• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新鲜农产品激励措施与烹饪和营养教育相结合对低收入家庭健康饮食的影响:一项试点研究。

The effect of a fresh produce incentive paired with cooking and nutrition education on healthy eating in low-income households: a pilot study.

机构信息

Humphrey School of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, 301 19th Ave. S., Minneapolis, MN55455, USA.

Centre for Global Health Research, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2704-2714. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000094. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1017/S1368980021000094
PMID:33431079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10195625/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study pilot-tested combining financial incentives to purchase fruits and vegetables with nutrition education focused on cooking to increase the consumption of fruits and vegetables and improve attitudes around healthy eating on a budget among low-income adults. The goal of the pilot study was to examine implementation feasibility and fidelity, acceptability of the intervention components by participants and effectiveness.

DESIGN

The study design was a pre-post individual-level comparison without a control group. The pilot intervention included two components, a scan card providing free produce up to a weekly maximum dollar amount for use over a 2-month period, and two sessions of tailored nutrition and cooking education. Outcomes included self-reported attitudes about healthy eating and daily fruit and vegetable consumption from one 24-h dietary recall collected before and after the intervention.

SETTING

Greater Minneapolis/St. Paul area in Minnesota.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (n 120) were recruited from five community food pantries.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that the financial incentive component of the intervention was highly feasible and acceptable to participants, but attendance at the nutrition education sessions was moderate. Participants had a statistically significant increase in the consumption of fruit, from an average of 1·00 cup/d to 1·78 cups/d (P < 0·001), but no significant change in vegetable consumption or attitudes with respect to their ability to put together a healthy meal.

CONCLUSIONS

While combining financial incentives with nutrition education appears to be acceptable to low-income adult participants, barriers to attend nutrition education sessions need to be addressed in future research.

摘要

目的

本研究初步测试了将购买水果和蔬菜的经济激励措施与以烹饪为重点的营养教育相结合,以增加低收入成年人对水果和蔬菜的消费,并改善其在预算范围内健康饮食的态度。该试点研究的目标是检验实施的可行性和保真度、参与者对干预措施各组成部分的接受程度以及干预的效果。

设计

该研究设计为个体水平的预-后比较,没有对照组。该试点干预包括两个组成部分,一是提供免费农产品的扫描卡,每周最多可使用一定金额,为期两个月;二是两期定制的营养和烹饪教育。结果包括通过干预前后各一次 24 小时膳食回顾收集的关于健康饮食态度和每日水果及蔬菜摄入量的自我报告。

地点

明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯/圣保罗大都市区。

参与者

从五个社区食品储藏室招募了 120 名成年人。

结果

研究结果表明,干预措施的经济激励部分对参与者来说是高度可行和可接受的,但营养教育课程的出勤率中等。参与者的水果摄入量有统计学意义的增加,从平均 1.00 杯/天增加到 1.78 杯/天(P<0.001),但蔬菜摄入量或其组合健康膳食的能力方面没有显著变化。

结论

虽然将经济激励与营养教育相结合对低收入成年参与者来说是可以接受的,但未来的研究需要解决参加营养教育课程的障碍。

相似文献

1
The effect of a fresh produce incentive paired with cooking and nutrition education on healthy eating in low-income households: a pilot study.新鲜农产品激励措施与烹饪和营养教育相结合对低收入家庭健康饮食的影响:一项试点研究。
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Jun;24(9):2704-2714. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021000094. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
2
Financial Incentives Increase Purchases Of Fruit And Vegetables Among Lower-Income Households With Children.经济激励措施增加了有孩子的低收入家庭购买水果和蔬菜的数量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1557-1566. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05420.
3
Financial incentives increase fruit and vegetable intake among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participants: a randomized controlled trial of the USDA Healthy Incentives Pilot.经济激励措施可增加补充营养援助计划参与者的果蔬摄入量:美国农业部健康激励试点项目的一项随机对照试验
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;104(2):423-35. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.129320. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
4
The use of financial incentives to increase fresh fruit and vegetable purchases in lower-income households: results of a pilot study.利用经济激励措施增加低收入家庭新鲜水果和蔬菜的购买量:一项试点研究的结果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 May;24(2):864-74. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0064.
5
Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption and offerings to Somali children: the FAV-S pilot study.增加索马里儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量及供应:FAV-S试点研究
J Prim Care Community Health. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):139-43. doi: 10.1177/2150131913513269. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
6
Qualitative Study on Participant Perceptions of a Supermarket Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Program.关于参与者对超市水果和蔬菜激励计划看法的定性研究。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Aug;121(8):1497-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
A Supermarket Double-Dollar Incentive Program Increases Purchases of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Families With Children: The Healthy Double Study.超级市场双倍优惠激励计划增加有孩子的低收入家庭购买新鲜水果和蔬菜:健康双研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):217-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Cluster randomized controlled trial of a mobile market intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake among adults in lower-income communities in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州低收入社区成年人中通过移动市场干预增加水果和蔬菜摄入量的整群随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jan 5;15(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0637-1.
9
Community supported agriculture plus nutrition education improves skills, self-efficacy, and eating behaviors among low-income caregivers but not their children: a randomized controlled trial.社区支持农业加营养教育可提高低收入照顾者的技能、自我效能和饮食行为,但对其子女没有影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Aug 31;18(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01168-x.
10
Community-based culinary and nutrition education intervention promotes fruit and vegetable consumption.基于社区的烹饪和营养教育干预促进了水果和蔬菜的消费。
Public Health Nutr. 2022 Feb;25(2):437-449. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021003797. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
An environmental scan of financial incentives to increase access to healthy foods: How, how much, and how often?增加健康食品可及性的经济激励措施的环境扫描:方式、金额及频率如何?
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 19;25(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21855-9.
2
Impact of Fruit and Vegetable Incentive Programs on Food Insecurity, Fruit and Vegetable Consumption, and Health Outcomes: A Community Guide Systematic Review.水果和蔬菜激励计划对粮食不安全、水果和蔬菜消费及健康结果的影响:《社区指南》系统评价
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Mar;68(3):627-637. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2024.11.016. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Community-based fruit and vegetable prescription programs: a scoping review.社区水果和蔬菜处方项目:范围综述。
J Nutr Sci. 2023 Sep 15;12:e99. doi: 10.1017/jns.2023.81. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluating Moderation of Parent-Teen Overweight/Obesity Relation by Household Socioeconomic Status.评估家庭社会经济地位对父母与青少年超重/肥胖关系的调节作用。
Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Apr 12;5(4):nzab030. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab030. eCollection 2021 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring barriers to meeting recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake among adults in regional areas: A mixed-methods analysis of variations across socio-demographics.探讨区域成年人满足水果和蔬菜摄入量建议的障碍:基于社会人口统计学差异的混合方法分析。
Appetite. 2020 Oct 1;153:104750. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104750. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
Evaluating A USDA Program That Gives SNAP Participants Financial Incentives To Buy Fresh Produce In Supermarkets.评估美国农业部的一个计划,该计划向 SNAP 参与者提供在超市购买新鲜农产品的经济激励。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Nov;38(11):1816-1823. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00431.
3
Financial Incentives Increase Purchases Of Fruit And Vegetables Among Lower-Income Households With Children.经济激励措施增加了有孩子的低收入家庭购买水果和蔬菜的数量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Sep;38(9):1557-1566. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05420.
4
Compared to Pre-prepared Meals, Fully and Partly Home-Cooked Meals in Diverse Families with Young Children Are More Likely to Include Nutritious Ingredients.与预制餐相比,有年幼子女的多元化家庭的完全和部分自制餐更有可能包含营养成分。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 May;119(5):818-830. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
5
Comparing Reported Dietary Supplement Intakes between Two 24-Hour Recall Methods: The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool and the Interview-Administered Automated Multiple Pass Method.比较两种 24 小时回顾法报告的膳食补充剂摄入量:自动自我管理 24 小时膳食评估工具和访谈管理自动化多次通过法。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Jun;118(6):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.02.013.
6
Who's cooking? Trends in US home food preparation by gender, education, and race/ethnicity from 2003 to 2016.谁在做饭?2003 年至 2016 年美国按性别、教育程度和种族/族裔划分的家庭食品准备趋势。
Nutr J. 2018 Apr 2;17(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0347-9.
7
Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers.将自动自我管理 24 小时回忆、4 天食物记录和食物频率问卷中自我报告的膳食摄入量与恢复生物标志物进行比较。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Jan 1;107(1):80-93. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx002.
8
Effect of a price discount and consumer education strategy on food and beverage purchases in remote Indigenous Australia: a stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.偏远地区澳大利亚原住民的食品和饮料购买行为:价格折扣和消费者教育策略的影响:一项阶梯式随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e82-e95. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30043-3. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
9
A Supermarket Double-Dollar Incentive Program Increases Purchases of Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Families With Children: The Healthy Double Study.超级市场双倍优惠激励计划增加有孩子的低收入家庭购买新鲜水果和蔬菜:健康双研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Mar;50(3):217-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.09.013. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
10
Impact of Cooking and Home Food Preparation Interventions Among Adults: A Systematic Review (2011-2016).成人烹饪和家庭食品准备干预措施的影响:系统评价(2011-2016 年)。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;50(2):148-172.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 25.