Najafipour Sedigheh, Mortaz Hejri Sara, Nikbakht Nasrabadi Alireza, Yekaninejad Mir Saeed, Shirazi Mandana, Labaf Ali, Jalili Mohammad
Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Institute of Health Science Education, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020 Sep 24;34:126. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.34.126. eCollection 2020.
A few studies have been done regarding the validity and reliability of the Mini-Peer Assessment Tool across various specialties. This study was conducted to determine the reliability, content and construct validity of Mini-Peer Assessment Tool to assess the competency of emergency medicine residents. This study was carried out to investigate the psychometric properties of the mini-PAT tool to evaluate the professional competencies of emergency medicine residents in educational hospitals affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. The initial Mini-Peer Assessment Tool was translated into Persian. After that, the content validity index and content validity ratio determined by consulting 12 professors of emergency medicine. The construct validity was determined with exploratory factor analysis and investigation of the correlation coefficient on 31 self and 248 peer assessment cases. The reliability of the mini peer assessment tool was determined by internal consistency and item deletion by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Reliability was also assessed by determining the agreement between the two tools of self-assessment and peer assessment by using the diagram Bland and Altman. The results showed content validity ratio (CVR) of the items ranged from 0.56 to 0.83, and the content validity index (CVI) of the items ranged from 0.72 to 0.90. The reliability of the self-assessment and peer-assessment tools were 0.83 and 0.95 respectively and there was a relative agreement between the self-assessment method and the peer assessment method. Finally, the tool underwent exploratory factor analysis resulting extraction into two factors namely 'clinical competencies' and 'human interactions' in the peer assessment tool. In the self-assessment tool, the factors of 'good practice' and 'technical competence' were extracted. The results of the present study provided evidence of the adequacy of content validity, reliability of the contextually customized mini-peer assessment tool in assessing the competencies of emergency medicine residents.
关于迷你同伴评估工具在各个专业中的有效性和可靠性,已经开展了一些研究。本研究旨在确定迷你同伴评估工具在评估急诊医学住院医师能力方面的可靠性、内容效度和结构效度。本研究旨在调查迷你PAT工具的心理测量特性,以评估德黑兰医科大学附属教学医院中急诊医学住院医师的专业能力。最初的迷你同伴评估工具被翻译成波斯语。之后,通过咨询12位急诊医学教授来确定内容效度指数和内容效度比率。通过探索性因素分析以及对31份自我评估和248份同伴评估案例的相关系数调查来确定结构效度。迷你同伴评估工具的可靠性通过使用克朗巴哈α系数进行内部一致性和项目删除来确定。还通过使用布兰德和奥特曼图确定自我评估和同伴评估这两种工具之间的一致性来评估可靠性。结果显示,各项目的内容效度比率(CVR)在0.56至0.83之间,各项目的内容效度指数(CVI)在0.72至0.90之间。自我评估工具和同伴评估工具的可靠性分别为0.83和0.95,自我评估方法和同伴评估方法之间存在相对一致性。最后,该工具进行了探索性因素分析,在同伴评估工具中提取出了两个因素,即“临床能力”和“人际互动”。在自我评估工具中,提取出了“良好实践”和“技术能力”这两个因素。本研究结果为情境定制的迷你同伴评估工具在评估急诊医学住院医师能力方面的内容效度充分性和可靠性提供了证据。