• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑碳税监管和公平关切的可持续供应链的联合决策与协调。

Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns.

机构信息

College of Management Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, China.

Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 27;14(12):1464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121464.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14121464
PMID:29186934
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750883/
Abstract

Carbon tax regulation and consumers' low-carbon preference act as incentives for firms to abate emissions. Manufacturers can improve product sustainability and retailers can strengthen the promotion of low-carbon products as part of such abatement. Current incomplete rationality also affects product sustainability and low-carbon promotion level. In this context, we consider a supply chain with a manufacturer and a retailer and investigate the impacts of the manufacturer's and the retailer's fairness concerns on their production sustainability level, low-carbon promotion level and profitability. We also explore the coordination contract. The results show that the manufacturer's and the retailer's fairness concerns decrease their product sustainability and low-carbon promotion level, together with the profits of the system and the manufacturer. With regard to the retailer's fairness concern, the product sustainability level and the manufacturer's profit are lower; moreover, the low-carbon promotion level and the profits of the supply chain and the retailer are higher. A revenue-sharing contract can coordinate the supply chain perfectly; however, members' fairness concerns increase the difficulty of coordination. Finally, the numerical results reveal that carbon tax regulation can encourage the manufacturer to enhance the product sustainability level. Further, the impacts on the low-carbon promotion level and firms' profitability are related to the cost coefficients of product sustainability.

摘要

碳税监管和消费者的低碳偏好激励企业减排。制造商可以提高产品可持续性,零售商可以加强低碳产品的推广,作为减排的一部分。当前不完全理性也会影响产品可持续性和低碳推广水平。在此背景下,我们考虑了一个由制造商和零售商组成的供应链,并研究了制造商和零售商的公平关切对其生产可持续性水平、低碳推广水平和盈利能力的影响。我们还探讨了协调合同。结果表明,制造商和零售商的公平关切降低了他们的产品可持续性和低碳推广水平,同时降低了系统和制造商的利润。就零售商的公平关切而言,产品可持续性水平和制造商的利润较低;此外,低碳推广水平以及供应链和零售商的利润较高。收益共享合同可以完美协调供应链;然而,成员的公平关切增加了协调的难度。最后,数值结果表明,碳税监管可以鼓励制造商提高产品可持续性水平。此外,对低碳推广水平和企业盈利能力的影响与产品可持续性的成本系数有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/89fc0a53697e/ijerph-14-01464-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/d26e1476d89f/ijerph-14-01464-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/68d1f23100a2/ijerph-14-01464-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/3dba9cc850c8/ijerph-14-01464-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/89fc0a53697e/ijerph-14-01464-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/d26e1476d89f/ijerph-14-01464-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/68d1f23100a2/ijerph-14-01464-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/3dba9cc850c8/ijerph-14-01464-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2c2/5750883/89fc0a53697e/ijerph-14-01464-g004a.jpg

相似文献

1
Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns.考虑碳税监管和公平关切的可持续供应链的联合决策与协调。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 27;14(12):1464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121464.
2
Research the effect of anticipated regret and fairness concerns on retailer-led supply chain.研究预期后悔和公平关切对零售商主导供应链的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0279334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279334. eCollection 2023.
3
Supply chain joint emission reduction differential decisions and coordination considering altruistic behavior and reference low-carbon effect.考虑利他行为和参考低碳效应的供应链联合减排差异决策与协调。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(15):22325-22349. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16901-z. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
4
Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下公平关切的低碳供应链最优定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020556.
5
Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference.考虑消费者环境意识和渠道偏好的公平关切和利他偏好的绿色双渠道供应链定价策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13564. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013564.
6
Dynamic analysis of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon tax regulation.考虑碳税政策的公平关切的双渠道闭环供应链动态分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57543-57565. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19715-9. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns.考虑水平和垂直公平关切的两个竞争制造商的绿色供应链定价决策分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66235-66258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19892-7. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Low-carbon strategies in dual-channel supply chain under risk aversion.规避风险下的双渠道供应链低碳策略。
Math Biosci Eng. 2022 Mar 14;19(5):4765-4793. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022223.
9
Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract.不同权力结构下的绿色供应链决策:批发价与收益共享合同。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;17(21):7737. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217737.
10
The Stability and Complexity Analysis of a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern Behavior and Sales Service.考虑公平关切行为和销售服务的低碳供应链的稳定性和复杂性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 30;16(15):2711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152711.

引用本文的文献

1
Coordination Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Risk Aversion under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下风险规避的低碳供应链协调决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 24;19(5):2656. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052656.
2
Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下公平关切的低碳供应链最优定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020556.
3
The Stability and Complexity Analysis of a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern Behavior and Sales Service.
考虑公平关切行为和销售服务的低碳供应链的稳定性和复杂性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 30;16(15):2711. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16152711.
4
Introducing of Online Channel and Management Strategy for Green Agri-food Supply Chain based on Pick-your-own Operations.基于采摘业务的绿色农产品供应链在线渠道构建与管理策略研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;16(11):1990. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111990.
5
A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors.考虑退货率和公平关切行为的低碳闭环供应链动态价格博弈模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;16(11):1978. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111978.
6
Decisions of the Dual-Channel Supply Chain under Double Policy Considering Remanufacturing.考虑再制造的双通道供应链双政策决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 5;16(3):465. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030465.
7
Leasing or Selling? Durable Goods Manufacturer Marketing Model Selection under a Mixed Carbon Trading-and-Tax Policy Scenario.租赁还是销售?混合碳交易与税收政策情景下耐用商品制造商营销模式选择
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 16;16(2):251. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020251.
8
Greenness and Pricing Decisions of Cooperative Supply Chains Considering Altruistic Preferences.考虑利他偏好的合作供应链的绿色度和定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 26;16(1):51. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010051.
9
Special Issue "Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development".特刊“绿色增长与可持续发展中的决策模型”
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 28;15(6):1093. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061093.
10
Decision-Making and Environmental Implications under Cap-and-Trade and Take-Back Regulations.总量管制与交易及回收法规下的决策与环境影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 4;15(4):678. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040678.