Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Håkon Jarls gate 11 and Mauritz Hanssens gate, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Center for Oral Health Services and Research (TkMidt), Trondheim, Norway.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 13;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01836-z.
US and European guidelines diverge on whether to vaccinate adults who are not at high risk for cardiovascular events against influenza. Here, we investigated the associations between influenza vaccination and risk for acute myocardial infarction, stroke and pulmonary embolism during the 2009 pandemic in Norway, when vaccination was recommended to all adults.
Using national registers, we studied all vaccinated Norwegian individuals who suffered AMI, stroke, or pulmonary embolism from May 1, 2009 through September 30, 2010. We defined higher-risk individuals as those using anti-diabetic, anti-obesity, anti-thrombotic, pulmonary or cardiovascular medications (i.e. individuals to whom vaccination was routinely recommended); all other individuals were regarded as having lower-risk. We estimated incidence rate ratios with 95% CI using conditional Poisson regression in the pre-defined risk periods up to 180 days following vaccination compared to an unexposed time-period, with adjustment for season or daily temperature.
Overall, we observed lower risk for cardiovascular events following influenza vaccination. When stratified by baseline risk, we observed lower risk across all three outcomes in association with vaccination among higher-risk individuals. In this subgroup, relative risks were 0.72 (0.59-0.88) for AMI, 0.77 (0.59-0.99) for stroke, and 0.73 (0.45-1.19) for pulmonary embolism in the period 1-14 days following vaccination when compared to the background period. These associations remained essentially the same up to 180 days after vaccination. In contrast, the corresponding relative risks among subjects not using medications were 4.19 (2.69-6.52), 1.73 (0.91-3.31) and 2.35 (0.78-7.06).
In this nationwide study, influenza vaccination was associated with overall cardiovascular benefit. This benefit was concentrated among those at higher cardiovascular risk as defined by medication use. In contrast, our results demonstrate no comparable inverse association with thrombosis-related cardiovascular events following vaccination among those free of cardiovascular medications at baseline. These results may inform the risk-benefit balance for universal influenza vaccination.
美国和欧洲的指南在是否为非心血管事件高危成人接种流感疫苗方面存在分歧。在这里,我们研究了 2009 年挪威大流行期间接种疫苗与急性心肌梗死、中风和肺栓塞风险之间的关系,当时建议所有成年人接种疫苗。
使用国家登记册,我们研究了 2009 年 5 月 1 日至 2010 年 9 月 30 日期间患有急性心肌梗死、中风或肺栓塞的所有接种挪威个体。我们将高风险个体定义为使用抗糖尿病、抗肥胖、抗血栓、肺部或心血管药物的个体(即常规推荐接种疫苗的个体);所有其他个体被视为低风险。我们使用条件泊松回归在接种后 180 天内的预先定义的风险期内估计发病率比(95%CI),并根据季节或每日温度进行调整。
总体而言,我们观察到流感疫苗接种后心血管事件的风险降低。按基线风险分层后,我们在高风险人群中观察到所有三种结局与接种疫苗相关的风险降低。在这个亚组中,与背景期相比,接种疫苗后 1-14 天的急性心肌梗死相对风险为 0.72(0.59-0.88),中风为 0.77(0.59-0.99),肺栓塞为 0.73(0.45-1.19)。这些关联在接种疫苗后 180 天内基本保持不变。相比之下,在未使用药物的受试者中,相应的相对风险为 4.19(2.69-6.52)、1.73(0.91-3.31)和 2.35(0.78-7.06)。
在这项全国性研究中,流感疫苗接种与整体心血管获益相关。这种益处集中在那些使用药物定义的较高心血管风险的人群中。相比之下,我们的结果表明,在基线无心血管药物的人群中,接种疫苗后与血栓相关的心血管事件没有类似的负相关。这些结果可能为普遍接种流感疫苗的风险效益平衡提供信息。