• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对牙医关于复合树脂粘结修复失败原因的观点评估]

[Assessment of dentists' opinions on the cause of failure of adhesive composite restorations].

作者信息

Körner Philipp, Wegehaupt Florian J, Attin Thomas

机构信息

Klinik für Zahnerhaltung und Präventivzahnmedizin, Zentrum für Zahnmedizin der Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.

出版信息

Swiss Dent J. 2021 Jan 11;131(1):45-52. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2021-01-03.

DOI:10.61872/sdj-2021-01-03
PMID:33427434
Abstract

Aim of this study was to get an overview of what dentists estimate to be the reason for failure of adhesive composite restorations and to gain knowledge about potential future foci for targeted further education. Therefore, a survey about the fabrication of composite restorations was conducted in the course of seven dental conferences with the main topic tooth-prevention. A total of 577 dentists participated in the survey. The most often called estimated factor for failure of composite restorations was the "dentist" (70.7%), followed by "indication" (32.2%), "material" (8.5%) and "patient" (8.1%). Participants estimated insufficient drying and fluid management (67.9%), incorrect application of the adhesive system (41.8%), insufficient lightpolymerisation (31.2%) and errors in incremental technique (27.6%) to be the main mistakes. The participating dentists claimed to attach great importance to careful drying and fluid management (60.8%), thorough adhesive application (37.3%), adequate incremental technique (32.6%) and sufficient lightpolymerisation (28.8%) while placing their own restorations. According to the survey participants, the treating dentist has the greatest influence on the quality and longevity of composite restorations. Drying and fluid management was the most often called estimated reason for failure but at the same time the step which is given the greatest caution.

摘要

本研究的目的是概述牙医认为复合树脂粘结修复失败的原因,并了解未来有针对性的继续教育的潜在重点。因此,在七个以牙齿预防为主题的牙科会议期间,开展了一项关于复合树脂修复体制作的调查。共有577名牙医参与了该调查。复合树脂修复失败最常被提及的估计因素是“牙医”(70.7%),其次是“适应证”(32.2%)、“材料”(8.5%)和“患者”(8.1%)。参与者认为干燥和液体管理不足(67.9%)、粘结系统应用不正确(41.8%)、光固化不足(31.2%)和分层技术错误(27.6%)是主要错误。参与调查的牙医声称,在进行自己的修复时,非常重视仔细的干燥和液体管理(60.8%)、彻底的粘结剂应用(37.3%)、适当的分层技术(32.6%)和足够的光固化(28.8%)。根据调查参与者的说法,治疗牙医对复合树脂修复的质量和寿命影响最大。干燥和液体管理是最常被提及的失败估计原因,但同时也是最谨慎对待的步骤。

相似文献

1
[Assessment of dentists' opinions on the cause of failure of adhesive composite restorations].[对牙医关于复合树脂粘结修复失败原因的观点评估]
Swiss Dent J. 2021 Jan 11;131(1):45-52. doi: 10.61872/sdj-2021-01-03.
2
The Post-Amalgam Era: Norwegian Dentists' Experiences with Composite Resins and Repair of Defective Amalgam Restorations.汞合金补牙材料使用后的时代:挪威牙医使用复合树脂补牙及修复汞合金补牙材料缺陷的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 22;13(4):441. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13040441.
3
Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway.修复有缺陷的复合修复体。挪威公共牙科服务牙医问卷调查研究。
J Dent. 2016 Sep;52:50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
4
Clinically used adhesive ceramic bonding methods: a survey in 2007, 2011, and in 2015.临床应用的陶瓷粘结方法:2007年、2011年及2015年的一项调查。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1691-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1684-0. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
5
Dentists' molar restoration choices and longevity: a web-based survey.牙医的磨牙修复选择与使用寿命:一项基于网络的调查。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Apr;91(4):363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.004.
6
Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.《牙体非龋性缺损的修复:基于牙体牙髓病临床诊疗病例的研究网络》。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Dec;142(12):1368-75. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0138.
7
From amalgam to composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland.从汞合金到复合树脂:芬兰修复材料的选择与修复体使用寿命
Acta Odontol Scand. 2001 Apr;59(2):57-62. doi: 10.1080/000163501750157090.
8
Repair versus replacement of defective direct restorations: A cross-sectional study among US dentists.修复与替换有缺陷的直接修复体:美国牙医的横断面研究。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2021 Nov;152(11):927-935. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
9
Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.牙医的修复决策及其对“无汞合金”行业的影响。第4部分:临床因素。
Aust Dent J. 2017 Sep;62(3):363-371. doi: 10.1111/adj.12519. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
10
Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.英国后牙树脂复合材料修复体下衬层材料的使用情况
J Dent. 2017 Feb;57:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 14.