McCannel C A, Holland G N, Helm C J, Cornell P J, Winston J V, Rimmer T G
UCLA Ocular Inflammatory Disease Center, Jules Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine 90095-7003, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;121(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)70532-x.
Most uveitis case series have come from tertiary care centers, and the relative frequencies of disorders they report may reflect referral bias. We sought information about the types of uveitis encountered in the general practice of ophthalmology.
We prospectively examined 213 consecutive cases of general uveitis, defined as intraocular inflammation other than cytomegalovirus retinopathy, seen by a group of community-based comprehensive ophthalmologists. This group of cases was compared with 213 consecutive cases of general uveitis examined by a uveitis specialist at a university referral center in the same community. All cases were categorized by anatomic site of inflammation and disease course, and, if possible, they were assigned a specific diagnosis. Cases of cytomegalovirus retinopathy and masquerade syndrome seen during the same intervals were recorded separately.
The distribution of general uveitis cases by anatomic site of disease was significantly different between the community-based practices (anterior, 90.6%; intermediate, 1.4%; posterior 4.7%; panuveitis, 1.4%) and the university referral practice (anterior, 60.6%; intermediate, 12.2%; posterior, 14.6%; panuveitis, 9.4%; P < .00005). A cause or clinical syndrome could be assigned to 47.4% of cases in the community-based practices, and to 57.8% of cases in the university referral practice (P = .03). HLA-B27-associated anterior uveitis, cytomegalovirus retinopathy, and toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis were among the five most common forms of uveitis in both practice settings.
The relative frequencies with which various forms of uveitis are seen in a tertiary referral center do not necessarily reflect the experience of ophthalmologists from the community in which the center is located. Anterior uveitis and disorders of sudden onset constitute a greater proportion of cases seen by community-based comprehensive ophthalmologists.
大多数葡萄膜炎病例系列来自三级医疗中心,它们所报告的疾病相对频率可能反映了转诊偏倚。我们旨在获取有关眼科普通临床实践中所遇到的葡萄膜炎类型的信息。
我们前瞻性地检查了由一组社区综合眼科医生诊治的213例连续的普通葡萄膜炎病例,这些病例被定义为除巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎之外的眼内炎症。将这组病例与同一社区大学转诊中心的一位葡萄膜炎专家所检查的213例连续的普通葡萄膜炎病例进行比较。所有病例均根据炎症的解剖部位和病程进行分类,并且如果可能的话,为其指定具体诊断。在相同时间段内见到的巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎和伪装综合征病例单独记录。
社区临床实践(前部,90.6%;中间部,1.4%;后部,4.7%;全葡萄膜炎,1.4%)和大学转诊临床实践(前部,60.6%;中间部,12.2%;后部,14.6%;全葡萄膜炎,9.4%;P <.00005)中,按疾病解剖部位划分的普通葡萄膜炎病例分布存在显著差异。在社区临床实践中,47.4%的病例可确定病因或临床综合征,在大学转诊临床实践中这一比例为57.8%(P = 0.03)。HLA - B27相关的前部葡萄膜炎、巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎和弓形虫性视网膜脉络膜炎在两种临床实践环境中均为最常见的五种葡萄膜炎形式。
在三级转诊中心所见到的各种形式葡萄膜炎的相对频率不一定反映该中心所在社区眼科医生的经验。前部葡萄膜炎和突发疾病在社区综合眼科医生所诊治的病例中占更大比例。