• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在快速的环境变化下,基于探索的赢留亏转、展望型解决方案策略可能无法适应。

Win-stay/lose-switch, prospecting-based settlement strategy may not be adaptive under rapid environmental change.

机构信息

Institute of Zoology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Wojska Polskiego 71C, 60-625, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79942-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-79942-3
PMID:33436762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7804401/
Abstract

Understanding animal responses to environmental change is crucial for management of ecological traps. Between-year habitat selection was investigated in red-necked grebes (Podiceps grisegena) breeding on semi-natural fish ponds, where differential stocking of fish created contrasting yet poorly predictable brood-stage food availabilities. Grebes lured to low-quality ponds were more likely to shift territories than birds nesting on high-quality ponds, and tended to move to ponds whose habitat quality had been high in the previous year, irrespective of the current quality of the new and old territories. The territory switchers typically visited their future breeding ponds during or immediately after the brood-rearing period. However, owing to rotation of fish stocks, the habitat quality of many ponds changed in the following year, and then switchers from low-quality ponds and stayers on previously high-quality ponds were ecologically trapped. Thus, although breeders were making an informed choice, their settlement decisions, based on the win-stay/lose-switch rule and prospecting a year in advance, were inappropriate in conditions of year-to-year habitat fluctuations. Effective adaptation to rapid environmental change may necessitate both learning to correctly evaluate uncertain environmental cues and abandonment of previously adaptive decision-making algorithms (here prioritizing past-year information and assuming temporal autocorrelation of habitat quality).

摘要

了解动物对环境变化的反应对于管理生态陷阱至关重要。本研究调查了在半自然鱼塘繁殖的赤颈䴙䴘(Podiceps grisegena)的年际生境选择,鱼类的差异放养导致了截然不同但难以预测的育雏期食物可获得性。被吸引到低质量池塘的䴙䴘比在高质量池塘筑巢的鸟类更有可能改变领地,并且倾向于迁移到前一年栖息地质量较高的池塘,而不论新老领地的当前质量如何。领地转换者通常在育雏期或之后立即访问他们未来的繁殖池塘。然而,由于鱼类种群的轮换,许多池塘的栖息地质量在次年发生了变化,然后来自低质量池塘的转换者和之前高质量池塘的留守者就会陷入生态陷阱。因此,尽管繁殖者做出了明智的选择,但基于赢留输换规则和提前一年探勘,他们的定居决策在年际生境波动的情况下是不恰当的。为了有效适应快速的环境变化,可能需要学会正确评估不确定的环境线索,并放弃以前的适应性决策算法(这里优先考虑去年的信息,并假设栖息地质量的时间自相关)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8360/7804401/cbbcf89cbae6/41598_2020_79942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8360/7804401/cbbcf89cbae6/41598_2020_79942_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8360/7804401/cbbcf89cbae6/41598_2020_79942_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Win-stay/lose-switch, prospecting-based settlement strategy may not be adaptive under rapid environmental change.在快速的环境变化下,基于探索的赢留亏转、展望型解决方案策略可能无法适应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79942-3.
2
A novel strategy to escape a poor habitat: red-necked grebes transfer flightless young to other ponds.一种逃离恶劣栖息地的新策略:赤颈䴙䴘将无法飞行的幼鸟转移到其他池塘。
Acta Ethol. 2017;20(2):191-195. doi: 10.1007/s10211-017-0254-7. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
3
Consequences of the size structure of fish populations for their effects on a generalist avian predator.鱼类种群的大小结构对其对一般鸟类捕食者的影响的后果。
Oecologia. 2011 Jun;166(2):517-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-010-1862-3. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
4
Informed breeding dispersal following stochastic changes to patch quality in a pond-breeding amphibian.在池塘繁殖的两栖动物中,随着斑块质量的随机变化进行明智的繁殖扩散。
J Anim Ecol. 2021 Aug;90(8):1878-1890. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13503. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Prospectors combine social and environmental information to improve habitat selection and breeding success in the subsequent year.勘探者结合社会和环境信息,以提高次年的栖息地选择和繁殖成功率。
J Anim Ecol. 2011 Nov;80(6):1227-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01854.x. Epub 2011 May 13.
6
Habitat selection by breeding waterbirds at ponds with size-structured fish populations.在具有大小结构鱼类种群的池塘中繁殖水鸟的栖息地选择
Naturwissenschaften. 2010 Jul;97(7):673-82. doi: 10.1007/s00114-010-0684-9. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
7
Conspecific cues and breeding habitat selection in an endangered woodland warbler.同物种线索与濒危林莺的繁殖栖息地选择。
J Anim Ecol. 2012 Sep;81(5):1056-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01995.x. Epub 2012 May 1.
8
Evidence of postbreeding prospecting in a long-distance migrant.远距离迁徙鸟类繁殖后探索行为的证据。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Dec 16;11(1):599-611. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7085. eCollection 2021 Jan.
9
Predicting Habitat Choice after Rapid Environmental Change.预测快速环境变化后的栖息地选择。
Am Nat. 2019 May;193(5):619-632. doi: 10.1086/702590. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
10
Nestsite selection by male loons leads to sex-biased site familiarity.雄性潜鸟对巢穴地点的选择导致了性别偏向的地点熟悉度。
J Anim Ecol. 2008 Mar;77(2):205-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01334.x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
The flexibility of social learning and its conservation implications in mammals and beyond.社会学习的灵活性及其在哺乳动物及其他动物中的保护意义。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 May;380(1925):20240136. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0136. Epub 2025 May 1.
2
Previous reproductive success and environmental variation influence nest-site fidelity of a subarctic-nesting goose.以往的繁殖成功率和环境变化会影响亚北极地区筑巢鹅的巢址忠诚度。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Oct 11;14(10):e70313. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70313. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Seabirds show foraging site and route fidelity but demonstrate flexibility in response to local information.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid environmental change in games: complications and counter-intuitive outcomes.游戏中的快速环境变化:复杂性和违反直觉的结果。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 14;9(1):7373. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43770-x.
2
Predicting Habitat Choice after Rapid Environmental Change.预测快速环境变化后的栖息地选择。
Am Nat. 2019 May;193(5):619-632. doi: 10.1086/702590. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
3
WHEN DOES EVOLUTION BY NATURAL SELECTION PREVENT EXTINCTION?自然选择导致的进化在何时能够防止物种灭绝?
海鸟表现出觅食地点和路线的忠诚度,但会根据当地信息展现出灵活性。
Mov Ecol. 2024 Jun 13;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40462-024-00467-9.
4
Site fidelity of migratory shorebirds facing habitat deterioration: insights from satellite tracking and mark-resighting.面临栖息地退化的迁徙滨鸟的地点忠诚度:来自卫星追踪和标记重捕法的见解
Mov Ecol. 2023 Dec 21;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40462-023-00443-9.
5
Age, brood fate, and territory quality affect nest-site fidelity in white stork Ciconia ciconia.年龄、繁殖命运和领地质量会影响白鹳(Ciconia ciconia)的巢址忠诚度。
Front Zool. 2023 Sep 21;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12983-023-00506-y.
6
Reuse of nests in the Great Reed Warbler : A behavior to save time and energy and to deter nest parasites?大苇莺对巢穴的重复利用:一种节省时间和精力以及抵御巢寄生生物的行为?
Ecol Evol. 2022 Oct 27;12(10):e9452. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9452. eCollection 2022 Oct.
Evolution. 1995 Feb;49(1):201-207. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05971.x.
4
Experimental increase of predation risk induces breeding dispersal of Tengmalm's owl.实验性增加捕食风险会引发乌林鸮的繁殖扩散。
Oecologia. 2001 Feb;126(3):355-359. doi: 10.1007/s004420000525. Epub 2001 Feb 1.
5
The Emergent Properties of Conspecific Attraction Can Limit a Species' Ability to Track Environmental Change.同种吸引的涌现特性可能会限制一个物种追踪环境变化的能力。
Am Nat. 2017 Jun;189(6):726-733. doi: 10.1086/691469. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
Contextual influences on animal decision-making: Significance for behavior-based wildlife conservation and management.情境对动物决策的影响:对基于行为的野生动物保护与管理的意义。
Integr Zool. 2017 Jan;12(1):32-48. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12235.
7
The evolution of decision rules in complex environments.复杂环境下决策规则的演变。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Mar;18(3):153-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.012. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
8
Prospecting and dispersal: their eco-evolutionary dynamics and implications for population patterns.扩散与散布:它们的生态进化动态及其对种群模式的影响。
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 22;281(1778):20132851. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2851. Print 2014 Mar 7.
9
Can settlement in natal-like habitat explain maladaptive habitat selection?在类似出生地的生境中定居能否解释适应不良的生境选择?
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jun 26;280(1765):20130979. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.0979. Print 2013 Aug 22.
10
Ecological novelty and the emergence of evolutionary traps.生态新颖性与进化陷阱的出现。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Sep;28(9):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Jun 5.