• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生殖器粉使用与子宫癌风险:前瞻性研究的汇总分析。

Genital powder use and risk of uterine cancer: A pooled analysis of prospective studies.

机构信息

Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2021 Jun 1;148(11):2692-2701. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33470. Epub 2021 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1002/ijc.33470
PMID:33433939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8106926/
Abstract

When powder is applied to the genital area, it has the potential to reach internal reproductive organs and promote carcinogenesis by irritating and inflaming exposed tissues. Although many studies have considered the association between genital powder use and ovarian cancer risk, the relationship between genital powder use and uterine cancer is less well-studied. We pooled data from four large, prospective cohorts (the Nurses' Health Study, the Nurses' Health Study II, the Sister Study and the Women's Health Initiative - Observational Study). We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for prespecified confounders. In total, 209 185 women were included, with 37% reporting ever genital powder use. Over a mean 14.5 years of follow-up, 3272 invasive uterine cancers were diagnosed. There was no overall association between ever genital powder use and uterine cancer (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94-1.09), with little difference observed for frequent (≥1 times/week) vs never use (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.95-1.16; P-for-trend = .46). Long-term use (>20 years; HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.96-1.31; P-for-trend = 0.14) was associated with a small, but not statistically significant, increase in risk, compared to never use. There were not clear differences by uterine cancer histologic subtypes or across strata of relevant covariates, including race/ethnicity, follow-up time, menopausal status and body mass index. The results of this large, pooled analysis do not support a relationship between the use of genital powder and uterine cancer, although the positive associations observed for long-term use may merit further consideration.

摘要

当粉末涂抹于生殖器区域时,它有可能刺激和炎症暴露的组织,进而进入内部生殖器官并促进癌变。虽然许多研究都考虑了生殖器粉末使用与卵巢癌风险之间的关联,但生殖器粉末使用与子宫癌之间的关系研究较少。我们汇集了四项大型前瞻性队列研究(护士健康研究、护士健康研究 II、姐妹研究和妇女健康倡议观察性研究)的数据。我们使用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计危害比(HR)和 95%置信区间(CI),并调整了预先指定的混杂因素。总共有 209185 名女性入组,其中 37%报告有过生殖器粉末使用史。在平均 14.5 年的随访期间,诊断出 3272 例浸润性子宫癌。总体而言,生殖器粉末使用与子宫癌之间没有关联(HR = 1.01,95%CI:0.94-1.09),频繁(≥1 次/周)与从不使用(HR = 1.05,95%CI:0.95-1.16;P 趋势 =.46)之间也没有差异。与从不使用相比,长期使用(>20 年;HR = 1.12,95%CI:0.96-1.31;P 趋势 = 0.14)与风险略有增加相关,但无统计学意义。在子宫癌组织学亚型或相关协变量(包括种族/民族、随访时间、绝经状态和体重指数)的各个分层中,没有明显差异。这项大型的汇集分析结果不支持生殖器粉末使用与子宫癌之间存在关系,尽管长期使用的阳性关联可能需要进一步考虑。

相似文献

1
Genital powder use and risk of uterine cancer: A pooled analysis of prospective studies.生殖器粉使用与子宫癌风险:前瞻性研究的汇总分析。
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jun 1;148(11):2692-2701. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33470. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
Association of Powder Use in the Genital Area With Risk of Ovarian Cancer.外阴使用粉末与卵巢癌风险的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 7;323(1):49-59. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20079.
3
Perineal powder use and risk of ovarian cancer.会阴部使用爽身粉与卵巢癌风险。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 10;106(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju208. Print 2014 Sep.
4
Talc, body powder, and ovarian cancer: A summary of the epidemiologic evidence.滑石粉、爽身粉与卵巢癌:流行病学证据总结。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Oct;163(1):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
Intimate Care Products and Incidence of Hormone-Related Cancers: A Quantitative Bias Analysis.亲密护理产品与激素相关癌症的发病:定量偏倚分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;42(22):2645-2659. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02037. Epub 2024 May 15.
6
Perineal Talc Use, Douching, and the Risk of Uterine Cancer.会阴部滑石粉使用、冲洗与子宫癌风险。
Epidemiology. 2019 Nov;30(6):845-852. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001078.
7
Perineal use of talcum powder and endometrial cancer risk.会阴使用滑石粉与子宫内膜癌风险。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 May;19(5):1269-75. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1221. Epub 2010 Apr 20.
8
The association between douching, genital talc use, and the risk of prevalent and incident cervical cancer.冲洗、外阴滑石粉使用与宫颈癌现患和发病风险的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 21;11(1):14836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94447-3.
9
Genital powder use and risk of ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis of 8,525 cases and 9,859 controls.外阴使用粉剂与卵巢癌风险:8525 例病例和 9859 例对照的汇总分析。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2013 Aug;6(8):811-21. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0037. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10
Perineal powder use and risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women.绝经后妇女使用会阴粉与子宫内膜癌风险。
Cancer Causes Control. 2012 Oct;23(10):1673-80. doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0046-3. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding the Link Between Talcum Powder and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.解读滑石粉与卵巢癌之间的联系:一项全面综述。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 14;14(16):5746. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165746.
2
Intimate Care Products and Incidence of Hormone-Related Cancers: A Quantitative Bias Analysis.亲密护理产品与激素相关癌症的发病:定量偏倚分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 1;42(22):2645-2659. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02037. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Use of personal care product mixtures and incident hormone-sensitive cancers in the Sister Study: A U.S.-wide prospective cohort.使用个人护理产品混合物和偶发性激素敏感性癌症的姐妹研究:一项美国范围内的前瞻性队列研究。
Environ Int. 2024 Jan;183:108298. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108298. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Talc, body powder, and ovarian cancer: A summary of the epidemiologic evidence.滑石粉、爽身粉与卵巢癌:流行病学证据总结。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Oct;163(1):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.032. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
5
The association between douching, genital talc use, and the risk of prevalent and incident cervical cancer.冲洗、外阴滑石粉使用与宫颈癌现患和发病风险的关联。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 21;11(1):14836. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94447-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Powder Use in the Genital Area With Risk of Ovarian Cancer.外阴使用粉末与卵巢癌风险的关联。
JAMA. 2020 Jan 7;323(1):49-59. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20079.
2
Perineal Talc Use, Douching, and the Risk of Uterine Cancer.会阴部滑石粉使用、冲洗与子宫癌风险。
Epidemiology. 2019 Nov;30(6):845-852. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001078.
3
Talc, Asbestos, and Epidemiology: Corporate Influence and Scientific Incognizance.滑石粉、石棉与流行病学:企业影响与科学忽视
Epidemiology. 2019 Nov;30(6):783-788. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001091.
4
Hysterectomy-Corrected Uterine Corpus Cancer Incidence Trends and Differences in Relative Survival Reveal Racial Disparities and Rising Rates of Nonendometrioid Cancers.子宫切除术校正的子宫体癌发病趋势和相对生存率差异揭示了种族差异和非子宫内膜样癌发病率的上升。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;37(22):1895-1908. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00151. Epub 2019 May 22.
5
The Sister Study Cohort: Baseline Methods and Participant Characteristics.姐妹研究队列:基线方法和参与者特征。
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Dec 20;125(12):127003. doi: 10.1289/EHP1923.
6
Perineal Talc Use and Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.会阴部滑石粉使用与卵巢癌:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epidemiology. 2018 Jan;29(1):41-49. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000745.
7
Body Powder and Ovarian Cancer Risk-What Is the Role of Recall Bias?爽身粉与卵巢癌风险——回忆偏倚起了什么作用?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Oct;25(10):1369-1370. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0476.
8
Origin, Methods, and Evolution of the Three Nurses' Health Studies.三项护士健康研究的起源、方法与演变
Am J Public Health. 2016 Sep;106(9):1573-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303338. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
9
Association between Body Powder Use and Ovarian Cancer: The African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES).使用爽身粉与卵巢癌之间的关联:非裔美国人癌症流行病学研究(AACES)
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Oct;25(10):1411-1417. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1281. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
The Association Between Talc Use and Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Case-Control Study in Two US States.滑石粉使用与卵巢癌之间的关联:美国两个州的一项回顾性病例对照研究。
Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):334-46. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000434.