• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择性育种如何改变了美国水貂的形态——农场动物与野生水貂的比较分析

How Selective Breeding Has Changed the Morphology of the American Mink ()-A Comparative Analysis of Farm and Feral Animals.

作者信息

Mucha Anna, Zatoń-Dobrowolska Magdalena, Moska Magdalena, Wierzbicki Heliodor, Dziech Arkadiusz, Bukaciński Dariusz, Bukacińska Monika

机构信息

Department of Genetics, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 51-631 Wrocław, Poland.

Institute of Biological Sciences, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, 01-938 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 7;11(1):106. doi: 10.3390/ani11010106.

DOI:10.3390/ani11010106
PMID:33430282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7825718/
Abstract

In this study, we performed a comparative analysis of the morphological traits between feral ( = 43) and farm ( = 200) individuals of the American mink in Poland to address the question of how multigenerational intensive selective breeding has morphologically differentiated these two populations. Nine body measurements and two proportion coefficients were obtained using adult individuals. The significance of differences between population means was assessed using the Wilcoxon test for independent samples, while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare sex-population groups. Spearman's correlation coefficients between measurements were estimated for each population. We also performed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to identify the variables that were most closely correlated with variation in the trait measurements and to investigate the morphological differences between farm and feral minks. We found that the farm minks exhibited significantly higher mean values for eight out of eleven studied traits. Moreover, significant changes in forelimb length, with no concomitant changes in hindlimb length, were accompanied by differences in body shape: trapezoidal in feral minks and rectangular in farm minks. The PCA suggested an almost complete separation of the two populations and indicated that sexes were quite separate; farm males in particular constitute a wholly discrete cluster. Such a clear differentiation between the two populations and sexes over a period of several decades highlights the intensity of selective breeding in shaping the morphology of these animals.

摘要

在本研究中,我们对波兰美洲水貂的野生个体(n = 43)和养殖个体(n = 200)的形态特征进行了比较分析,以解决多代密集选择育种如何在形态上使这两个种群产生差异的问题。使用成年个体获取了九项身体测量数据和两项比例系数。使用独立样本的Wilcoxon检验评估种群均值之间差异的显著性,而Kruskal-Wallis检验用于比较性别 - 种群组。估计了每个种群测量值之间的Spearman相关系数。我们还进行了主成分分析(PCA),以确定与性状测量变化最密切相关的变量,并研究养殖水貂和野生水貂之间的形态差异。我们发现,在所研究的11个性状中,养殖水貂有8个的均值显著更高。此外,前肢长度的显著变化,后肢长度没有相应变化,伴随着身体形状的差异:野生水貂呈梯形,养殖水貂呈长方形。主成分分析表明这两个种群几乎完全分离,并且表明性别也相当分开;特别是养殖雄性水貂构成了一个完全离散的集群。在几十年的时间里,这两个种群和性别之间如此明显的分化突出了选择育种在塑造这些动物形态方面的强度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7825718/ced86222a5b8/animals-11-00106-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7825718/164659ecfbac/animals-11-00106-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7825718/ced86222a5b8/animals-11-00106-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7825718/164659ecfbac/animals-11-00106-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f19/7825718/ced86222a5b8/animals-11-00106-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How Selective Breeding Has Changed the Morphology of the American Mink ()-A Comparative Analysis of Farm and Feral Animals.选择性育种如何改变了美国水貂的形态——农场动物与野生水貂的比较分析
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 7;11(1):106. doi: 10.3390/ani11010106.
2
Population genetic structure in farm and feral American mink (Neovison vison) inferred from RAD sequencing-generated single nucleotide polymorphisms.基于RAD测序产生的单核苷酸多态性推断养殖和野生美洲水貂(Neovison vison)的群体遗传结构。
J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;93(8):3773-82. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-8996.
3
Methods for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink (Neovison vison) populations.在野生水貂(Neovison vison)种群中识别农场逃逸个体的方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 11;14(11):e0224559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224559. eCollection 2019.
4
Food transit time, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention in farmed and feral American mink (Neovison vison)--a comparative analysis.养殖和野生美洲水貂(Neovison vison)的食物通过时间、营养消化率和氮保留的比较分析。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Dec;97(6):1030-5. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12006. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
5
High Genetic Diversity of an Invasive Alien Species: Comparison between Fur-Farmed and Feral American Mink () in China.一种入侵外来物种的高遗传多样性:中国人工养殖与野生美洲水貂()的比较。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 10;11(2):472. doi: 10.3390/ani11020472.
6
Population viability analysis of American mink (Neovison vison) escaped from Danish mink farms.丹麦养殖场逃逸的美洲水貂(Neovison vison)的种群生存力分析。
J Anim Sci. 2013 Jun;91(6):2530-41. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-6039. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
7
PREVALENCE OF ANTIBODY TO ALEUTIAN MINK DISEASE VIRUS IN EUROPEAN MINK (MUSTELA LUTREOLA) AND AMERICAN MINK (NEOVISON VISON) IN SPAIN.西班牙欧洲水貂(Mustela lutreola)和美洲水貂(Neovison vison)中阿留申水貂病病毒抗体的流行情况
J Wildl Dis. 2016 Jan;52(1):22-32. doi: 10.7589/2015-04-082. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
[Odontologic anomaly in the American mink Neovison vison (Carnivora, Mustelidae) and possible reasons for its appearance].
Ontogenez. 2013 Nov-Dec;44(6):417-22.
9
Comparison of hepatic and nephric total mercury concentrations between feral and ranch American mink (Neovison vison) from northwestern Poland.比较来自波兰西北部的野生和牧场养殖的美洲水貂(Neovison vison)的肝和肾中的总汞浓度。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2012 May;88(5):802-6. doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0555-5. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
10
The possible impact of escaped captive American mink (Neogale vison) on the population of feral mink in Denmark.逃笼的圈养美洲水貂(Neogale vison)对丹麦野生水貂种群的可能影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 30;18(11):e0292609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292609. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID mink analysis shows mutations are not dangerous - yet.新冠病毒水貂分析表明,目前这些突变尚无危险。
Nature. 2020 Nov;587(7834):340-341. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03218-z.
2
The History of Farm Foxes Undermines the Animal Domestication Syndrome.农场狐狸的历史破坏了动物驯化综合征。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb;35(2):125-136. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.011. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
Methods for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink (Neovison vison) populations.在野生水貂(Neovison vison)种群中识别农场逃逸个体的方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 11;14(11):e0224559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224559. eCollection 2019.
4
SNP markers associated with body size and pelt length in American mink (Neovison vison).与美国水貂(Neovison vison)体型和皮张长度相关的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)标记
BMC Genet. 2018 Nov 12;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12863-018-0688-6.
5
DON-induced Changes in Bone Homeostasis in Mink Dams.呕吐毒素诱导的水貂母兽骨稳态变化。
J Vet Res. 2017 Sep 19;61(3):357-362. doi: 10.1515/jvetres-2017-0047. eCollection 2017 Sep.
6
Effects of maternal treatment with β-hydroxy-β-metylbutyrate and 2-oxoglutaric acid on femur development in offspring of minks of the standard dark brown type.母体用β-羟基-β-甲基丁酸和2-氧代戊二酸处理对标准深褐色水貂后代股骨发育的影响。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2018 Feb;102(1):e299-e308. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12742. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Genetic parameters for fur quality graded on live animals and dried pelts of American mink (Neovison vison).基于活体动物和美国水貂(Neovison vison)干皮的毛皮质量遗传参数。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2017 Aug;134(4):322-331. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12258. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
8
Population genetic structure in farm and feral American mink (Neovison vison) inferred from RAD sequencing-generated single nucleotide polymorphisms.基于RAD测序产生的单核苷酸多态性推断养殖和野生美洲水貂(Neovison vison)的群体遗传结构。
J Anim Sci. 2015 Aug;93(8):3773-82. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-8996.
9
Food transit time, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention in farmed and feral American mink (Neovison vison)--a comparative analysis.养殖和野生美洲水貂(Neovison vison)的食物通过时间、营养消化率和氮保留的比较分析。
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Dec;97(6):1030-5. doi: 10.1111/jpn.12006. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
10
Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how?针对多重检验进行校正——何时以及如何校正?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;54(4):343-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00314-0.