• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定标准指标以评估中低收入国家实施的电子健康记录系统的使用情况。

Development of standard indicators to assess use of electronic health record systems implemented in low-and medium-income countries.

机构信息

Department of Information Science and Media studies, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0244917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244917. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0244917
PMID:33428656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7799790/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic Health Record Systems (EHRs) are being rolled out nationally in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) yet assessing actual system usage remains a challenge. We employed a nominal group technique (NGT) process to systematically develop high-quality indicators for evaluating actual usage of EHRs in LMICs.

METHODS

An initial set of 14 candidate indicators were developed by the study team adapting the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Monitoring, Evaluation, and Reporting indicators format. A multidisciplinary team of 10 experts was convened in a two-day NGT workshop in Kenya to systematically evaluate, rate (using Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-Bound (SMART) criteria), prioritize, refine, and identify new indicators. NGT steps included introduction to candidate indicators, silent indicator ranking, round-robin indicator rating, and silent generation of new indicators. 5-point Likert scale was used in rating the candidate indicators against the SMART components.

RESULTS

Candidate indicators were rated highly on SMART criteria (4.05/5). NGT participants settled on 15 final indicators, categorized as system use (4); data quality (3), system interoperability (3), and reporting (5). Data entry statistics, systems uptime, and EHRs variable concordance indicators were rated highest.

CONCLUSION

This study describes a systematic approach to develop and validate quality indicators for determining EHRs use and provides LMICs with a multidimensional tool for assessing success of EHRs implementations.

摘要

背景

电子健康记录系统(EHRs)正在许多低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)全面推广,但评估实际系统使用情况仍然是一个挑战。我们采用名义群体技术(NGT)流程,系统地开发了高质量的指标,用于评估 LMICs 中 EHR 的实际使用情况。

方法

研究小组通过改编人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)监测、评估和报告指标格式,制定了一套 14 项候选指标。一个由 10 名专家组成的多学科团队在肯尼亚举行了为期两天的 NGT 研讨会,系统地评估、评级(使用具体、可衡量、可实现、相关和有时限(SMART)标准)、优先排序、细化和确定新的指标。NGT 步骤包括介绍候选指标、静默指标排名、循环指标评分和静默生成新指标。使用 5 点李克特量表对候选指标进行 SMART 成分评分。

结果

候选指标在 SMART 标准上的评分很高(4.05/5)。NGT 参与者最终确定了 15 项最终指标,分为系统使用(4)、数据质量(3)、系统互操作性(3)和报告(5)。数据录入统计、系统正常运行时间和 EHR 变量一致性指标的评分最高。

结论

本研究描述了一种开发和验证用于确定 EHR 使用情况的质量指标的系统方法,并为 LMICs 提供了一个多维工具,用于评估 EHR 实施的成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a1/7799790/a1ca3b4317af/pone.0244917.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a1/7799790/a1ca3b4317af/pone.0244917.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2a1/7799790/a1ca3b4317af/pone.0244917.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of standard indicators to assess use of electronic health record systems implemented in low-and medium-income countries.制定标准指标以评估中低收入国家实施的电子健康记录系统的使用情况。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 11;16(1):e0244917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244917. eCollection 2021.
2
A multivariate statistical evaluation of actual use of electronic health record systems implementations in Kenya.肯尼亚电子健康记录系统实际使用情况的多变量统计评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256799. eCollection 2021.
3
Research evidence on strategies enabling integration of electronic health records in the health care systems of low- and middle-income countries: A literature review.研究证据表明,在中低收入国家的医疗体系中实现电子健康记录整合的策略:文献综述。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Apr;34(2):e1016-e1025. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2754. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
Barriers, Priorities and Lessons Learned in Achieving Electronic Health Records Interoperability in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Workshop Findings.中低收入国家实现电子健康记录互操作性的障碍、优先事项和经验教训:研讨会成果。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:388-389. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230154.
5
Identification and Prioritization of Quality Indicators for Conservative Kidney Management.保守性肾脏管理质量指标的识别和优先级排序。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Feb;73(2):174-183. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
How Appropriate Is All This Data Sharing? Building Consensus Around What We Need to Know About Shared Electronic Health Records in Extended Circles of Care.所有这些数据共享有多恰当?围绕我们在扩大的照护圈子中需要了解的共享电子健康记录达成共识。
Healthc Q. 2017;19(4):28-36. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2016.24902.
7
A national standards-based assessment on functionality of electronic medical records systems used in Kenyan public-Sector health facilities.一项基于国家标准对肯尼亚公共部门医疗机构所使用的电子病历系统功能的评估。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.09.013. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
8
Quality Requirements for Electronic Health Record Systems*. A Japanese-German Information Management Perspective.电子健康记录系统的质量要求*。日德信息管理视角
Methods Inf Med. 2017 Aug 7;56(7):e92-e104. doi: 10.3414/ME17-05-0002.
9
Development of a checklist of quality indicators for clinical trials in resource-limited countries: the French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis (ANRS) experience.在资源有限国家临床试验质量指标清单的制定:法国国家艾滋病和病毒性肝炎研究署(ANRS)的经验。
Clin Trials. 2013 Apr;10(2):300-18. doi: 10.1177/1740774512470765. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
10
Developing a National-Level Concept Dictionary for EHR Implementations in Kenya.为肯尼亚电子健康记录系统实施开发国家级概念词典。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:780-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health capacity and pediatric care quality in LMICs: A large-scale analysis of 5311 health facilities.低收入和中等收入国家的数字健康能力与儿科护理质量:对5311个医疗机构的大规模分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 11;11:20552076251349890. doi: 10.1177/20552076251349890. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Assessing the Digital Advancement of Public Health Systems Using Indicators Published in Gray Literature: Narrative Review.利用灰色文献中发布的指标评估公共卫生系统的数字化进展:叙述性综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Nov 20;10:e63031. doi: 10.2196/63031.
3
Electronic health records model to improve the quality of patients' healthcare.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of HIV Data Reporting Performance by Facilities During EMR Systems Implementations in Kenya.肯尼亚电子病历系统实施期间医疗机构的艾滋病毒数据报告绩效评估
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 26;272:167-170. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200520.
2
Facilitators and Barriers of Electronic Medical Records Systems Implementation in Low Resource Settings: A Holistic View.资源匮乏环境下电子病历系统实施的促进因素与障碍:整体视角
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;251:187-190.
3
Why sub-Saharan Africa lags in electronic health record adoption and possible strategies to increase its adoption in this region.
用于提高患者医疗保健质量的电子健康记录模型。
Health SA. 2024 Sep 17;29:2414. doi: 10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2414. eCollection 2024.
4
Key Indicators for Monitoring the Efficiency of Iranian Health System: A Synthesized Design Study.监测伊朗卫生系统效率的关键指标:一项综合设计研究。
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Mar;53(3):704-713. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i3.15152.
5
Field based research in the era of the pandemic in resource limited settings: challenges and lessons for the future.资源有限环境下大流行时代的实地研究:未来的挑战与经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;12:1309089. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1309089. eCollection 2024.
6
Electronic health record and primary care physician self-reported quality of care: a multilevel study in China.电子健康记录和初级保健医生自我报告的医疗质量:中国的一项多层次研究。
Glob Health Action. 2024 Dec 31;17(1):2301195. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2301195. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
7
Users' perception on factors contributing to electronic medical records systems use: a focus group discussion study in healthcare facilities setting in Kenya.用户对电子病历系统使用因素的认知:肯尼亚医疗机构的焦点小组讨论研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Dec 26;21(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01737-x.
8
A multivariate statistical evaluation of actual use of electronic health record systems implementations in Kenya.肯尼亚电子健康记录系统实际使用情况的多变量统计评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 7;16(9):e0256799. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256799. eCollection 2021.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区在采用电子健康记录方面滞后的原因以及提高该地区电子健康记录采用率的可能策略。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Sep-Oct;11(4):59-64.
4
Health information systems evaluation frameworks: A systematic review.健康信息系统评估框架:一项系统综述。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
5
Benefits and challenges of EMR implementations in low resource settings: a state-of-the-art review.资源匮乏地区电子病历实施的益处与挑战:最新综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Sep 6;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0354-8.
6
Opportunities and challenges for implementing cost accounting systems in the Kenyan health system.肯尼亚卫生系统实施成本核算制度的机遇与挑战。
Glob Health Action. 2016 Jun 28;9:30621. doi: 10.3402/gha.v9.30621. eCollection 2016.
7
Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?曼尼托巴省电子病历的数据质量:问题清单能否准确反映慢性病计费诊断?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1107-1112. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw013. Epub 2016 Apr 23.
8
Assessing the impact of a primary care electronic medical record system in three Kenyan rural health centers.评估肯尼亚三个农村医疗中心的基层医疗电子病历系统的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):544-52. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv074. Epub 2015 Aug 9.
9
Barriers to using eHealth data for clinical performance feedback in Malawi: A case study.马拉维将电子健康数据用于临床绩效反馈的障碍:一项案例研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):868-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 19.
10
Use of Electronic Health Records in sub-Saharan Africa: Progress and challenges.撒哈拉以南非洲地区电子健康记录的使用:进展与挑战
J Med Trop. 2012;14(1):1-6.