• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与大型初级保健实践为基础的儿科队列研究参与相关的因素:来自 TARGet Kids!纵向队列研究的结果。

Factors associated with research participation in a large primary care practice-based pediatric cohort: Results from the TARGet Kids! longitudinal cohort study.

机构信息

Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Apr 11;18(4):e0284192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284192. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0284192
PMID:37040376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10089319/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

All longitudinal cohort studies strive for high participant retention, although attrition is common. Understanding determinants of attrition is important to inform and develop targeted strategies to improve study participation. We aimed to identify factors associated with research participation in a large children's primary care cohort study.

METHODS

In this longitudinal cohort study between 2008 and 2020, all children who participated in the Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGet Kids!) were included. TARGet Kids! is a large primary care practice-based pediatric research network in Canada with ongoing data collection at well-child visits. Several sociodemographic, health, and study design factors were examined for their associations with research participation. The primary outcome was attendance of eligible research follow-up visits. The secondary outcome was time to withdrawal from the TARGet Kids! study. Generalized linear mixed effects models and Cox proportional hazard models were fitted. We have engaged parent partners in all stages of this study.

RESULTS

A total 10,412 children with 62,655 total eligible research follow-up visits were included. Mean age at enrolment was 22 months, 52% were male, and 52% had mothers of European ethnicity. 68.4% of the participants attended at least 1 research follow-up visit. Since 2008, 6.4% of the participants have submitted a withdrawal request. Key factors associated with research participation included child age, ethnicity, maternal age, maternal education level, family income, parental employment, child diagnosis of chronic health conditions, certain study sites, and missingness in questionnaire data.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic status, demographic factors, chronic conditions, and missingness in questionnaire data were associated with research participation in this large primary care practice-based cohort study of children. Results from this analysis and input from our parent partners suggested that retention strategies could include continued parent engagement, creating brand identity and communication tools, using multiple languages and avoiding redundancy in the questionnaires.

摘要

背景

所有纵向队列研究都努力实现高参与者保留率,尽管失访很常见。了解失访的决定因素对于提供信息和制定有针对性的策略以提高研究参与度很重要。我们旨在确定与大型儿童初级保健队列研究中研究参与相关的因素。

方法

在这项 2008 年至 2020 年期间进行的纵向队列研究中,纳入了所有参加应用研究小组(TARGet Kids!)的儿童。TARGet Kids!是加拿大一个大型的基于初级保健的儿科研究网络,在定期的儿童健康检查中进行持续的数据收集。检查了几个社会人口统计学、健康和研究设计因素与研究参与的关联。主要结果是参加合格的研究随访。次要结果是从 TARGet Kids!研究中退出的时间。拟合了广义线性混合效应模型和 Cox 比例风险模型。我们已经让家长合作伙伴参与了这项研究的所有阶段。

结果

共纳入 10412 名儿童,共有 62655 次合格的研究随访。入组时的平均年龄为 22 个月,52%为男性,52%的母亲为欧洲裔。68.4%的参与者至少参加了一次研究随访。自 2008 年以来,6.4%的参与者已提交退出请求。与研究参与相关的关键因素包括儿童年龄、种族、母亲年龄、母亲教育程度、家庭收入、父母就业、儿童慢性健康状况诊断、某些研究地点以及问卷数据缺失。

结论

社会经济地位、人口统计学因素、慢性疾病和问卷数据缺失与这项针对儿童的大型初级保健实践队列研究中的研究参与相关。这项分析的结果和我们家长合作伙伴的意见表明,保留策略可以包括继续与家长保持联系、建立品牌形象和沟通工具、使用多种语言和避免问卷重复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ad/10089319/d4408f23bd15/pone.0284192.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ad/10089319/d4408f23bd15/pone.0284192.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ad/10089319/d4408f23bd15/pone.0284192.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with research participation in a large primary care practice-based pediatric cohort: Results from the TARGet Kids! longitudinal cohort study.与大型初级保健实践为基础的儿科队列研究参与相关的因素:来自 TARGet Kids!纵向队列研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 11;18(4):e0284192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284192. eCollection 2023.
2
Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers.为家长赋权创造机会:该项目对危重症幼儿及其母亲心理健康/应对结果的影响。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e597-607. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e597.
3
Parent-mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome.家长介导的干预措施对促进唐氏综合征幼儿的沟通和语言发展的作用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 15;10(10):CD012089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012089.pub2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Factors of non-responsive or lost-to-follow-up Japanese mothers during the first year post partum following the Japan Environment and Children's Study: a longitudinal cohort study.日本环境与儿童研究中产后第一年无反应或失访的日本母亲的相关因素:一项纵向队列研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 12;9(11):e031222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031222.
6
From concept to application: the impact of a community-wide intervention to improve the delivery of preventive services to children.从概念到应用:一项全社区干预措施对改善儿童预防性服务提供情况的影响。
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):E42. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.3.e42.
7
Supporting Parents & Kids Through Lockdown Experiences (SPARKLE): A digital parenting support app implemented in an ongoing general population cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.支持父母和孩子度过封锁期(SPARKLE):在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在一项正在进行的一般人群队列研究中实施的数字育儿支持应用程序:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 10;22(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05226-4.
8
Forming a Parent And Clinician Team (PACT) in a cohort of healthy children.在一群健康儿童中组建家长与临床医生团队(PACT)。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 27;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00293-y.
9
Factors associated with participation over time in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: a study using linked education and primary care data.与参与阿冯纵向研究的父母和孩子的时间有关的因素:一项使用链接教育和初级保健数据的研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar 3;50(1):293-302. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa192.
10
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Recruitment and retention strategies to promote research engagement among caregivers and their children: A scoping review.促进照顾者及其子女参与研究的招募和保留策略:一项范围综述。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 8;8(1):e194. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.624. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination in young children.与幼儿 COVID-19 疫苗接种相关的因素。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Feb;115(1):40-52. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00817-x. Epub 2023 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media Use for Research Participant Recruitment: Integrative Literature Review.社交媒体在研究参与者招募中的应用:综合文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 4;24(8):e38015. doi: 10.2196/38015.
2
The Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) longitudinal study: cohort profile and key findings from the first three years.阿尔伯塔妊娠结局与营养 (APrON) 纵向研究:前三年的队列特征和主要发现。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 7;12(2):e047503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047503.
3
Forming a Parent And Clinician Team (PACT) in a cohort of healthy children.
在一群健康儿童中组建家长与临床医生团队(PACT)。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 27;7(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00293-y.
4
Parent engagement in co-design of clinical trials: the PARENT trial.家长参与临床试验的共同设计:PARENT 试验。
Trials. 2021 May 17;22(1):347. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05305-6.
5
Completeness of Retention Data and Determinants of Attrition in Birth Cohorts of Very Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.极早产儿出生队列中保留数据的完整性及失访的决定因素:一项系统综述
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 17;9:529733. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.529733. eCollection 2021.
6
Determinants of attrition in a pediatric healthy lifestyle intervention: The CIRCUIT program experience.儿科健康生活方式干预中脱落的决定因素:CIRCUIT 项目经验。
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2021 Mar-Apr;15(2):157-162. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2021.01.007. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
7
Family perspectives of COVID-19 research.新冠病毒疾病研究的家庭视角
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Nov 30;6(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00242-1.
8
Cohort Profile: Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development (QLSCD).队列简介:魁北克儿童发展纵向研究(QLSCD)。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 May;56(5):883-894. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01972-z. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
9
Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and overweight/obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.邻里社会经济地位与超重/肥胖:流行病学研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e028238. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028238.
10
Participant retention in follow-up studies of prematurely born children.早产儿随访研究中的参与者保留率。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):1233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7575-6.