• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment.基于低成本消费级髋部和腕部活动监测器的步幅和距离测量:有效性和可靠性评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 13;10(1):e21262. doi: 10.2196/21262.
2
Formative Evaluation of Consumer-Grade Activity Monitors Worn by Older Adults: Test-Retest Reliability and Criterion Validity of Step Counts.老年人佩戴的消费级活动监测器的形成性评估:步数的重测信度和效标效度。
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Aug 18;4(8):e16537. doi: 10.2196/16537.
3
Validity of FitBit, Jawbone UP, Nike+ and other wearable devices for level and stair walking.FitBit、Jawbone UP、Nike+及其他可穿戴设备用于平路和上楼梯行走的有效性。
Gait Posture. 2016 Jul;48:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.025. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
4
Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking.在跑步机行走期间对Fitbit One活动监测设备的验证。
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.10.241. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
The validity of activity trackers is affected by walking speed: the criterion validity of Garmin Vivosmart HR and StepWatch 3 for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions.活动追踪器的有效性受步行速度影响:佳明Vivosmart HR和StepWatch 3在受控条件下于不同步行速度时测量步数的标准效度。
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 14;8:e9381. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9381. eCollection 2020.
6
The validity and accuracy of wrist-worn activity monitors in lower-limb prosthesis users.腕戴式活动监测器在下肢假肢使用者中的有效性和准确性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3182-3188. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587792. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
7
Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: The effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site.通过身体活动监测器测量步数的准确性:步态速度和解剖学放置部位的影响。
Gait Posture. 2017 Sep;57:199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
Validation of the ADAMO Care Watch for step counting in older adults.ADAMO Care Watch用于老年人步数计数的验证。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 9;13(2):e0190753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190753. eCollection 2018.
9
Assessing the reliability and validity of a shorter walk test compared with the 10-Meter Walk Test for measurements of gait speed in healthy, older adults.评估更短的步行测试与 10 米步行测试相比在健康老年人步态速度测量中的可靠性和有效性。
J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;36(1):24-30. doi: 10.1519/JPT.0b013e318248e20d.
10
Accuracy and Reliability of a Suite of Digital Measures of Walking Generated Using a Wrist-Worn Sensor in Healthy Individuals: Performance Characterization Study.使用腕部佩戴式传感器生成的一组健康个体步行数字测量指标的准确性和可靠性:性能特征研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Aug 3;10:e48270. doi: 10.2196/48270.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing and Qualifying Neighborhood Walkability for Older Adults: Construction and Initial Testing of a Multivariate Spatial Accessibility Model.评估和确定老年人居住环境的步行适宜性:多变量空间可达性模型的构建与初步测试。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 5;19(3):1808. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031808.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Daily Step Count and Step Intensity With Mortality Among US Adults.美国成年人的日常步数和步频与死亡率的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 24;323(12):1151-1160. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1382.
2
Windows Into Human Health Through Wearables Data Analytics.通过可穿戴设备数据分析洞察人类健康
Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar;9:28-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cobme.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
3
Accuracy of Wristband Fitbit Models in Assessing Sleep: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腕部 Fitbit 型号设备评估睡眠的准确性:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 28;21(11):e16273. doi: 10.2196/16273.
4
Accuracy of a smartphone pedometer application according to different speeds and mobile phone locations in a laboratory context.在实验室环境中,根据不同速度和手机位置评估一款智能手机计步器应用程序的准确性。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2018 Aug;16(2):43-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.05.001. Epub 2018 May 19.
5
Validity of the "Samsung Health" application to measure steps: A study with two different samsung smartphones."三星健康"应用程序测量步数的有效性:使用两款不同三星智能手机的研究。
J Sports Sci. 2019 Apr;37(7):788-794. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1527199. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
6
How well do activity monitors estimate energy expenditure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity of current technologies.活动监测器在多大程度上能准确估计能量消耗?当前技术有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):332-340. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099643. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
7
Accuracy and Acceptability of Commercial-Grade Physical Activity Monitors in Older Adults.商业级身体活动监测器在老年人中的准确性和可接受性
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 Apr 1;27(2):222-229. doi: 10.1123/japa.2018-0036. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
8
Accuracy of Fitbit Devices: Systematic Review and Narrative Syntheses of Quantitative Data.Fitbit设备的准确性:定量数据的系统评价与叙述性综合分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Aug 9;6(8):e10527. doi: 10.2196/10527.
9
Self-monitoring to increase physical activity in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.自我监测以增加心血管疾病患者的身体活动:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019 Feb;31(2):163-173. doi: 10.1007/s40520-018-0960-7. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
10
Evaluating the Validity of Current Mainstream Wearable Devices in Fitness Tracking Under Various Physical Activities: Comparative Study.评估当前主流可穿戴设备在各种体育活动中进行健身追踪的有效性:比较研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Apr 12;6(4):e94. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9754.

基于低成本消费级髋部和腕部活动监测器的步幅和距离测量:有效性和可靠性评估方案

Step and Distance Measurement From a Low-Cost Consumer-Based Hip and Wrist Activity Monitor: Protocol for a Validity and Reliability Assessment.

作者信息

Carlin Thomas, Vuillerme Nicolas

机构信息

AGEIS, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.

LabCom Telecom4Health, University Grenoble Alpes & Orange Labs, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 13;10(1):e21262. doi: 10.2196/21262.

DOI:10.2196/21262
PMID:33439138
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7840275/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-tracking via wearable and mobile technologies is becoming an essential part of personal health management. At this point, however, little information is available to substantiate the validity and reliability of low-cost consumer-based hip and wrist activity monitors, with regard more specifically to the measurements of step counts and distance traveled while walking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study is to assess the validity and reliability of step and distance measurement from a low-cost consumer-based hip and wrist activity monitor specific in various walking conditions that are commonly encountered in daily life. Specifically, this study is designed to evaluate whether and to what extent validity and reliability could depend on the sensor placement on the human body and the walking task being performed.

METHODS

Thirty healthy participants will be instructed to wear four PBN 2433 (Nakosite) activity monitors simultaneously, with one placed on each hip and each wrist. Participants will attend two experimental sessions separated by 1 week. During each experimental session, two separate studies will be performed. In study 1, participants will be instructed to complete a 2-minute walk test along a 30-meter indoor corridor under 3 walking speeds: very slow, slow, and usual speed. In study 2, participants will be required to complete the following 3 conditions performed at usual walking speed: walking on flat ground, upstairs, and downstairs. Activity monitor measured step count and distance values will be computed along with the actual step count (determined from video recordings) and distance (measured using a measuring tape) to determine validity and reliability for each activity monitor placement and each walking condition.

RESULTS

Participant recruitment and data collection began in January 2020. As of June 2020, we enrolled 8 participants. Dissemination of study results in peer-reviewed journals is expected in spring 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that examines the validity and reliability of step and distance measurement during walking using the PBN 2433 (Nakosite) activity monitor. Results of this study will provide beneficial information on the effects of activity monitor placement, walking speed, and walking tasks on the validity and reliability of step and distance measurement. We believe such information is of utmost importance to general consumers, clinicians, and researchers.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/21262.

摘要

背景

通过可穿戴和移动技术进行自我追踪正成为个人健康管理的重要组成部分。然而,目前几乎没有信息能够证实基于消费者的低成本髋部和腕部活动监测器的有效性和可靠性,尤其是在步行步数和行走距离的测量方面。

目的

我们研究的目的是评估一种基于消费者的低成本髋部和腕部活动监测器在日常生活中常见的各种步行条件下进行步数和距离测量的有效性和可靠性。具体而言,本研究旨在评估有效性和可靠性是否以及在多大程度上取决于传感器在人体上的放置位置和所执行的步行任务。

方法

30名健康参与者将被要求同时佩戴4个PBN 2433(Nakosite)活动监测器,每个髋部和每个腕部分别佩戴一个。参与者将参加两个相隔1周的实验环节。在每个实验环节中,将进行两项独立的研究。在研究1中,参与者将被要求在3种步行速度下沿着30米长的室内走廊完成2分钟的步行测试:非常慢、慢和正常速度。在研究2中,参与者将被要求以正常步行速度完成以下3种情况:在平地上行走、上楼梯和下楼梯。将计算活动监测器测量的步数和距离值,并与实际步数(通过视频记录确定)和距离(使用卷尺测量)进行比较,以确定每个活动监测器放置位置和每种步行条件下的有效性和可靠性。

结果

参与者招募和数据收集于2020年1月开始。截至2020年6月,我们招募了8名参与者。预计将于2021年春季在同行评审期刊上发表研究结果。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项使用PBN 2433(Nakosite)活动监测器研究步行过程中步数和距离测量的有效性和可靠性的研究。本研究结果将提供有关活动监测器放置位置、步行速度和步行任务对步数和距离测量的有效性和可靠性影响的有益信息。我们相信这些信息对普通消费者、临床医生和研究人员至关重要。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/21262。