• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考虑水平和垂直公平关切的两个竞争制造商的绿色供应链定价决策分析。

Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns.

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, 30 Xueyuan Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100083, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66235-66258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19892-7. Epub 2022 May 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-19892-7
PMID:35499720
Abstract

A pricing-decision analysis is a critical aspect of supply chain management since it directly affects manufacturers' and retailers' profits. The members of a supply chain all want to be treated properly during the pricing process, which means that they pay attention to the fairness of the profit distribution. Additionally, consumers are increasingly gravitating to green products as their awareness of green consumption grows. Thus, incorporating consumers' green preferences into a supply chain, this paper investigates pricing decisions with two competitive manufacturers under horizontal and vertical fairness concerns and seeks the optimal degrees of product greenness, prices, profits, and utilities. The game-theoretical models with and without bidirectional fairness concerns are constructed and analyzed to identify the implications on pricing, profits, and utilities of competing manufacturers' bidirectional fairness concerns and consumers' green preferences. Then, we determine the decisional differences between the two designs using comparative analysis and numerical simulation. Finally, propositions, corollaries, and policy implications are derived. The results indicate that consumers' green preferences and competition between manufacturers contribute to increasing the optimal pricing and retailer's profit while harming manufacturers' utilities and the supply chain's profits under some conditions. The findings also demonstrate that horizontal and vertical fairness concerns generate different impacts on the product's greenness degree and pricing. Still, they are detrimental to manufacturers' utilities and supply chain profit while possessing negligible effects on retailer's profit.

摘要

定价决策分析是供应链管理的一个关键方面,因为它直接影响制造商和零售商的利润。供应链的成员都希望在定价过程中得到公平对待,这意味着他们关注利润分配的公平性。此外,随着消费者绿色消费意识的增强,他们越来越倾向于购买绿色产品。因此,将消费者的绿色偏好纳入供应链,本文研究了在水平和垂直公平关切下,两个竞争制造商的定价决策,并寻求产品绿色度、价格、利润和效用的最优程度。构建并分析了带有和不带有双向公平关切的博弈论模型,以确定竞争制造商的双向公平关切和消费者的绿色偏好对定价、利润和效用的影响。然后,我们使用比较分析和数值模拟来确定这两种设计之间的决策差异。最后,得出了一些命题、推论和政策含义。研究结果表明,在某些条件下,消费者的绿色偏好和制造商之间的竞争有助于提高最优定价和零售商的利润,同时损害制造商的效用和供应链的利润。研究结果还表明,水平和垂直公平关切对产品的绿色度和定价有不同的影响。然而,它们对制造商的效用和供应链利润不利,而对零售商的利润影响可以忽略不计。

相似文献

1
Pricing-decision analysis of green supply chain with two competitive manufacturers considering horizontal and vertical fairness concerns.考虑水平和垂直公平关切的两个竞争制造商的绿色供应链定价决策分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66235-66258. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19892-7. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Pricing Policies of Green Dual-Channel Supply Chain with Fairness Concerns and Altruistic Preferences Based on Consumers' Environmental Awareness and Channel Preference.考虑消费者环境意识和渠道偏好的公平关切和利他偏好的绿色双渠道供应链定价策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13564. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013564.
3
Research the effect of anticipated regret and fairness concerns on retailer-led supply chain.研究预期后悔和公平关切对零售商主导供应链的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 18;18(1):e0279334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279334. eCollection 2023.
4
Optimization of competitive supply chains with retailers' horizontal cooperation and consumers' green preference.零售商横向合作和消费者绿色偏好下的竞争性供应链优化。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(48):68426-68447. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14192-y. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
5
Greenness and Pricing Decisions of Cooperative Supply Chains Considering Altruistic Preferences.考虑利他偏好的合作供应链的绿色度和定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 26;16(1):51. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16010051.
6
Optimal decisions and Pareto improvement for green supply chain considering reciprocity and cost-sharing contract.考虑互惠和成本分担契约的绿色供应链的最优决策和帕累托改进。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29859-29874. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12752-w. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
A behaviour-based pricing model of the green product supply chain.基于行为的绿色产品供应链定价模型。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Dec;28(46):65923-65934. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15659-8. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
8
Optimal Pricing Decisions for a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Fairness Concern under Carbon Quota Policy.考虑碳配额政策下公平关切的低碳供应链最优定价决策。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;18(2):556. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020556.
9
Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns.考虑碳税监管和公平关切的可持续供应链的联合决策与协调。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Nov 27;14(12):1464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121464.
10
Pricing Strategies in Dual-Channel Reverse Supply Chains Considering Fairness Concern.考虑公平关切的双渠道逆向供应链定价策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 13;16(9):1657. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091657.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative study on government subsidy models for competitive drug supply chains under centralized procurement policy.集中采购政策下竞争性药品供应链政府补贴模式的比较研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 14;13:1542858. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1542858. eCollection 2025.