品种(即赫里福德牛、布拉福德牛、瘤牛和未知品种)的四种不同元奠基者。元奠基者之间的相关系数平均为0.54(范围从0.34到0.96),这表明祖先群体之间存在重叠。元奠基者关系的估计表明,赫里福德牛和瘤牛品种可能存在共同的祖先关系。按照元奠基者方法计算的近交系数负值较小,这表明祖先群体足够大,并且从历史群体继承的配子并非完全相同。基于ssGBLUPm、ssGBLUP和BLUP估计了方差分量,但对ssGBLUPm的值进行了缩放,以便与其他两个模型的估计值进行公平比较。总体而言,在不同模型中,赫里福德牛群体的加性、残差和表型方差分量均小于布拉福德牛群体。基因组信息的加入提高了赫里福德牛群体的遗传力,这可能是由于遗传关系得到了改善。正如预期的那样,基因组模型具有更强的预测能力,与ssGBLUP相比,ssGBLUPm有额外的提升。赫里福德牛群体预测能力的提升更大。我们的结果表明,使用元奠基者有潜力提高基因组估计育种值的准确性,从而提高部分系谱信息缺失的肉牛群体的遗传进展速度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8f8/7793833/145bec6ccadd/fgene-11-556399-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Applying the Metafounders Approach for Genomic Evaluation in a Multibreed Beef Cattle Population.
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 3;11:556399. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.556399. eCollection 2020.
2
Metafounders May Reduce Bias in Composite Cattle Genomic Predictions.
Front Genet. 2021 Aug 20;12:678587. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.678587. eCollection 2021.
3
Invited review: Unknown-parent groups and metafounders in single-step genomic BLUP.
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Feb;105(2):923-939. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20293. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
4
Metafounders are related to F fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations.
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Mar 10;49(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0309-2.
5
Reliabilities of estimated breeding values in models with metafounders.
Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Jan 23;55(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00778-2.
7
Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Mar;102(3):2336-2346. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15434. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
Single-step genomic BLUP with many metafounders.
Front Genet. 2022 Nov 21;13:1012205. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1012205. eCollection 2022.
10
Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
J Appl Genet. 2018 Nov;59(4):493-501. doi: 10.1007/s13353-018-0470-5. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

2
Definition of metafounders based on population structure analysis.
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Jun 6;56(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00913-7.
3
Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP.
J Anim Breed Genet. 2025 Jan;142(1):43-56. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12882. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Confidence intervals for validation statistics with data truncation in genomic prediction.
Genet Sel Evol. 2024 Mar 8;56(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00883-w.
5
Selective genotyping to implement genomic selection in beef cattle breeding.
Front Genet. 2023 Mar 17;14:1083106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1083106. eCollection 2023.
6
Genomic evaluation for two-way crossbred performance in cattle.
Genet Sel Evol. 2023 Mar 17;55(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12711-023-00792-4.
7
Multi-breed genomic predictions and functional variants for fertility of tropical bulls.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0279398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279398. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

3
Modeling missing pedigree in single-step genomic BLUP.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Mar;102(3):2336-2346. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15434. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.
J Anim Sci. 2019 Feb 1;97(2):548-558. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky433.
6
Metafounders are related to F fixation indices and reduce bias in single-step genomic evaluations.
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Mar 10;49(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0309-2.
8
Comparing estimates of genetic variance across different relationship models.
Theor Popul Biol. 2016 Feb;107:26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
Ancestral Relationships Using Metafounders: Finite Ancestral Populations and Across Population Relationships.
Genetics. 2015 Jun;200(2):455-68. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.177014. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验