• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马达加斯加图阿马西纳的粪便污泥管理:清空-运输-处理。

Faecal sludge management in Toamasina, Madagascar: Emptying - Transport - Treatment.

机构信息

Protos, Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Join For Water (Protos), Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2021 Mar 1;281:111808. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111808. Epub 2021 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111808
PMID:33440324
Abstract

In Toamasina, the second largest city in Madagascar with 326,286 inhabitants and located at sea level, 97% of households uses latrines. The city produces 14,100 m³ faecal sludge per year and 28,000 latrines need to be emptied annually. Most latrines are emptied manually and sludge used to be buried in the compound, thus contaminating sub surface water that is used for domestic purposes by 60% of the population. This article shows how through an action-research process coordinated by Join For Water emptying, transport and treatment services were improved, these services remain accessible to the lowest social class, and a profitable private service provider, Clean Impact, was created. It further describes the construction of a treatment plant consisting of planted humification beds, and the process towards a sustainable exploitation, today managed by Clean Impact.

摘要

在马达加斯加第二大城市图阿马西纳,97%的家庭使用厕所,这里有 326286 名居民,位于海平面。该城市每年产生 14100 立方米粪便污泥,每年需要清空 28000 个厕所。大多数厕所都是人工清空的,污泥过去常被埋在院子里,从而污染了 60%的人口用于家庭用途的地下水。本文介绍了通过一个由 Join For Water 协调的行动研究过程,如何改进清空、运输和处理服务,这些服务仍然可以为社会最底层的人群提供,并且创建了一个盈利的私营服务提供商 Clean Impact。它进一步描述了一个处理厂的建设,包括种植腐殖化床,以及朝着可持续利用的方向发展,今天由 Clean Impact 管理。

相似文献

1
Faecal sludge management in Toamasina, Madagascar: Emptying - Transport - Treatment.马达加斯加图阿马西纳的粪便污泥管理:清空-运输-处理。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Mar 1;281:111808. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111808. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
2
Sludge bomb: The impending sludge emptying and treatment crisis in Blantyre, Malawi.污泥弹:马拉维布兰太尔即将到来的污泥排空和处理危机。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111474. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111474. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
Fecal Sludge Management in Low Income Settlements: Case Study of Nakuru, Kenya.低收入住区的粪便污泥管理:肯尼亚纳库鲁案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;9:750309. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750309. eCollection 2021.
4
Towards sustainable sanitation management: Establishing the costs and willingness to pay for emptying and transporting sludge in rural districts with high rates of access to latrines.迈向可持续卫生管理:确定在高比例使用厕所的农村地区进行污泥清掏和运输的成本及支付意愿。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 21;12(3):e0171735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171735. eCollection 2017.
5
Impact of an intervention to improve pit latrine emptying practices in low income urban neighborhoods of Maputo, Mozambique.改善莫桑比克马普托低收入城市社区坑式厕所清空做法的干预措施的影响。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020 May;226:113480. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113480. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
6
Rheological characteristics of faecal sludge from VIP latrines and implications on pit emptying.粪便污泥的流变特性及其对坑洼排空的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Dec 15;228:149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.098. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
7
Faecal sludge in Accra, Ghana: problems of urban provision.加纳阿克拉的粪便污泥:城市供应问题。
Water Sci Technol. 2009;60(3):623-31. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.441.
8
Community Faecal Management Strategies and Perceptions on Sludge Use in Agriculture.社区粪便管理策略以及对农业污泥利用的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4128. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114128.
9
Methods to reliably estimate faecal sludge quantities and qualities for the design of treatment technologies and management solutions.可靠估计粪便污泥数量和质量的方法,以设计处理技术和管理解决方案。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Oct 1;223:898-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.100. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
10
Is there a difference in prevalence of helminths between households using ecological sanitation and those using traditional pit latrines? A latrine based cross sectional comparative study in Malawi.使用生态卫生设施的家庭与使用传统坑式厕所的家庭之间,蠕虫的流行率是否存在差异?在马拉维进行的一项基于厕所的横断面比较研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2017 Jun 9;10(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2519-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Out of sight, out of mind: Understanding the sanitation crisis in global South cities.眼不见,心不烦:了解全球南方城市的卫生危机。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Mar 15;306:114285. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114285. Epub 2022 Jan 10.