Villalobos-Pérez Alejandra, Reyes-Guanes Juliana, Muñoz-Ortiz Juliana, Estévez-Florez María Andrea, Ramos-Santodomingo Mario, Balaguera-Orjuela Valentina, de-la-Torre Alejandra
Universidad del Norte, Barranquilla, Colombia.
Escuela Barraquer. Research Group, Escuela Superior de Oftalmología del Instituto Barraquer de América, Bogotá, Colombia.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 6;15:1-10. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S287766. eCollection 2021.
To describe the evaluation and referral process from a group of patients with uveitis presented at a specialized uveitis center in Bogotá, Colombia.
An observational descriptive cross-sectional study was performed. After applying the selection criteria, 315 clinical records were recovered. Univariate and bivariate analyses were used, reporting proportions, means and standard deviations.
The mean age of the sample was 45.23 years old and 63.8% of them were females. Patients were mostly referred by retina specialists, general ophthalmologists, rheumatologists, and cornea specialists. Meantime between the first ocular symptom and uveitis specialist evaluation was 2.08 years. Patients had been previously evaluated by a mean of 1.9 ophthalmologists. In 79.9% of patients, inflammation was recognized by the remittent; however, only 4.7% of patients were correctly graded according to SUN classification. At first time consultation with the uvea specialist, 52.1% of the patients arrived with an adequate infectious panel, 58.1% with an adequate rheumatologic panel, 11.6% with aqueous humor PCR study, 65.1% with an initial etiological diagnosis, 34.9% with inadequate topical treatment, and 59.6% with inadequate systemic treatment. The mean time to reach a diagnosis by the uvea specialist was 5.27 weeks (0.10 years). A diagnostic coincidence was not reached in 58.7% of the cases.
The referral process to uveitis specialists is complex but highly relevant for those who suffer from this pathology. Health professionals must be aware of the standardized classification of the disease, the appropriate treatment according to the classification, and early referral to the uveologist with adequate laboratory tests.
描述在哥伦比亚波哥大一家专业葡萄膜炎中心就诊的一组葡萄膜炎患者的评估和转诊过程。
进行了一项观察性描述性横断面研究。应用选择标准后,收集了315份临床记录。采用单变量和双变量分析,报告比例、均值和标准差。
样本的平均年龄为45.23岁,其中63.8%为女性。患者大多由视网膜专科医生、普通眼科医生、风湿病学家和角膜专科医生转诊。首次眼部症状出现至葡萄膜炎专科评估的平均时间为2.08年。患者此前平均由1.9名眼科医生进行过评估。79.9%的患者炎症呈间歇性发作;然而,根据SUN分类,只有4.7%的患者得到了正确分级。首次咨询葡萄膜炎专科医生时,52.1%的患者进行了充分的感染相关检查,58.1%的患者进行了充分的风湿病相关检查,11.6%的患者进行了房水聚合酶链反应研究,65.1%的患者有初步病因诊断,34.9%的患者局部治疗不充分,59.6%的患者全身治疗不充分。葡萄膜炎专科医生做出诊断的平均时间为5.27周(0.10年)。58.7%的病例未达成诊断共识。
转诊至葡萄膜炎专科医生的过程复杂,但对患有这种疾病的患者非常重要。卫生专业人员必须了解该疾病的标准化分类、根据分类进行的适当治疗,以及尽早将患者转诊至葡萄膜炎专科医生并进行充分的实验室检查。