• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑参考低碳效应和低碳善意的双渠道供应链合作减排的动态优化与协调

Dynamic Optimization and Coordination of Cooperative Emission Reduction in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Reference Low-Carbon Effect and Low-Carbon Goodwill.

机构信息

School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020539.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18020539
PMID:33440706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7826876/
Abstract

Although the issue of cooperative emission reduction in supply chains has been extensively studied, there is little literature that considers the impact of consumers' reference low-carbon effect and product low-carbon goodwill on their purchasing behavior in the issue of dual-channel supply chain cooperative emission reduction. In order to explore the impact of consumers' reference low-carbon effect and product low-carbon goodwill on the balanced emission reduction decisions and profit of dual-channel supply chain members, we establish a dual-channel supply chain emission reduction dynamic optimization model, use differential game theory to solve the manufacturer's optimal emission reduction investment and the retailer's optimal low-carbon publicity investment strategies under four different decision scenarios, and analyze them in detail. In addition, we also design an effective low-carbon publicity cost-sharing contract to achieve coordination of the supply chain. The research results show that the equilibrium strategies of the manufacturer and retailer and the overall profit of the supply chain under the centralized decision scenario are better than those of decentralized decision scenario. When the initial reference low-carbon level is low, the online and offline reference low-carbon effects are beneficial to the manufacturer and retailer. When the initial low-carbon goodwill is high, it is beneficial for both the manufacturer and retailer to increase consumer recognition of low-carbon goodwill. When the ratio of low-carbon publicity cost sharing provided by the manufacturer to the retailer is within a reasonable range, the cost-sharing contract can reduce the double marginal effect and achieve supply chain coordination.

摘要

尽管供应链中的合作减排问题已经得到广泛研究,但很少有文献考虑消费者的参考低碳效应和产品低碳善意对其在双渠道供应链合作减排问题中的购买行为的影响。为了探讨消费者的参考低碳效应和产品低碳善意对双渠道供应链成员平衡减排决策和利润的影响,我们建立了一个双渠道供应链减排动态优化模型,使用微分博弈理论来解决制造商在四种不同决策情景下的最优减排投资和零售商的最优低碳宣传投资策略,并进行了详细分析。此外,我们还设计了一种有效的低碳宣传成本分担合同,以实现供应链的协调。研究结果表明,集中决策情景下制造商和零售商的均衡策略以及供应链的整体利润均优于分散决策情景。当初始参考低碳水平较低时,线上和线下参考低碳效应对制造商和零售商都有利。当初始低碳善意较高时,增加消费者对低碳善意的认知对制造商和零售商都有利。当制造商向零售商提供的低碳宣传成本分担比例在合理范围内时,成本分担合同可以降低双重边际效应,实现供应链协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/432fe99182ae/ijerph-18-00539-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/377f63d36c5b/ijerph-18-00539-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/386392903393/ijerph-18-00539-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/5b358b3b360b/ijerph-18-00539-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/dd3e71a069db/ijerph-18-00539-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/eb6c254e212f/ijerph-18-00539-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/589a45e2e658/ijerph-18-00539-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/36d9795b77d2/ijerph-18-00539-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/d7ba1963c0dc/ijerph-18-00539-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/432fe99182ae/ijerph-18-00539-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/377f63d36c5b/ijerph-18-00539-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/386392903393/ijerph-18-00539-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/5b358b3b360b/ijerph-18-00539-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/dd3e71a069db/ijerph-18-00539-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/eb6c254e212f/ijerph-18-00539-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/589a45e2e658/ijerph-18-00539-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/36d9795b77d2/ijerph-18-00539-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/d7ba1963c0dc/ijerph-18-00539-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/21bd/7826876/432fe99182ae/ijerph-18-00539-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Optimization and Coordination of Cooperative Emission Reduction in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain Considering Reference Low-Carbon Effect and Low-Carbon Goodwill.考虑参考低碳效应和低碳善意的双渠道供应链合作减排的动态优化与协调
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):539. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020539.
2
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
3
Pricing and coordination in a dual-channel supply chain with a socially responsible manufacturer.具有社会责任的制造商的双渠道供应链中的定价与协调。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 29;15(7):e0236099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236099. eCollection 2020.
4
Research on carbon emission reduction and blockchain investment under different dual-channel supply chains.不同双渠道供应链下的碳排放减少与区块链投资研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(43):65304-65321. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20366-z. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
5
Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下风险规避的低碳供应链协调决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052656.
6
Carbon emission reduction cooperation of three-echelon supply chain under consumer environmental awareness and cap-and-trade regulation.消费者环境意识和总量管制与交易制度下的三级供应链的碳排放减排合作。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(54):82411-82438. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20190-5. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
7
Low-carbon strategies in dual-channel supply chain under risk aversion.规避风险下的双渠道供应链低碳策略。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Mar 14;19(5):4765-4793. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022223.
8
Optimal control of carbon emission reduction strategies in supply chain with wholesale price and consignment contract.供应链中批发价格和寄售合同下的碳减排策略的最优控制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(43):61707-61722. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15080-1. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
9
Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract.不同权力结构下的绿色供应链决策:批发价与收益共享合同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217737.
10
Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下公平关切的低碳供应链最优定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020556.

引用本文的文献

1
Research on differential game strategy of debt restructuring supported by government.政府支持下债务重组的微分对策研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0284044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284044. eCollection 2023.
2
Evolution of Low Carbon Supply Chain Research: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis.低碳供应链研究的演进:系统的文献计量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15541. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315541.
3
Low-Carbon Transition Models of High Carbon Supply Chains under the Mixed Carbon Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Tax Policy in the Carbon Neutrality Era.

本文引用的文献

1
Competition among Supply Chains and Governmental Policy: Considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference.供应链竞争与政府政策:考虑消费者低碳偏好
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 12;15(9):1985. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091985.
碳中和时代下混合碳限额与交易和碳税政策下高碳供应链的低碳转型模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;19(18):11150. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811150.
4
Joint Green Marketing Decision-Making of Green Supply Chain Considering Power Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility.考虑权力结构和企业社会责任的绿色供应链联合绿色营销决策
Entropy (Basel). 2021 May 1;23(5):564. doi: 10.3390/e23050564.