College of Business Administration, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.
Department of Geography and Planning, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 2E8, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 17;19(6):3590. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063590.
To facilitate the green transformation of enterprises and realize low-carbon development, governments have adopted the policies of carbon emission constraint and carbon trade to promote enterprises' low-carbon production. Although the two policies aim to reduce carbon emissions, they have different effects on enterprises' production. Meanwhile, the development of remanufacturing caters to the low-carbon economy. Therefore, this article establishes the game models between an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) and a remanufacturer under carbon-emission-constraint and carbon-trade policies, analyzing the production decisions of enterprises under different policies to compare the influence of the two policies on outsourcing remanufacturing. The main conclusions of the article are as follows: (1) Both carbon-emission-constraint and carbon-trade policies increase the unit retail price of remanufactured and new products, reducing the new products sales volume. However, the sales volume of remanufactured products only decreases if the discount rate is less than the rate of carbon emissions of the two products. (2) The upper limit of carbon emissions can affect the unit outsourcing cost. The unit cost of outsourcing under the carbon-emission-constraint policy is only higher when the upper limit of carbon emissions is less than a certain threshold, and the discount rate is larger than the proportion of carbon emissions for both products; otherwise, the unit outsourcing cost under the carbon-trade policy is higher. (3) Both policies lessen the total environmental implication. When the upper limit of carbon emissions is less than a particular threshold, the environmental effect of the two manufacturers under the carbon-emission-constraint policy is smaller; otherwise, the environmental impact is smaller under the carbon-trade policy.
为了促进企业的绿色转型,实现低碳发展,政府采取了碳排放约束和碳交易政策,以推动企业低碳生产。虽然这两项政策都旨在减少碳排放,但它们对企业生产的影响却不同。同时,再制造的发展也迎合了低碳经济的需求。因此,本文在碳排放约束和碳交易政策下,建立了原始设备制造商(OEM)和再制造商之间的博弈模型,分析了企业在不同政策下的生产决策,以比较这两项政策对外包再制造的影响。本文的主要结论如下:(1)碳排放约束和碳交易政策都提高了再制造和新产品的单位零售价格,减少了新产品的销售量。然而,只有当折扣率低于两种产品的碳排放量时,再制造产品的销售量才会下降。(2)碳排放量上限可以影响单位外包成本。只有当碳排放量上限低于一定阈值,且折扣率大于两种产品的碳排放量比例时,碳排放约束政策下的单位外包成本才会更高;否则,碳交易政策下的单位外包成本更高。(3)这两项政策都减轻了总体环境影响。当碳排放量上限低于特定阈值时,碳排放约束政策下的两个制造商的环境影响更小;否则,碳交易政策下的环境影响更小。