Suppr超能文献

从公平视角评估印度比哈尔邦的一项大规模生殖、孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康与营养方案。

Evaluation of a large-scale reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition program in Bihar, India, through an equity lens.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):021011. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.021011. Epub 2020 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite increasing focus on health inequities in low- and middle income countries, significant disparities persist. We analysed impacts of a statewide maternal and child health program among the most compared to the least marginalised women in Bihar, India.

METHODS

Utilising survey-weighted logistic regression, we estimated programmatic impact using difference-in-difference estimators from Mathematica data collected at the beginning (2012, n = 10 174) and after two years of program implementation (2014, n = 9611). We also examined changes in disparities over time using eight rounds of Community-based Household Surveys (CHS) (2012-2017, n = 48 349) collected by CARE India.

RESULTS

At baseline for the Mathematica data, least marginalised women generally performed desired health-related behaviours more frequently than the most marginalised. After two years, most disparities persisted. Disparities increased for skilled birth attendant identification [+16.2% (most marginalised) vs +32.6% (least marginalized),  < 0.01) and skin-to-skin care (+14.8% vs +20.4%,  < 0.05), and decreased for immediate breastfeeding (+10.4 vs -4.9,  < 0.01). For the CHS data, odds ratios compared the most to the least marginalised women as referent. Results demonstrated that disparities were most significant for indicators reliant on access to care such as delivery in a facility (OR range: 0.15 to 0.48) or by a qualified doctor (OR range: 0.08 to 0.25), and seeking care for complications (OR range: 0.26 to 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities observed at baseline generally persisted throughout program implementation. The most significant disparities were observed amongst behaviours dependent upon access to care. Changes in disparities largely were due to improvements for the least marginalised women without improvements for the most marginalised. Equity-based assessments of programmatic impacts, including those of universal health approaches, must be undertaken to monitor disparities and to ensure equitable and sustainable benefits for all.

STUDY REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02726230.

摘要

背景

尽管中低收入国家越来越关注健康不平等问题,但仍存在显著差距。我们分析了印度比哈尔邦一项州级母婴健康项目对最边缘化和最不边缘化妇女的影响。

方法

利用 Mathematica 数据进行调查加权逻辑回归,我们使用差异中的差异估计值从 2012 年(n=10174)和项目实施两年后的 2014 年(n=9611)进行了项目影响的估计。我们还利用 CARE 印度收集的八轮社区家庭调查(CHS)(2012-2017 年,n=48349)来研究随着时间的推移差异的变化。

结果

在 Mathematica 数据的基线时,最边缘化的妇女通常比最不边缘化的妇女更频繁地进行所需的与健康相关的行为。两年后,大多数差距仍然存在。熟练的接生员识别差距增加[最边缘化+16.2%(最边缘化)比最不边缘化+32.6%(最边缘化),<0.01]和皮肤接触护理[+14.8%对+20.4%,<0.05],立即母乳喂养减少[+10.4%对-4.9%,<0.01]。对于 CHS 数据,将最边缘化和最不边缘化的妇女作为参考比较了比值比。结果表明,对于依赖于获得医疗服务的指标,如在医疗机构分娩(比值比范围:0.15 至 0.48)或由合格医生分娩(比值比范围:0.08 至 0.25)或因并发症寻求医疗护理的指标(比值比范围:0.26 至 0.64),差异最为显著。

结论

在项目实施过程中,基线时观察到的差异普遍存在。最显著的差异发生在依赖于获得医疗服务的行为中。差异的变化主要是由于最不边缘化妇女的改善,而最边缘化妇女的改善不大。必须进行基于公平的方案影响评估,包括对全民健康方法的评估,以监测差距,并确保所有人群都能公平和可持续地受益。

研究注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 编号 NCT02726230。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f69f/7759017/37704a6eb6da/jogh-10-021011-F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验