• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情时代的研究:研究伦理委员会面临的挑战

Research in the Time of COVID-19: Challenges of Research Ethics Committees.

作者信息

Reyes Marita

机构信息

National Ethics Committee.

出版信息

J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2020;35(1):29-32. doi: 10.15605/jafes.035.01.07. Epub 2020 May 23.

DOI:10.15605/jafes.035.01.07
PMID:33442166
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7784177/
Abstract

Compliance with ethics guidelines for research are even more critical in the time of emergency public health situations such as a pandemic. Underpinned by the principles laid out in the 1979 Belmont report, conduct of research at any time should focus on respect for persons, beneficence and justice. Certain Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in research ethics committees may be revised to provide a quicker turn-around and timely review. Key elements in effective review of studies include rigorousness, responsiveness and timeliness. It is crucial to recognize that ethics review committees share responsibility with researchers and its institutions, funding agencies and regulatory agencies for upholding ethical principles in research at all times.

摘要

在大流行等突发公共卫生情况下,遵守研究伦理准则更为关键。以1979年《贝尔蒙报告》中阐述的原则为基础,任何时候的研究行为都应注重对人的尊重、 beneficence和公正。研究伦理委员会的某些标准操作程序(SOP)可能会被修订,以实现更快的周转和及时的审查。有效审查研究的关键要素包括严谨性、响应性和及时性。必须认识到,伦理审查委员会与研究人员及其机构、资助机构和监管机构共同承担责任,始终在研究中坚持伦理原则。 注:“beneficence”常见释义为“善行”“慈善”等,在医学伦理语境中可灵活理解为符合伦理道德的有益性等意思 。

相似文献

1
Research in the Time of COVID-19: Challenges of Research Ethics Committees.新冠疫情时代的研究:研究伦理委员会面临的挑战
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2020;35(1):29-32. doi: 10.15605/jafes.035.01.07. Epub 2020 May 23.
2
Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel.伦理准备:在疫情期间促进伦理审查——专家小组的建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 6;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x.
3
Governance frameworks for COVID-19 research ethics review and oversight in Latin America: an exploratory study.拉丁美洲 COVID-19 研究伦理审查和监督的治理框架:一项探索性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Nov 6;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00715-2.
4
Principles of research ethics: A research primer for low- and middle-income countries.研究伦理原则:低收入和中等收入国家研究入门指南
Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;10(Suppl 2):S125-S129. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.07.006. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Small is beautiful: demystifying and simplifying standard operating procedures: a model from the ethics review and consultancy committee of the Cameroon Bioethics Initiative.小即是美:揭开标准操作程序的神秘面纱并简化之:喀麦隆生物伦理倡议组织伦理审查与咨询委员会的一个范例
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 May 13;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0110-8.
6
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
7
Complicating Narratives: Defining and Deconstructing Ethical Challenges in Community Psychology.复杂的叙事:定义和解构社区心理学中的伦理挑战。
Am J Community Psychol. 2017 Dec;60(3-4):491-501. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12177. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Principlism and the ethical appraisal of clinical trials.原则主义与临床试验的伦理评估
Bioethics. 1995 Oct;9(5):399-418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00314.x.
9
The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.灾害研究及时、有效且严格的伦理审查面临的挑战:研究伦理委员会成员的观点
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0157142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157142. eCollection 2016.
10
Research ethics application: a guide for the novice researcher.研究伦理申请:新手研究者指南
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(1):38-40, 42-3. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.1.38.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare Professionals' Knowledge, Views, and Perceptions of the Roles and Functions of Research Ethics Committees: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.医疗保健专业人员对研究伦理委员会的角色和职能的知识、观点及认知:一项基于网络的横断面调查
J Korean Med Sci. 2025 Feb 3;40(4):e9. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2025.40.e9.
2
Impact of the COVID pandemic on functioning of the institutional ethics committee: A comparison study.新冠疫情对机构伦理委员会运作的影响:一项比较研究。
Perspect Clin Res. 2024 Jan-Mar;15(1):31-37. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_79_23. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
3
Rapid Rescoping and Adaptation: An Evaluation of the Impact of COVID-19 on Postgraduate Medical Student Research Projects.快速调整与适应:对新冠疫情对研究生医学科研项目影响的评估
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Mar 30;33(2):523-530. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01777-0. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Data Collection in Times of Pandemic: A Self-Study and Revisit of Research Practices During a Crisis.疫情期间的数据收集:危机时期的自我研究与对研究实践的反思
Sage Open. 2023 Mar 27;13(1):21582440231160698. doi: 10.1177/21582440231160698. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
5
Approaches to enabling rapid evaluation of innovations in health and social care: a scoping review of evidence from high-income countries.促进卫生和社会保健创新快速评估的方法:高收入国家证据的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e064345. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064345.
6
How COVID-19 changed clinical research strategies: a global survey.新冠疫情如何改变临床研究策略:一项全球调查。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Apr;50(4):3000605221093179. doi: 10.1177/03000605221093179.
7
Health science research barriers and facilitators in the midst of the COVID-19 crisis: scoping review.COVID-19 危机期间健康科学研究的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2021 Dec 30;72(4):377-395. doi: 10.18597/rcog.3788.
8
AFES A.S.-O.N.E.: ASEAN Survey Of Needs in Endocrinology in the Time of the COVID-19 Pandemic.AFES A.S.-O.N.E.:新冠疫情期间东盟内分泌学需求调查
J ASEAN Fed Endocr Soc. 2020;35(1):5-13. doi: 10.15605/jafes.035.01.10. Epub 2020 May 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethics Committee Reviews of Applications for Research Studies at 1 Hospital in China During the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Epidemic.伦理委员会对中国 1 家医院在 2019 年新型冠状病毒疫情期间研究申请的审查。
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1844-1846. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4362.
2
Ethics preparedness: facilitating ethics review during outbreaks - recommendations from an expert panel.伦理准备:在疫情期间促进伦理审查——专家小组的建议。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 May 6;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0366-x.
3
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
4
What makes clinical research ethical?临床研究的伦理准则是什么?
JAMA. 2000;283(20):2701-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.20.2701.