Suppr超能文献

对印度采用保护性农业3年、6年和9年的农田土壤健康参数进行评估,并应用可持续性指数。

Assessment of soil health parameters and application of the sustainability index to fields under conservation agriculture for 3, 6, and 9 years in India.

作者信息

Bhattacharya Priya, Maity Pragati Pramanik, Mowrer Jake, Maity Aniruddha, Ray Mrinmoy, Das Shrila, Chakrabarti Bidisha, Ghosh Tridiv, Krishnan P

机构信息

ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa Campus, New Delhi 110012, India.

Department of Soil and Crop Sciences Texas A&M University, College Station TX 77843, USA.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2020 Dec 29;6(12):e05640. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05640. eCollection 2020 Dec.

Abstract

The effect of duration of conservation agriculture adoption on soil carbon dynamics and system sustainability was evaluated on farms of 30 villages in the Nilokheri block of Karnal district, Haryana, India. Sustainability was evaluated, in which a number of soil physical, chemical, and biological parameters were measured and a Sustainability Index (SI) was applied. Soil samples were collected from existing conservation agriculture (CA) and conventional tillage (CT) farms. Villages under CA practices were subdivided as CA3, CA6, and CA9 based on the number of years of CA practice adoption. Results showed that bulk density (BD) of 0-15 cm soil depth was 7% greater in CA3 plots, whereas in CA6 and CA9 plots BD values were only 2% and 3% higher than CT. Soil organic carbon (SOC) in 0-15 cm soil depth was found to be greater by 16.32% in CA3 than CT plots, whereas SOC was higher by 38.77% and 61.22% in CA6 and CA9. In CA, for the 0-15 and 15-30 cm soil depths, labile pools were 36% and 22% greater than CT, respectively. For both the soil depths in CA, the recalcitrant pool was 12% and 9% more than CT, respectively. Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) values of the 0-15 cm soil depth were increased over CT by 18.57%, 47.08%, and 71.5% for CA3, CA6, and CA9 respectively. In CA plots, the SI of 0-15 cm soil depth ranged between cumulative ratings (CR) of 18-21, which indicates that CA practice is "sustainable" for both soil depths. For CT, CR ranged from 25 to 30 for both soil depths resulting in a SI of "sustainability with high input". Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) scores showed that SOC had the maximum weight (0.96) towards sustainability, giving it a rank of 1. Effective rooting depth (ERD), BD, texture, and wilting point (WP) ranked 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively, indicating their corresponding weight of contribution towards the SI. Farmers in the Karnal district should be encouraged to adopt CA practices as they can increase SOC and move the systems from "sustainable with high input" to "sustainable".

摘要

在印度哈里亚纳邦卡纳尔区尼洛赫里街区的30个村庄的农场中,评估了采用保护性农业的持续时间对土壤碳动态和系统可持续性的影响。对可持续性进行了评估,测量了一些土壤物理、化学和生物学参数,并应用了可持续性指数(SI)。从现有的保护性农业(CA)和传统耕作(CT)农场采集土壤样本。根据采用CA实践的年数,将采用CA实践的村庄细分为CA3、CA6和CA9。结果表明,CA3地块0-15厘米土壤深度的容重(BD)比传统耕作地块高7%,而在CA6和CA9地块,BD值仅比传统耕作地块高2%和3%。发现CA3地块0-15厘米土壤深度的土壤有机碳(SOC)比传统耕作地块高16.32%,而CA6和CA9地块的SOC分别高38.77%和61.22%。在CA模式下,对于0-15厘米和15-30厘米的土壤深度,活性库分别比传统耕作大36%和22%。对于CA模式下的这两个土壤深度,难分解库分别比传统耕作多12%和9%。0-15厘米土壤深度的微生物生物量碳(MBC)值在CA3、CA6和CA9模式下分别比传统耕作增加了18.57%、47.08%和71.5%。在CA地块中,0-15厘米土壤深度的SI在累积评级(CR)为18-21之间,这表明CA实践对于两个土壤深度都是“可持续的”。对于传统耕作,两个土壤深度的CR范围为25至30,导致SI为“高投入可持续性”。逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)得分表明,SOC对可持续性的权重最大(0.96),排名第一。有效生根深度(ERD)、BD、质地和凋萎点(WP)分别排名2、3、4和5,表明它们对SI的相应贡献权重。应鼓励卡纳尔区的农民采用CA实践,因为这可以增加SOC,并使系统从“高投入可持续性”转变为“可持续性”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a0/7785834/b181bde8fc6c/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验