National Clinician Scholars Program, University of California, Los Angeles (S.N.).
Department of Emergency Medicine. Los Angeles, CA (S.N.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 Jan;14(1):e006297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006297. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
Wide variation exists for hospital admission rates for the evaluation of possible acute coronary syndrome, but there are limited data on physician-level variation. Our aim is to describe physicians' rates of admission for suspected acute coronary syndrome and associated 30-day major adverse events.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult emergency department chest pain encounters from January 2016 to December 2017 across 15 community emergency departments within an integrated health system in Southern California. The unit of analysis was the Emergency physician. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted/observed in the hospital. Secondary analysis described the 30-day incidence of death or acute myocardial infarction.
Thirty-eight thousand seven hundred seventy-eight patients encounters were included among 327 managing physicians. The median number of encounters per physician was 123 (interquartile range, 82-157) with an overall admission/observation rate of 14.0%. Wide variation in individual physician admission rates were observed (unadjusted, 1.5%-68.9%) and persisted after case-mix adjustments (adjusted, 5.5%-27.8%). More clinical experience was associated with a higher likelihood of hospital care. There was no difference in 30-day death or acute myocardial infarction between high- and low-admitting physician quartiles (unadjusted, 1.70% versus 0.82% and adjusted, 1.33% versus 1.29%).
Wide variation persists in physician-level admission rates for emergency department chest pain evaluation, even in a well-integrated health system. There was no associated benefit in 30-day death or acute myocardial infarction for patients evaluated by high-admitting physicians. This suggests an additional opportunity to investigate the safe reduction of physician-level variation in the use of hospital care.
评估疑似急性冠状动脉综合征时,医院收治率存在很大差异,但关于医师层面差异的数据有限。我们的目的是描述医师对疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的收治率及其与 30 天主要不良事件的关系。
我们对 2016 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间南加州一个综合医疗系统内的 15 个社区急诊部的成年急诊胸痛就诊进行了回顾性分析。分析单元为急诊医师。主要结局是患者住院/观察的比例。次要分析描述了 30 天内死亡或急性心肌梗死的发生率。
在 327 名主治医生中,共纳入 3778 名患者。每位医生的平均就诊数为 123(四分位距,82-157),整体住院/观察率为 14.0%。观察到个体医师收治率差异很大(未经调整的,1.5%-68.9%),且在病例组合调整后仍持续存在(调整后的,5.5%-27.8%)。更多的临床经验与更高的住院治疗可能性相关。高收治医生和低收治医生的 30 天内死亡或急性心肌梗死发生率无差异(未经调整的,1.70%比 0.82%和调整后的,1.33%比 1.29%)。
即使在一个整合良好的医疗系统中,急诊胸痛评估的医师层面收治率仍存在很大差异。对高收治医生评估的患者,30 天内死亡或急性心肌梗死无相关获益。这表明有机会进一步研究安全减少医生层面在使用医院治疗方面的差异。